Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Most Efficient Exercises (EMG Testing)

future

Freelance Writer
Platinum
Well, thanks to EMG (Electromyography), we can now determine the best exercises for each muscle group. An EMG is a device that is used for measuring extremely small amounts of electricity generated by muscles below the surface of the skin. Let me explain how EMG works so you can get a better idea.

Two collectors called electrodes are placed on the surface of the skin above the muscle being tested. A computer determines the underlying electrical difference. These differences may indicate excessive muscle tension. For our purposes, the differences will also determine the percent of muscle fibers being stressed.

The following are the best exercises for each body part in order of most effective to least. Beside the number is the percentage of muscle fibers worked.

Chest

* Decline dumbbell bench press - 93%
* Incline dumbbell press - 91%
* Decline bench press - 89%
* Flat dumbbell bench press - 87%
* Flat barbell bench press - 85%

The flat barbell bench press, an exercise that is done by many beginners, is one of the least effective exercises. With chest, we can see that dumbbells are far superior to barbells.

Biceps

* One-arm preacher curl, *N/A
* Incline dumbbells, N/A
* Barbell curl w/ narrow grip, N/A

The best bicep exercises are the ones that isolate them. It is very hard to cheat on one-arm preacher curls and the incline dumbbell curls keep your biceps in a stretched position at the bottom.

Triceps

* Skull crushers on a decline bench, N/A
* Pushdowns w/ a rope, N/A

Skull crushers are an effective exercise, but doing them on a decline bench keeps them in constant tension through out the whole movement. With a rope, you can add an extra pushing out movement at the bottom of a pushdown.

Lats

* Bent over barbell rows - 93%
* One arm dumbbell rows - 91%
* T-bar rows - 89%
* Lat pulldown - 86%
* Seated pulley rows - 83%

I was surprised myself that pull-ups weren't one of the best exercises. The bent over row is the most effective exercise for the lats, and should be included in every back workout. It doesn't matter where they are, just include them.

Side Delts

* Incline dumbbell side laterals - 66%
* Standing dumbbell side laterals - 63%
* Seated dumbbell side laterals - 62%
* Cable side laterals - 47%

Many prefer to do their laterals seated because they can execute a more strict movement, but doing them in this fashion reduces the percent of muscle fibers being worked. Dumbbells prove to be more effective than cables.

Rear Delts

* Standing dumbbell bent laterals - 85%
* Seated dumbbell laterals - 83%
* Standing cable bent laterals - 77%

Same as with side delts.

Calves

* Donkey calf raise - 80%
* Standing one-leg calf raises - 79%
* Standing two-leg calf raises - 68%
* Seated calf raises - 61%

Donkey calf raises are a forgotten exercise that I rarely see people doing. If you have weak calves, you should definitely be doing these. The one-legged versions are more effective for calves than the two-legged versions.

Hamstrings

* Standing leg curls - 82%
* Lying leg curls - 71%
* Seated leg curls - 58%
* Sitff-legged-deadlift - 56%

Just like with calves, the one-legged hamstring exercises are more effective.

Quads

* Leg extension, N/A
* Squats, N/A
* Lunges, N/A

The leg extension is the most effective exercise here. The reason is because it's an isolation movement, and the quads are doing all of the work. Squats should be included in every workout. Even though they are one of the best compound movements, they still work the quads to a great deal. In recent studies, foot placement was shown to have little effect.

Abs

* Bicycle crunch maneuver, N/A
* Hanging leg raise, N/A
* Crunches on an exercise ball, N/A

In the bicycle maneuver, all the parts of the abdominals are being worked, upper, lower, and the obliques. The crunch on an exercise ball requires more stabilizer muscles.

We can conclude some ideas from these readings. An exercise can never work 100% of muscles fibers, which is why it is important to perform a variety of exercises and to change your workout every couple of weeks. Every exercise wasn't tested in this study, so it would be advisable to include some of these exercises in your routine and also experiment with others to see which gives you the best feeling. The exercises listed here are not necessarily the best mass-builders but they were proven to be the most effective.

* No studies were done that showed the percentage of muscle fibers being worked. However, studies were done to determine the most effective.

1. The science behind the physique: EMG Relived. http://www.tudorbumpa.com/org.htm
2. Fahey, Thomas EdD. 25 best lifts. December, 2001. http://www.musculardevelopment.com/new/25bestlifts.htm
 
They leave out a few big factors though. WHY doesn't the leg extension and curl build bigger legs than the squat and leg press do?

Similar to the incline/decline compared to the flat bench. There are LOTS of muscles involved (read: have the chance to grow) from doing a proper bench press.
 
Actually the results are listed as "not available." I don't think it's something for your sport anyway or a powerlifter. It does give some guidelines to people that need direction.
 
Actually the results are listed as "not available." I don't think it's something for your sport anyway or a powerlifter. It does give some guidelines to people that need direction.

You didn't get my point.

The results I asked for were non available...BUT STILL the most complex exercise would still give the most all around benefit. I'm sure one of those stim machine readers would should that you got superior quad stimulation through a leg extension over a squat...but we all know that the leg extension is not going to build the same kind of legs that the squat will.

Has nothing to do with my sport or a powerlifter.
 
The quadriceps to contract more doing extensions versus squats. Are squats better overall sure. But they build the glutes, hams, abductors, adductors and quads not to mention the soleus. Still for just QUADS I would think leg extensions would create a better contraction thus recruiting more fibers.

And I am an ex powerlifter so no worries.
 
The quadriceps to contract more doing extensions versus squats. Are squats better overall sure. But they build the glutes, hams, abductors, adductors and quads not to mention the soleus. Still for just QUADS I would think leg extensions would create a better contraction thus recruiting more fibers.

