Re: Re: Re: Re: Next cycle(people worried about liver toxicity need not apply)
Well I don't see how tren would matter because it isn't 17a anyhow. As for halo I was just making the point that its 17a and if I remeber right it has a triple bond while anadorl only has a double. And even if halo was twice as bad as anadrol it still wouldn't add up to the stress on the liver that 200mgs of anadrol would cause. I wil only be taking 60mgs of anadrol and 30mgs of halo. So say halo was twice as bad: 60+30(2)=120mgs. So it would still be like taking only 120mgs of anadrol and besides to the best of my knowledge halo isn't twice as bad. Am I wrong here? If so go ahead and give me your opinion. Once again I'm not trying to be a know it all. You seem like a smart bro so I'm just curious of your opinion on it.
thx9000 said:
Oh, yeah, halo isn't anadrol so that information really isn't relevant anyhow. Oh, and I don't think any of the perscribing information takes into account that the anemic patient might have the urge to take anadrol with halo or tren or dbol.
Well I don't see how tren would matter because it isn't 17a anyhow. As for halo I was just making the point that its 17a and if I remeber right it has a triple bond while anadorl only has a double. And even if halo was twice as bad as anadrol it still wouldn't add up to the stress on the liver that 200mgs of anadrol would cause. I wil only be taking 60mgs of anadrol and 30mgs of halo. So say halo was twice as bad: 60+30(2)=120mgs. So it would still be like taking only 120mgs of anadrol and besides to the best of my knowledge halo isn't twice as bad. Am I wrong here? If so go ahead and give me your opinion. Once again I'm not trying to be a know it all. You seem like a smart bro so I'm just curious of your opinion on it.