My response to HanzNZ's constant USA bashing

[HulkRow]

bloody hell.....LOL
i dont give two shits about (the war) cause it has no effect on me. not to say its bad thing then again its a good thing isent it? i guess if you view it as such, but people are not always gonna feel the same way...different people ,different views, live with it.

 

[Drifter]

If it's such an important thing to get rid of Saddam then why is the US having so much trouble getting the UN to support them?

 

[ariolanine]

If it's such an important thing to get rid of Saddam then why is the US having so much trouble getting the UN to support them?

For two reasons only:

1. George Bush is Republican
2. George Bush is a Christian

 

[Frackal]

For two reasons only:

1. George Bush is Republican
2. George Bush is a Christian

hahahaha

 

[ariolanine]

hahahaha

Sad isn't it?

 

[Norman Bates]

If it's such an important thing to get rid of Saddam then why is the US having so much trouble getting the UN to support them?

Because most of the world, including me, doesn´t see Saddam Hussein as a threat.

The notion that the world isn´t doing what GW Bush proposes because of his religion or party affiliation is ridicolous.

 

[ariolanine]

Because most of the world, including me, doesn´t see Saddam Hussein as a threat.

The notion that the world isn´t doing what GW Bush proposes because of his religion or party affiliation is ridicolous.

You know that if this was Gore, nobody would be opposed. Not one single person or country protested when Clinton bombed Serbia, Afganistan, Sudan, and Iraq. Not one. You are giving to much credit to the UN and the protesters. Besides, there are now 45 countries that support the war. All of the world's most important nations (based on economics and trade) support the war on Iraq. You cannot honestly believe that the french opposition has nothing to do with who Dubya is as a person.

 

[muscle_geek]

If it's such an important thing to get rid of Saddam then why is the US having so much trouble getting the UN to support them?

The ONLY reason that countries are opposing Bush is that they have financial ties to Iraq. That is the ONLY reason. We wouldn't have needed to wage actual war against Iraq if the UN would have full supported the resolution. The vetoing nations gave Sadaam hope that he could play diplomatic games and get away once again.

 

[ariolanine]

The ONLY reason that countries are opposing Bush is that they have financial ties to Iraq. That is the ONLY reason. We wouldn't have needed to wage actual war against Iraq if the UN would have full supported the resolution. The vetoing nations gave Sadaam hope that he could play diplomatic games and get away once again.

If a democrat was in office, he would gladly grab his ankles and let the french, russians, and chinese have iraq after we finish offing sodom. They know Dubya is taking control of that oil and installing the government so they are pissed.

 

[Norman Bates]

You know that if this was Gore, nobody would be opposed. Not one single person or country protested when Clinton bombed Serbia, Afganistan, Sudan, and Iraq. Not one. You are giving to much credit to the UN and the protesters

There is a difference between what Clinton did and between what Bush is doing now.

The reason why the world is opposing the invasion is because it is a crime in international law and because the US administration failed to present any evidence.

They know Dubya is taking control of that oil and installing the government so they are pissed.

Imperialism is not very popular either. But you are at least honest enough to state one of the real reasons for this invasion.