Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

My most wanted car

hanselthecaretaker

High End Bro
Platinum
Dodge-Challenger-Concept-12.jpg


Dodge%20Challenger%20Concept%202-lg.jpg


http://www.dodge.com/en/challenger/index.html


The upcoming Camaro is pretty cool too, but is technically still a concept-

chevrolet-camaro-concept-2006-712141.jpg

large%20di%20chevrolet%20camaro%20concept%202006%20-%2003.jpg


http://www.chevrolet.com/performance/


What's yours?
 
Smurfy said:
what's up mah brutha?


Sup baby blue. What's your car?
 
out of any car you would pic these???????????????? what about a buggati veyron, Ferarri F430, Lambo Murcielago, Mercedes AMG 65, Saleen S7
 
Wootoom said:
out of any car you would pic these???????????????? what about a buggati veyron, Ferarri F430, Lambo Murcielago, Mercedes AMG 65, Saleen S7


Excess. I like remade classics.
 
Looks good but probably less reliable than Chinese pet food
 
is that a two door charger or a challenger?
fuggin badass, the RT is pimping
 
The new Challenger will weigh over 4100 pounds. What a porker.

But then the old Challenger was a pig too.
 
Gambino said:
is that a two door charger or a challenger?
fuggin badass, the RT is pimping

Challenger pretty much IS a two-door Charger. Built on the same Mercedes E-Class platform used by the Chrysler 300, Dodge Magnum, and Dodge Charger.
 
Mr. dB said:
Challenger pretty much IS a two-door Charger. Built on the same Mercedes E-Class platform used by the Chrysler 300, Dodge Magnum, and Dodge Charger.

even back in the day that was the case?
i thought they were gonna release a 2 door charger, i even saw spy pics of it.
don't see the point in releasing the same car 2, so why would they make a challenger?
either way that's a sharp looking car
 
the dodge is just plain awesome. . .the chevy missed the mark. . .i'm a chevy guy and i think that car is butt-ugly. . .
 
Gambino said:
even back in the day that was the case?

No, Chrysler did not share chassis with Mercedes Benz in the early 1970s... :rolleyes:

The 1970 Challenger was built on what was called the "E-Body" platform, shared with the Plymouth Barracuda, which was little more than a shorter-wheelbase version of the "B-Body" platform used by the Plymouth Satellite, Dodge Coronet, Plymouth Road Runner, Dodge Charger, Chrysler Cordoba...
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
What's yours?


I want another Lexus, but I haven't seen much in their lineup the last few years that interests me. Mercedes pisses me off, they try to make it so you can't do jack shit to your own car, you gotta take it to the dealer for everything. Never owned an Acura, probably never will, and BMWs are for wimmins.
 
Wootoom said:
i think they wrecked the looks personally, that dodge looks horrible


They'll probably tweak the back end yet at least....sounds like the Challenger is still a concept too.
 
digimon7068 said:
super bee w/426 hemi. . . .sweeeeeeeet. . .

I didn't know that Plymouth Super Bees had a "Charger" emblem on the C-pillar...
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
The upcoming Camaro is pretty cool too, but is technically still a concept-

chevrolet-camaro-concept-2006-712141.jpg

large%20di%20chevrolet%20camaro%20concept%202006%20-%2003.jpg


http://www.chevrolet.com/performance/


What's yours?

GM needs to stfu already about their """Camaro Concept Car No Sure If We're Really Going To Produce It Though!"""

There's no way they're not going to produce it, and everyone knows it. They're trying to build as much hype as possible with this bullshit.
 
RottenWillow said:
GM needs to stfu already about their """Camaro Concept Car No Sure If We're Really Going To Produce It Though!"""

There's no way they're not going to produce it, and everyone knows it. They're trying to build as much hype as possible with this bullshit.


I also don't see the point in releasing a new design so soon after they haulted production of the old one. It looks cool so far, but that's about it.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
I also don't see the point in releasing a new design so soon after they haulted production of the old one. It looks cool so far, but that's about it.

because Ford brought back the "retro" look on their Mustang and Chrysler did the same with the 300 and Charger so GM had no choice.
 
digimon7068 said:
:confused: dodge. . .the plymouth sister car was the road runner. . .

Oops.

Well, the green car is still a Charger, not a Super Bee. Super Bee was built on a standard Coronet coupe body.

MOPAR still sucks.
 
Mr. dB said:
Oops.

Well, the green car is still a Charger, not a Super Bee. Super Bee was built on a standard Coronet coupe body.

MOPAR still sucks.

you're absolutely right. . .it's just a charger. . .
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
I also don't see the point in releasing a new design so soon after they haulted production of the old one. It looks cool so far, but that's about it.

like someone else said, they're just jumping on the retromuscle bandwagon, hence the quick turnaround. My beef is just that fairy at GM with his gameplaying. You're building this car, everyone knows it, now put a sock in it.

And if he doesnt build it, then he's a complete moron. They've got probably 100k units already in the bag the first model year.
 
Mr. dB said:
Oops.

Well, the green car is still a Charger, not a Super Bee. Super Bee was built on a standard Coronet coupe body.

MOPAR still sucks.

Plymouth AAR 'Cuda
 
Mr. dB said:
Oops.

Well, the green car is still a Charger, not a Super Bee. Super Bee was built on a standard Coronet coupe body.

MOPAR still sucks.
Also had the wing on the back.
 
Top Bottom