Guvna
New member
Is high levels of SHBG post cycle, caused by nolva, a good or bad thing?
I have always been of the mind that it is deleterious to anabolism and recovery, but after reading Drab4's posts on this thread it got me thinking (this is also a very good thread BTW).
http://www.fitnessgeared.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22688&page=3&pp=40&highlight=proviron
He agrues that the more SHBG post cycle (caused by nolva or other PC drugs), is actually a GOOD thing. Here is his reasoning (to me it seems rather sound, but then again I dont know what the hell Im talking about): bounded test has no impact on on HTPA, thereby reducing negative feedback, and causing he body to produce more testostosterone. In theory, now we have a more total bound test in the system, but at the time at nolva cessation, more test becomes unbound. This, again in theory, would be better post-cycle than using SHBG lowering drugs such as proviron PC (assuming that it is not supressive).
What do you guys think? Jenetic?
I have always been of the mind that it is deleterious to anabolism and recovery, but after reading Drab4's posts on this thread it got me thinking (this is also a very good thread BTW).
http://www.fitnessgeared.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22688&page=3&pp=40&highlight=proviron
He agrues that the more SHBG post cycle (caused by nolva or other PC drugs), is actually a GOOD thing. Here is his reasoning (to me it seems rather sound, but then again I dont know what the hell Im talking about): bounded test has no impact on on HTPA, thereby reducing negative feedback, and causing he body to produce more testostosterone. In theory, now we have a more total bound test in the system, but at the time at nolva cessation, more test becomes unbound. This, again in theory, would be better post-cycle than using SHBG lowering drugs such as proviron PC (assuming that it is not supressive).
What do you guys think? Jenetic?

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










