Nelson Montana said:
When people say things like "I think it's not bad" or "in my opinion it's okay" they should at least have an inkling as to WHY they feel that way. More often than not, it's just wishful thinking. All 17AA are liver toxic! END OF STORY. Winstrol has a dramatic effect on lipid profiles! Get your facts straight before offering an opinion with no merit other than it's what you want to believe.
At least Warbird admits he's doing dumb shit and that's his right. But if anyone is seriously taking his advice thinking that it comes from an rational perspective they're going to get burned. Then again, see post #17.
So what are you saying? Did you read why I thought it wouldnt be all that bad to use Var and Winny together? I didnt just stay "Hey yeah i think that be cool" I clearly stated the logic behind it.
I knew about WInny and its affects on blood lipid profiles, but what does thi have to do with stacking winny with var, since people stack winny with just about everything else (or am I missing something here, and is Var worse in general than other AAS on your lipid profile? ) So by saying "Winny has a dramatic effect on lipid profiles!" do you mean to say that its so bad that it shouldnt be stacked with any other AAS, so as not exarcerbate the problem further? Or are you saying one shouldnt use winny at all? I mean, really what was the point of mentioning that? We are discussing liver hepatoxicity not lipid profles. Id think other AAS commonly used with winny would have aworse effect on blood lipids than Var...but am I wrong? Is Var really the Black Death of BBing?
Back to original post. I said the reason why i think his dose isnt all that because I didnt think 80mg of Var+Winny could be any worse than say 100mg of Winny or 100mg of Drol which are commen dosages for those drugs. Ok, Var is 17aa, got it, great (though I knew this already too), now that that point has been beaten to the ground, so are you saying that all 17aa's are created equal? 50mg of Var is just as bad as 50mg of Winny? as bad as 50mg Dbol? as bad as 50mg of Drol? as bad as 50mg of Halo? Again did my facts miss something here? I was under the impression that 17aa's dont have a set level of hepatoxicity, that it varies from drug to drug (although the all do have a certain level of hepatoxicity). Was I wrong about this? 50mg of Var really is as bad for the liver as 50mg of Halo? 100mg of Winny is as bad as 100mg of Drol? as bad as 50mg of Var and 50mg of Winny?
Wait your hang up really is on 40mg of Var + 40mg of Winny. Well thats only 80mg of 17aa's. If all 17aa are created equal as far as hepatoxicity goes, then why is it not a problem for people to take 100mg of Drol and not ok to take 80mg (less than 100mg) of Var + Winny? Oh wait, you mean to say that theres something about actually mixing two 17aa's that has some sort of synegistically bad effect on the liver? By mixing 2 17aa's, regardless of dose used will be alot worse than using a higher dose of any single one?
Now Im not just trying to be a smart ass about this. Im actually being serious. Alot of vets here seem to have this hang up, so maybe I really am missing something, so can you please explain?
Points Understood, they dont need to be mentioned again:
1. Var is 17aa
2. all 17aas are hepatoxic to some degree
3. Winny is bad for blood lipid levels.
Please dont discuss this again, its been beaten into the ground.
Points I need clarification on:
1. Are all 17aas created equal as far as hepatoxicity goes (ie 50mg of Var as bad as 50mg of Winny as bad as 50mg of Dbol as Bad as 50mg of Drol as bad as 50mg of Halo)?
2. If all 17aas are created equal in hepatoxctiy why is 80mg of Winny + Var worse than 100mg of Drol or 100mg of Winny alone? OR
3. In there some kind of effect that happens when mixing two 17aa's that will make them more hepatoxic at equal levels (ie 40mg of Var + 40mg of Winny worse than 100mg of Drol)?