I already did a search, so don't flame me (except if I'm on the wrong board, but this is where i usually post).
A chiro at my gym has one of those hand-held electrical bio-impedance devices. He said it was pretty accurate, but was "age-prejudiced" ie, it assumes we all get fatter as we age. I'm a pretty lean 49; when he measured me w/ ht, wt, and age as stats, it read 14.5%. When he used same ht, wt, and entered age 20, it read 7.5%!
Any input on this disparity?
buff(?)doc
A chiro at my gym has one of those hand-held electrical bio-impedance devices. He said it was pretty accurate, but was "age-prejudiced" ie, it assumes we all get fatter as we age. I'm a pretty lean 49; when he measured me w/ ht, wt, and age as stats, it read 14.5%. When he used same ht, wt, and entered age 20, it read 7.5%!
Any input on this disparity?
buff(?)doc

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










