Rnch, I'm offended, I am a military historian.....I have academic and street creds....rnch said:re: october 1962.
as a military historian (or at least as close to one here on elite), what do u think about the military's and the executive branch's perfomance during this critical period?![]()
Obviously it was a political poker game. I don't credit Kennedy with smarts, he was just playing poker and won.rnch said:no offense meant
yes, i agree with political poker...but you haven't answered my question, pls?javaguru said:Obviously it was a political poker game. I don't credit Kennedy with smarts, he was just playing poker and won.
I'm too angry about the slandering of my people to answer...rnch said:yes, i agree with political poker...but you haven't answered my question, pls?

javaguru said:I'm too angry about the slandering of my people to answer...![]()
when java is not drunk/on his period?inkspot said:Perhaps I should come back another time..

It does bother me that my loyalty is questioned because of my German heritage, in this day? WTF?rnch said:that's an intelligent answer? LOLOL
I have no bias.....my grandfather raised me with Prussian values and I give my opinion when asked....for me, when my my grandfather emphasized me as "Prussian" I got it...there is a general bias against Germans in every aspect of life, everyone assumes you're a Nazi by expressing anything nationalistic....rnch said:huh? what?? no loyalty questions on THIS thread.....
ohh kayyyyy........but still not the answer to my request for you to critique the miltary and executive branch's performance in october 1982......javaguru said:I have no bias.....my grandfather raised me with Prussian values and I give my opinion when asked....for me, when my my grandfather emphasized me as "Prussian" I got it...there is a general bias against Germans in every aspect of life, everyone assumes you're a Nazi by expressing anything nationalistic....

javaguru said:It does bother me that my loyalty is questioned because of my German heritage, in this day? WTF?
I can evaluate the Cuban crisis as an officer.....it doesn't change the political reality of the day....rnch said:ohh kayyyyy........but still not the answer to my request for you to critique the miltary and executive branch's performance in october 1982......
![]()
Short answer, the soviets needed their ass handed to them. I'm an alpha male and I would have made it clear....nothing insightful...just animal nature.rnch said:thanks for your indepth, penetrating analysis, java![]()
so do u support or decry president Kennedy's decision to blocade and not go for the surgical air strike the joint chief of staff advocated?javaguru said:Short answer, the soviets needed their ass handed to them. I'm an alpha male and I would have made it clear....nothing insightful...just animal nature.
I would have manned up and said we'll invade if you push the issue.rnch said:so do u support or decry president Kennedy's decision to blocade and not go for the surgical air strike the joint chief of staff advocated?
isn't this what president Kennedy more or less told krushchev in their letter exchange?javaguru said:I would have manned up and said we'll invade if you push the issue.
But I'm not a cheating bastard...my word is my bond....rnch said:isn't this what president Kennedy more or less told krushchev in their letter exchange?
ohh kayyyyy....javaguru said:But I'm not a cheating bastard...my word is my bond....

Don't compare my morality with Kennedy...he was the Bill Clinton of his era but at least he chose hawter chicks......rnch said:ohh kayyyyy....![]()
who mentioned comparative morality?javaguru said:Don't compare my morality with Kennedy...he was the Bill Clinton of his era but at least he chose hawter chicks......

probablyrnch said:after re-reading all his vague and off-topic answers; i suspct java's concentration of expertise is limited to the time period of 1939 to 1945 (WW II) ?
yes, he did. the jupiter missles were considered as "obsolete" and had been targeted for removal by President Kennedy for quite some time. they were still there only because of foot dragging my the military.Powerbuilder333 said:Didn't Kennedy make a secret deal with Khrushchev to remove our misslies from the USSR border?
If true, it would appear as if the Soviets won that hand of poker.
Actually, I wrote my bachelor thesis on "How and Why the US Became Involved in the Vietnam Conflict." Kennedy had "unclean" hands, Johnson takes crap from the pop culture for Vietnam but it was Kennedy that put our geopolitical asses on the line. His presidency is highly over rated by the masses. The Cuban Missile crisis was a response by the Soviet Union to NATO threatening the Soviet Union by installing ballistic missiles in Turkey and we never should have come that close to nuclear war. The settling of the crisis required the US withdraw of missiles from Turkey and the Soviet general in charge had pre-delegated use of tactical nukes by Soviet forces in Cuba in the event of a US invasion.Lestat said:probably

