Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

IS your first cycle REALLY your best?

Neo22

New member
Kinda thinking about this lately. Lets take for example one person for his first ever cycle does test. Now lets say another guy takes winstrol only for his first cycle. Both with proper pcts. Thing I'm getting at is, is your first cycle of AAS your best or is your first run with that particular compound your best? Lets say the guy that did the winny only cycle does test 10 weeks later with proper pct, would he still be able to gain the same amount as if test was his first cycle or venture into aas. I know this shit is confusing but I'd like to hear some honest opinions.
 
the reason for the lower amount of AAS as a first cycle is to see how your body handles it. some people's body cant handle it so it would be a bad thing if they jumped into a 1g of test a week and found out they are seriously prone to gyno or their liver cant handle it etc. imop i do not think you get your best gaines off the first cycle. it takes a few to get anywhere significant. this is why we cycle the AAS. so the body's receptors have a chance to recover for the next one. also, different juice does different things to different people. i may have great gaines on 500mg of test but the next guy has crappy gaines and has bad sides from it so he goes with deca for example. or the next guy needs 750mg of test. i hope i am making sense. hope this helps.
 
bigmann245 said:
the reason for the lower amount of AAS as a first cycle is to see how your body handles it. some people's body cant handle it so it would be a bad thing if they jumped into a 1g of test a week and found out they are seriously prone to gyno or their liver cant handle it etc. imop i do not think you get your best gaines off the first cycle. it takes a few to get anywhere significant. this is why we cycle the AAS. so the body's receptors have a chance to recover for the next one. also, different juice does different things to different people. i may have great gaines on 500mg of test but the next guy has crappy gaines and has bad sides from it so he goes with deca for example. or the next guy needs 750mg of test. i hope i am making sense. hope this helps.

I wasn't really talking about dosages per se. Just wondering if since your first cycles your receptors are like "extra fresh." I wouldn't want someone to waste a first cycle on winstrol instead of test if that were the case. See what I'm getting at?
 
i dont believe 1st cycles are always your best.......my best was my 6th cycle, bc at this point i knew more about diet, training and how to take my gear.....and PCT........with the knowlege i have now my 1st cycle wouldve been a whole lot better....tahts what everyone stresses to research before using....
 
ricorico said:
i dont believe 1st cycles are always your best.......my best was my 6th cycle, bc at this point i knew more about diet, training and how to take my gear.....and PCT........with the knowlege i have now my 1st cycle wouldve been a whole lot better....tahts what everyone stresses to research before using....

Then the truth is if you know about the chemical you are doing then it really doesn't matter which one you choose to do for a first cycle if you understand the sides etc... What chemical you choose will be dependent upon your goals. So for instance if you wanted to become harder more vascular and gain small amount of lbm you could do winstrol or var for a first cycle. Then when it came time to bulk and you didn't care about the bloat you could run test.
 
I think that this is right on. I'm currently in the 6th week of my 1st cycle, 500/wk sust. I was expecting more from this, at this point. Strength was up after a couple of weeks, but stagnant now. Since I have zero sides, I'm increasing dosage to 750 right away. It may be the right number for me.

bigmann245 said:
the reason for the lower amount of AAS as a first cycle is to see how your body handles it. some people's body cant handle it so it would be a bad thing if they jumped into a 1g of test a week and found out they are seriously prone to gyno or their liver cant handle it etc. imop i do not think you get your best gaines off the first cycle. it takes a few to get anywhere significant. this is why we cycle the AAS. so the body's receptors have a chance to recover for the next one. also, different juice does different things to different people. i may have great gaines on 500mg of test but the next guy has crappy gaines and has bad sides from it so he goes with deca for example. or the next guy needs 750mg of test. i hope i am making sense. hope this helps.
 
There is usually 'POTENTIAL' to gain alot more on your first one...

If for example after 3-4 cycles you are 30 lbs heavier than when you started then it will be much harder to make drastic body composition changes when you have already added that much extra size first...

Basically its MUCH easier for you to gain muscle the smaller you are :o
 
Oral cycle as a 1st, gained 16 lbs, kept about 11lbs.

On a test/dbol cycle now, gained 13.5 so far, a little over 1/2 way through.

I don't buy the 1st cycle is best argument. I agree with ricorico - if diet/training/rest is spot on, you will gain.


Bluesman
 
Neo22 said:
Kinda thinking about this lately. Lets take for example one person for his first ever cycle does test. Now lets say another guy takes winstrol only for his first cycle. Both with proper pcts. Thing I'm getting at is, is your first cycle of AAS your best or is your first run with that particular compound your best? Lets say the guy that did the winny only cycle does test 10 weeks later with proper pct, would he still be able to gain the same amount as if test was his first cycle or venture into aas. I know this shit is confusing but I'd like to hear some honest opinions.

i think theyre are so many variables thats its impossible to come down all the way on one side or the other, some people respond to some compounds better than others, so for some people they get the best results from a particular drug the first time and dont ever respond exactly the same way if they take that drug again, however it still would be very effective just not as good as with those 'virgin' receptors, in my case my first cycle was very conservative and frankily my results were not that great, so for me fist cycle was not the best
 
khemix said:
I dont think so. On my 3rd cycle I gained 29lbs. On my first I gained 28.

Chris

28lbs your first, 29lbs your third, thats 57lbs....what did you gain your 2nd cycle just for giggles???
 
Top Bottom