Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
LIQUIDEX TEST RESULTS///Testing info
- Thread starter George Stark
- Start date
Stew Meat said:
Because it is 100% fabricated.
I'll give you boys till tommorrow to figure out how I know...
I'm going to bed...
-Stew
3 things:
1. I tested myown liquidex and it teted fine.
From this, I can think of two things:
1. They could THEORETICALLY be selectively
scamming people. Even though I don't believe
this is so, its a possbility so I can't discount it.
e.g. Samples are sent to specific people to
endorse the product then BAM!!! people start
ordering it and the product is really fake/bunk.
2. Without the Control number I have no idea how you
could find out if the test was fake?
I mean no lab# and control# so how??? I'm still
scratching my head on that one.
3. Just as a thought but does the lab have to repost any
products that violate "patents"??? Thats my best guess.
FYI guys: Arimidex is trademarked by Zeneca labs, and
any lab wishing to produce have to pay royalties and
they're product has to also be approved by Zeneca.
And one thing I definately know about Liquidex is that
it is blatant "patent-infringement". But who cares, if the
product you get is real and has an amazing price.
(Liquidex is basically an "underground product" which
as you know is quite prevalent in the BB'ing world.
Anyways, Fonz out
Godspeed
ORGANON CANON
New member
Stew, let me know 
George Stark
New member
Hmmm
Let The flames begin....LoL
Stew Is that a flamethrower I here?
GS
Let The flames begin....LoL
Stew Is that a flamethrower I here?
GS
ajc
New member
The Ranger said:George,
I must say that is outstanding...this kind of information is always useful....for new and old alike Bro....
Ranger
Normally I don't like to agree with that Ranger homo
(just kidding...but, not about him being a homo...LOL) , but he's right. This is the most solid info I've seen on here in at least 6 months.
S
Stew Meat
Guest
Hmmmm... well, lets see.. where shall I start..
First, I'll say this. I don't know what motivated this guy to post this, but he obviously has some vested interest. I don't know who George Stark is... I did a search for his name to see what his other 64 posts were and the search came up empty. I suspected to find other posts of his endorsing Liquidex. And lets look at this:
I first drew my conclusions from his gaudy storyline which bordered on a literary masterpiece the likes of which Edgar Allen Poe, with his attention to detail and sentence modifiers, would be proud. One speaking about an occurence does not support his sentence with such adjectives and modifiers and uses more linking verbs than action verbs...
By looking at the use of adjectives and attention to detail,psychologists can tell whether a written story has been a creative fabrication. His story line is fabricated. YET, this is NOT by which I derived at the conclusion that his tests were fabricated...
Now for the conclusive evidence. I first became suspecious of his attention to detail... but when I saw his copies of the C of A, I knew something was fishey. So I had a graphics engineer who was completely unbiased look at his "scanned" documents. Does anybody here know how to use Adobe photoshop? What happens when you have text on one layer then place additional layers on top of it in order to paste something else into it (such as a graph or pencil/marker blots)... it gets blurry when you print. I know this first hand. The ONLY way to prevent it from being blurry is to fuse the layers. Otherwise, the top layers will blur the text from the bottom layers. This is exactly what happened. You can CLEARLY see the difference in layer one (text), layer 2 (graphic importation), layer 3 (ink blot over the top of the page), and layer 4 (ink blot over the signature). If you will recall from his epic storyline above, he said that his "friend" had to mark out all evidence of control numbers and the company's name, etc... He also supossedly markered over his signature.
Lets pay particular attention to the signature... NO MARKER has ink that is THAT black. If you will right click on the image and click "properties," you'll see that the pic is a Correl Photohouse Image. Both pics. The BLACK marker over the signature and other ink blotted sections came from Adobe Photoshop... but the text was imported from Correl Word Perfect and the ink blot over the signature is clearly on a different, outermost layer compared with the signature. Look at the font. That is a computer generated image. Now lets move on to concentrate on the second pic. As my friend in the computer graphics industry pointed out, there is NO WAY that ANY scanner no matter how high the quality could have turned over a document with that detail even if it was saved in 10,000 dpi. He says it was done in a text generating program such as Word or Word Perfect. Anyway, look at the ink blots on the top pic as opposed to the ink blots on the bottom pic. The bottom pic was NOT layered. He fused the layers out of Adobe or used some other image gnerating program.. but the clearest indicator of a fabrication was the fact that the ink blots were NOT present in the same manner on the second pic. He used a square blot out instead of the pencil tool...