didn't President Kennedy, shortly before his murder, issue executive orders to start pulling our "advisors" out of viet nam? orders that were quickly and quietly cancelled as soon as Johson became president?javaguru said:Actually, I wrote my bachelor thesis on "How and Why the US Became Involved in the Vietnam Conflict." Kennedy had "unclean" hands, Johnson takes crap from the pop culture for Vietnam but it was Kennedy that put our geopolitical asses on the line.....
A mere 1,000 troops.....Kennedy increased the number of US troops from 500 advisors to 16,000.I could write a 20 page paper about why Kennedy has Diem's blood on his hands.rnch said:didn't President Kennedy, shortly before his murder, issue executive orders to start pulling our "advisors" out of viet nam? orders that were quickly and quietly cancelled as soon as Johson became president?
historians and confidants close to the Kennedy administation have said that, after his re-election in 1964, President Kennedy was comitted to withdrawing all of our"advisors" in viet nam. his murder by oswald (yeh, rite..javaguru said:A mere 1,000 troops.....Kennedy increased the number of US troops from 500 advisors to 16,000.I could write a 20 page paper about why Kennedy has Diem's blood on his hands.
The Bay Of Pigs invasion would have worked, and no show down with the Soviets would have occuried?rnch said:yes, he did. the jupiter missles were considered as "obsolete" and had been targeted for removal by President Kennedy for quite some time. they were still there only because of foot dragging my the military.
the announcement of their removal was agreed on by all to be delayed 6 months as to not be connected to the russian troop remoival.
today that would not have happened, but the American public was so much more trusting of their elected officials in 1962 than today.
what do ya'll think the current temporary occupant of 1600 penn ave wudda done if in President Kennedy's spot?![]()
java, do u see any parallels betwen the vietnam conflict and our current situation in iraq?javaguru said:Actually, I wrote my bachelor thesis on "How and Why the US Became Involved in the Vietnam Conflict."....
All counter insurgencies bear a resemblance. You can cite Kennedy quotes about supporting freedom and Bush in regard to the war on terror and they are eerily similar. Both had a western cultural bias and lack of understanding of the cultures they were dealing with. I can draw more parallels between the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the first modern war against islamic fundamentalism, and Iraq.rnch said:java, do u see any parallels betwen the vietnam conflict and our current situation in iraq?
rnch said:java, do u see any parallels betwen the vietnam conflict and our current situation in iraq?

Way to geigh up every thread - lol.PICK3 said:java, do you see parallels between the Vietnam conflict and your personal conflict with cumming to terms with your sexuality?![]()
bush hasn't learned from history, has he?javaguru said:All counter insurgencies bear a resemblance. You can cite Kennedy quotes about supporting freedom and Bush in regard to the war on terror and they are eerily similar. Both had a western cultural bias and lack of understanding of the cultures they were dealing with. I can draw more parallels between the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the first modern war against islamic fundamentalism, and Iraq.
president bush has already made it "the hard way" for your generation, lestat, just as president johnson made it rough for your father's generation.Lestat said:war is not the way to fight fundamentalist Islam, it also isn't the way to fight communism. We will learn one way or another, I hope it doesn't have to be the hard way.
rnch said:president bush has already made it "the hard way" for your generation, lestat, just as president johnson made it rough for your father's generation.
"those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it".
I just got an e-mail/news from military.com the Marines are offering 61k bonuses for qualified counter intelligence prospects.rnch said:why would any intelligent man want to join the army or natl' guard right now; what with the strong possibility of being sent over to the sand dunes?
president bush has ruined military service for this generation just as president johnson did for your parent's generation.
javaguru said:Islamic fundamentalism is the new communism.![]()
i have a deviant enough sense of humor that i can laugh at this...

javaguru said:I have no bias.....my grandfather raised me with Prussian values and I give my opinion when asked....for me, when my my grandfather emphasized me as "Prussian" I got it...there is a general bias against Germans in every aspect of life, everyone assumes you're a Nazi by expressing anything nationalistic....
Lestat said:war is not the way to fight fundamentalist Islam, it also isn't the way to fight communism. We will learn one way or another, I hope it doesn't have to be the hard way.
Ignoring the fact that more economically developed countries have lower birth rates in general,France would be another example.hanselthecaretaker said:
that's great lolSpartacus said:
javaguru said:Ignoring the fact that more economically developed countries have lower birth rates in general,France would be another example.
Germany is roughly the size of Ohio and has a population of almost 82.5 million, making it the 14th most populous country, with a slight trend of decline. Ohio has a little more than 11 million people.
I really don't see the various disconnects connecting. I agree that Germans are raised with the holocaust but i don't see the correlation with a low birth rate.
Spartacus said:china faces this problem too
after decades of the 1 child/couple policy
France has been battling low birth rates since WWI. It's an issue in many well developed countries.hanselthecaretaker said:Although the German government has begun to address the issue, it was particularly slow out of the blocks in dealing with its low birthrate, and, since 2003, the contraction of its population, in that first year by just 5,000 people, but in 2006 by 130,000. The German population stands at 82.4 million people.
That was, in part, because almost no debate can proceed unencumbered by the country's Nazi past. Hitler's government gave medals to mothers of large families, gold for those with eight or more children. Uneasiness over the parallels kept the subject of encouraging reproduction on the back burner in Germany for years, unlike in France, where promoting childbearing has long been government policy.
According to European Union statistics, the crude birthrate - defined as births per thousand inhabitants - has declined in Germany in each of the last nine years, from 9.9 in 1997 to 8.2 in 2006. Even after factoring in immigration, the German population is experiencing "exponential negative growth," Klingholz said. The problem is not new - deaths have outnumbered live births in Germany since 1972 - but a muscular response by the government is.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/09/23/news/germany.php
Although, during the late '50's and moreso the '60's both East and West Germany experienced a baby boom of sorts, enough to make the population grow; although that was still considered unusual.
The majority of their population has been progressively aging though for decades, with fewer and fewer younger people. I've read an estimate stating that by 2030, there will be a 1:1 ratio between pensioners and workers. Not good for them.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










