atlantabiolab
New member
MattTheSkywalker said:I would like to get married. Not in any rush though...if anything my standards may be too high...but my available time is so low that I can barely date much now...anyway...
Part of it is willingess to make a commitment to one person above all others, and to have some kind of official recognition of it.
People might object to that reasoning, saying that if that commitment is genuine, why do you need the state's sanctioing? Well, there are a few reasons - first the practical:
Many benefits, from government and other soruces, apply to married couples but not necessarily to two people living together. This includes health benefits, and there are some other advantages for business ownership and taxation, etc., that only pertain to married couples.
Overly practical perhaps, but at the same time, ignoring entirely the practical in life will not get you very far.
next - it;s easy to say "yeah we're serious, we'll always be together", but when you say it and the outcome entails the pain of divorce (financial, emotional pain etc.), well, then the actions of committing to the person speak louder than the words.
Last reason I can think of - if one plans to have kids, one of the most important lessons you can teach them is to be a person of honor and integrity. A commitment like marriage demonstrates this like almost nothing else.
Additionally, it also teaches the greatest of life's lessons: actions have consequences, and the actionsof the parents form the basis for how that child will interact with others throughout life.
Married parents are the best option to raising children who can excel in the world.
Well said.
Marriage is a natural extension of man's social nature. The idea of demonstrating the bond, and thus the removal of the individuals from courtship, between two people before society is the basis of marriage.
Why do people marry? Why did I marry? Tradition. There said it. Nothing wrong with tradition, if it stands the test of time, it must have something going for it, aside from the fact, that I have never heard anyone produce a valid argument for it's abolition. The social/critical theorists who attempt to discredit all traditional values have provided no valid arguments against it, simply historical facts, which do not discredit the ideas. Because men in 300 B.C. clubbed a woman and essentially made her property does not discredit the idea and virtue that we hold currently in marriage.
Unfortunately, the credibility of marriage suffers when the philosophy and understanding of the population changes. Today's culture of immediate gratification and entitlement is placing strains on marriage, for marriage is not a thing that grants happiness, but a value that one holds true, a means to an end: personal happiness. You don't have to understand this to enter marriage, but you have to understand it to make a marriage work and obtain happiness from it.
From almost losing my marriage, due to my ignorance of life, I know that simply existing in this world provides no happiness; happiness is obtained from efforts and works. Marriage is no different. Being married is nothing, valueing your spouse is everything. What you value you cherish and you work for and you give to. Marriage is no different than parenting, in this respect. It is easy to see the effects of not providing for your children, of not showing them love and kindness, or not guiding them in life; marriage is no different.
People enter into marriage because they pay lip service to the idea, they remain married because they actually act on the idea.