Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Mega solar systems spotted!

Sassy69

New member
My personal interest in this stuff - to give you historical perspective - I was at the Planetary Physics / Terrestrial Sciences conference over Halloween of 1987 in Austin, TX where Carl Sagan discussed the first evidence of a solar system outside of our own, identified by an unaccounted for force in the gravitation in a binary star system. Not directly observed, but identified by inference.

Telescope spots two mega solar systems

Thursday, February 9, 2006; Posted: 10:22 a.m. EST (15:22 GMT)
PASADENA, California (AP) -- Astronomers said Wednesday they have spotted evidence of two mega solar systems -- giant stars enveloped by what appear to be huge disks of planet-forming dust.

Cloudy disks around stars are believed to represent current or future planetary systems. Our sun is surrounded by the Kuiper Belt, a disk containing dust, comets and other bodies.

Astronomers said the latest findings were surprising because such massive stars are thought to be inhospitable to the formation of planets.

"Our data suggest that the planet-forming process may be hardier than previously believed, occurring around even the most massive stars," Joel Kastner, of the Rochester Institute of Technology, said in a statement.

Results appear in the February 10 issue of the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

The new stars were measured to be 30 to 70 times more massive than the sun. Because of the stars' size, scientists said the surrounding debris disks are larger versions of the Kuiper Belt and probably contain about 10 times more mass.

The new stars were found using NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope during a survey of 60 bright stars. Kastner said the new discoveries stuck out from the rest because an analysis indicated the presence of flat disks.

Last year, another team of scientists discovered what they believe was a mini solar system. The team found a dust cloud around a brown dwarf, or failed star.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
 
i love reading about that stuff
Space is such a mystery
 
Maybe it's me. But am I interpreting this article differently from everyone else...I see it as though the scientists may have found something to further prove the theory of the big bang throught the formations of solar systems and planet formations etc etc.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
It's exciting stuff but, without pics, it's all circumstantial evidence. Until we get this dark matter issue cleared up, even Newton's laws of gravity are up for discussion.
 
I wish everyone would just quit copying us, we were the first.So there!!!!
its getting to be like na na na my solar system's bigger than yours!
RADAR
 
ceasar989 said:
Maybe it's me. But am I interpreting this article differently from everyone else...I see it as though the scientists may have found something to further prove the theory of the big bang throught the formations of solar systems and planet formations etc etc.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

There are lots of dimensions of the big bang theory - i.e. it consists of a concept of evolution of the universe - we can extrapolate back to something like milliseconds after the "bang", but we can only speculate as to what happened "at" the bang. We postulate about the process of planet formation but our own planet & solar system are the only "proven" examples of this. We never had the ability to "see" to the dimension of planetary systems, though the theoretical physics (e.g. gravitation and unobserved, but theorized answers to deviations from the expected calculations) and observations of energy / mass or inferred missing energy / mass provides more evidence to support the ideas. Twenty yrs ago there were measurements of gravitational force that couldn't be accounted for by observation, so we made some educated guesses based on the laws of physics. Now we have the ability to see at greater resolution, but maybe can't see in detail enough to be absolute in our assumptions of what we are seeing. But we are also observing more & different types of things than we could before and these may or may not fit into the hypotheses that we've arrived at based on previous observations.
 
Sassy is using drugs again. Awesome
 
Top Bottom