And I am an ex powerlifter so no worries.

That was exactly my point.

The leg ext would recruit more quad but would it give a bigger leg?
 
I gotcha. In that regard compound exercises are always more efficient but you and I know that. Still for directly working the quads leg extensions would be the way to go.
 
Just as the isolation biecept curl would recruit more bie, but heavy deads (and squats) will give you bigger arms.

Explaining that to the guys at the local gyms is like explaining rocket science in Greek to me...
 
Will I get 20 inches arms doing heavy squats and deads, and what's heavy 2x BW? 3x BW? Can I still get them with moderate squat and deads numbers?

How come wheel-chair bodybuilders manage to have big guns, being their legs disabled how come they can achieve such results without doing squats and deads, it's something that has always made me wonder...
 
steroids lol. Although I wonder how doing deadlifts increases bicep size... I understand the deadlift is a pull, but there is no pulling involving the biceps like a row or a pullup which both involve the elbow joint. Can anyone enlighten me?
 
steroids lol. Although I wonder how doing deadlifts increases bicep size... I understand the deadlift is a pull, but there is no pulling involving the biceps like a row or a pullup which both involve the elbow joint. Can anyone enlighten me?

overall load on the body. Kinda like big calves on the guys who can squat 500lbs...
 
People ask me all the time what I do for biceps.

Last week I did 2 sets of curls with an empty bar. 1 Set of hammer curls with the 25's.

I also loaded atlas stones, tire flip, chin ups, log clean and press, near 700 lb good mornings, etc... My arms are just a hair under 20".
 
People ask me all the time what I do for biceps.

Last week I did 2 sets of curls with an empty bar. 1 Set of hammer curls with the 25's.

I also loaded atlas stones, tire flip, chin ups, log clean and press, near 700 lb good mornings, etc... My arms are just a hair under 20".

700lb. good mornings?!?!?!?
...and i thought i was crazy doing 225...
 
Thanks artificial, that clarified things.

Hey B fold, just curious.. how much do you think they'd grow if you put dedication into direct arm work? I've heard of olympic lifters training for higher reps and blowing up with muscle, but I couldn't imagine your arms to blow up much since they might be close to their genetic limit..? Hah, you're only about 4 inches away from Ronnie Coleman.
 
People ask me all the time what I do for biceps.

Last week I did 2 sets of curls with an empty bar. 1 Set of hammer curls with the 25's.

I also loaded atlas stones, tire flip, chin ups, log clean and press, near 700 lb good mornings, etc... My arms are just a hair under 20".

hehehee it is the one thing people do not understand. I sometimes try to explain it to people this way: Your arms alone are pretty weak, most people can't strict curly over a 50lb DB, yet they can do compound movements with hundreds of pounds. You think your biceps just don't do anything when you squat or deadlift? You are putting much more stress on them that way then doing curls over and over again.

^^^ To some that gets the message across, to others.... well they end up doing chest and "arms" routine the rest of their life. lol
 
I think the biggest flaw with this is that it shows what percentage of muscle fibers are working but not how hard they are working. I'm sure a 500lb squat would make them work harder then a leg extension. I could be way off though, just throwing ideas out there let me know what you think future and Bfold.
 
Thanks artificial, that clarified things.

Hey B fold, just curious.. how much do you think they'd grow if you put dedication into direct arm work? I've heard of olympic lifters training for higher reps and blowing up with muscle, but I couldn't imagine your arms to blow up much since they might be close to their genetic limit..? Hah, you're only about 4 inches away from Ronnie Coleman.

From September till about November or December I got fairly serious in doing about 6 sets or so for biceps a week and I can say that they got more pumped and harder. Doing heavy squats, gm's, stones, tire, yoke, etc...and hard curls can put you into so much joint pain (from wrist to shoulder/neck) that you can't do much of anything.

I'm not a fan of avoiding training biceps, just don't see it as necessary as some.

A guy I train with can way out curl me...heck, MOST can out curl me...and they will say that they can't pick up a certain atlas stone because of a bicep weakness yet I play with it. So????

And my near 20" arms still look skinny and long. My arms look nothing like Colemans...yet his looked better than mine do now before he ever touched a weight too...lol And I've been training near 16 years straight.
 
I don't believe this study.

Judging by doms, there is no way leg extensions cause more muscular damage on my quads than close stance high bar olympic squat or FS.
 
Further, in my observation for

(1) lats, pull up > all else;
(2) I agree with decline skull crusher being potentially number 1 and also prefer one legged calf exercises for some reason.
(3) i have read that the hamstring muscle is more dominated by hip extention as opposed to knee flexion muscles, so the list suprises me. They didn't get GHR which would probably be number
(4) they didn't include dips for pecs. I wouldn't be suprised if these were number 1 personally for chest.
(5) preacher curls have substantial involvement of the brachais as opposed to the biscep and not everyone responds well to this from my experience.
(6) the leg extension doesn't hit the quad high, nor does a shallow squat.

Shame they didn't include lower back and glutes in their analysis.
 
I don't believe this study.

Judging by doms, there is no way leg extensions cause more muscular damage on my quads than close stance high bar olympic squat or FS.

DOMS is an indication of lack of conditioning, not effectiveness of your work out or specific exercise.
 
The emg is testing muscle activation right? So of course isolation exercises are going to win the comp. Take leg ext vs. squats for example, the leg ext is gonna target the quads. The squat is going to work the hips, glutes, hams, calves, spinal erectors and calves (among others) to lift the weight so 100% quad activation isn't neccesary because the body is working as a system.

I know it may isolate better than squat but it doesn't mean it is more effective in overall conditioning.

Hit me w/ some K!
 
Top Bottom