I will finish this post later by breaking down his entire story and pointing out the contradictions and give aways...
-Stew
First, I'll say this. I don't know what motivated this guy to post this, but he obviously has some vested interest. I don't know who George Stark is... I did a search for his name to see what his other 64 posts were and the search came up empty. I suspected to find other posts of his endorsing Liquidex. And lets look at this:
I recently received a PM from "George Stark" in which he said "I don't believe my friend would go to all of the trouble to create and send himself a lab assay but I guess anything is possable" As we say in Louisiana... "he's crawfishin'!" Hmmm... I wonder who is in competition with him.. who is in competition with the lab who makes liquidex? Also in the PM, I found out WHO HIS FRIEND IS and turns out he is a source who is also a vet on this board. The most obvious reason for his fake C of A would be for insurance... Just in case anyone actually has a real test done on the product and it comes out underdosed he can proclaim tha the has tests that contradict it. Powdered anastrazole is rumored to become availible in a few weeks, but this private lab seems to have gotten the jump on the powder market and composed Liquidex, anastrazole suspension.
I first drew my conclusions from his gaudy storyline which bordered on a literary masterpiece the likes of which Edgar Allen Poe, with his attention to detail and sentence modifiers, would be proud. One speaking about an occurence does not support his sentence with such adjectives and modifiers and uses more linking verbs than action verbs...
he is a good writer nonetheless, but he does not speak from a personal experience... And Cockdezl said my psychology degree wasn't a benefit to my biological background..
By looking at the use of adjectives and attention to detail,psychologists can tell whether a written story has been a creative fabrication. His story line is fabricated. YET, this is NOT by which I derived at the conclusion that his tests were fabricated...Now for the conclusive evidence. I first became suspecious of his attention to detail... but when I saw his copies of the C of A, I knew something was fishey. So I had a graphics engineer who was completely unbiased look at his "scanned" documents. Does anybody here know how to use Adobe photoshop? What happens when you have text on one layer then place additional layers on top of it in order to paste something else into it (such as a graph or pencil/marker blots)... it gets blurry when you print. I know this first hand. The ONLY way to prevent it from being blurry is to fuse the layers. Otherwise, the top layers will blur the text from the bottom layers. This is exactly what happened. You can CLEARLY see the difference in layer one (text), layer 2 (graphic importation), layer 3 (ink blot over the top of the page), and layer 4 (ink blot over the signature). If you will recall from his epic storyline above, he said that his "friend" had to mark out all evidence of control numbers and the company's name, etc... He also supossedly markered over his signature.
Lets pay particular attention to the signature... NO MARKER has ink that is THAT black. If you will right click on the image and click "properties," you'll see that the pic is a Correl Photohouse Image. Both pics. The BLACK marker over the signature and other ink blotted sections came from Adobe Photoshop... but the text was imported from Correl Word Perfect and the ink blot over the signature is clearly on a different, outermost layer compared with the signature. Look at the font. That is a computer generated image. Now lets move on to concentrate on the second pic. As my friend in the computer graphics industry pointed out, there is NO WAY that ANY scanner no matter how high the quality could have turned over a document with that detail even if it was saved in 10,000 dpi. He says it was done in a text generating program such as Word or Word Perfect. Anyway, look at the ink blots on the top pic as opposed to the ink blots on the bottom pic. The bottom pic was NOT layered. He fused the layers out of Adobe or used some other image gnerating program.. but the clearest indicator of a fabrication was the fact that the ink blots were NOT present in the same manner on the second pic. He used a square blot out instead of the pencil tool...
I will finish this post later by breaking down his entire story and pointing out the contradictions and give aways...
-Stew
Bootyshaker
New member
Stew sometimes I believe I would just rather get ripped off without knowing.
Therefore I won't be aware of how much smarter other people are!! lol
good work!!! NOW TELL ME MORE ABOUT THIS POWDER!!!
I guess there is no way you are going to reveal which vet it was.
Bootyshaker
Therefore I won't be aware of how much smarter other people are!! lol
good work!!! NOW TELL ME MORE ABOUT THIS POWDER!!!
I guess there is no way you are going to reveal which vet it was.
Bootyshaker
damescleman
New member
Like Always, Hell of a job Stew!
CRAZYPITBULL
New member
wow.
