Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Is 200 mg eq week a waste?

Bam Bam said:
200 mg week while running trenbolone and Winstrol - stanozolol....Is it a waste. Don't want to spend a fortune. Bam


NO, NOT AT ALL! Look at my pictures. That was done on 200mg EQ a week and 200mg test prop a week. I don't know why others bash a low does of juice. What is it with getting too big too fast on a rediculous amount of juice in a short amount of time? Hogwash.
 
Para_Shoot said:
NO, NOT AT ALL! Look at my pictures. That was done on 200mg Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - a week and 200mg test testosterone propionate a week. I don't know why others bash a low does of juice. What is it with getting too big too fast on a rediculous amount of juice in a short amount of time? Hogwash.

Dude... 200mg a week??? Are you serious??? I would consider that a complete waste of time. I consider myself conservative on the dosing but 200??
 
Butterbob said:
Dude... 200mg a week??? Are you serious??? I would consider that a complete waste of time. I consider myself conservative on the dosing but 200??
that is why he is asking bro. but we all react differently to dose size. what works for some does not work for others.
 
400 wasn't enough for me either, 750 gave me insane results but a little anxiety too.
 
I have used 200mg wk just to smooth out painful gear ,that wasnt a waste ,did i see gains from it prob not just the test it was much smoother .

Brad.
 
Para_Shoot said:
NO, NOT AT ALL! Look at my pictures. That was done on 200mg Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - a week and 200mg test testosterone propionate a week. I don't know why others bash a low does of juice. What is it with getting too big too fast on a rediculous amount of juice in a short amount of time? Hogwash.


For how long? if it was 8-10 weeks, those gains were probably just from the propionate. I'm not a scientist, but from people's experience, a drug like EQ is ineffective at that dosage.

Is like if a doc tell you take one pill daily, and you just take a quarter of a pill. The effect is placebo.
 
Butterbob said:
Dude... 200mg a week??? Are you serious??? I would consider that a complete waste of time. I consider myself conservative on the dosing but 200??

All I can say is look at my pic with my girl poolside. Of course I ate super clean and I did and continue to do cardio. I am a FIRM believer in slow, steady pace with low doses for a long ass period of time. Once you have checked out my pic, let me know if you still think 200mg EQ is a waste. I'm not flaming you, I love debates and standing up for what I believe in.
 
Bump---trying to find a consensus on minimum dose effectiveness. Going to be doing test/equ cycle soon. 250mg test and ? on equ.
 
Para_Shoot said:
All I can say is look at my pic with my girl poolside. Of course I ate super clean and I did and continue to do cardio. I am a FIRM believer in slow, steady pace with low doses for a long ass period of time. Once you have checked out my pic, let me know if you still think 200mg Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - is a waste. I'm not flaming you, I love debates and standing up for what I believe in.


I could show you pics of fine ass bitches with ugly mother fuckers, you could just have a fat wallet and look like shit. Honestly why would you risk shutting your body down for 200mg of eq? And then shutting it down for a long ass time? 200mg a week of eq is good for a girl. Personally through blood work and experience I've noticed I get better results with 6 week cycles around a gram or a touch more a week. Thats total amounts with 2 or 3 compounds not eq.
 
Para_Shoot said:
NO, NOT AT ALL! Look at my pictures. That was done on 200mg Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - a week and 200mg test testosterone propionate a week. I don't know why others bash a low does of juice. What is it with getting too big too fast on a rediculous amount of juice in a short amount of time? Hogwash.
Dood it was the 200mg of test that did it.
 
needtogetaas said:
Dood it was the 200mg of test that did it.

You think? Well, if it was the test then so it be. Just goes to show that you do not need a gram of test a week to look good. I'm not the biggest guy around, but I'm one of the best looking guys around..hehe
 
Para_Shoot said:
You think? Well, if it was the test then so it be. Just goes to show that you do not need a gram of test a week to look good. I'm not the biggest guy around, but I'm one of the best looking guys around..hehe

maybe that 200mg of eq contributes to his huge ego
 
big_daws said:
maybe that 200mg of Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - contributes to his huge ego

Hey, I'm proud of what I accomplished and the way I look on so little juice. So what if I stayed on it for two years straight. That was also two straight years of intense cardio, intense super clean eating and practically no drinking and a slow, steady dose of juice. We all work hard to look good, isn't that what drives us..at least most of the time?
 
Para_Shoot said:
Hey, I'm proud of what I accomplished and the way I look on so little juice. So what if I stayed on it for two years straight. That was also two straight years of intense cardio, intense super clean eating and practically no drinking and a slow, steady dose of juice. We all work hard to look good, isn't that what drives us..at least most of the time?

I agree different strokes for different folks.
 
Bam Bam said:
200 mg week while running trenbolone and Winstrol - stanozolol....Is it a waste. Don't want to spend a fortune. Bam

300-400mgWK MINIMUM IMO
 
it would shut you down but what about using it strictly to improve appetite? at 200 per week, would you experience increased appetite as a side? that would def help with anything you stacked it with or is it worth it at all? bty, i have no experience w eq, just asking a question
 
Para_Shoot said:
Hey, I'm proud of what I accomplished and the way I look on so little juice. So what if I stayed on it for two years straight. That was also two straight years of intense cardio, intense super clean eating and practically no drinking and a slow, steady dose of juice. We all work hard to look good, isn't that what drives us..at least most of the time?


I hope you were using hcg through out the 2 years. I would think being shut down for 2 years is way worse on your body than 8 weeks of 600mg a week. Do a search on what natty test does in your body besides building muscle, then decide if longer is better irregardless of the amount.
 
Para_Shoot said:
All I can say is look at my pic with my girl poolside. Of course I ate super clean and I did and continue to do cardio. I am a FIRM believer in slow, steady pace with low doses for a long ass period of time. Once you have checked out my pic, let me know if you still think 200mg Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - is a waste. I'm not flaming you, I love debates and standing up for what I believe in.

I still think 200mg EQ is a waste. Congrats on your ho's. If you ever decide to rent out your ego let me know. I have an ugly cousin who could use some.
 
200mg of eq does work but it will be over the course of 16-20 weeks
even then the results are very slow building when one bust his ass he can achieve decent results.

I have seen decent results with as little as 200mg of test a week

diff cycle 200mg of deca a week ran alone

then an eq 200mg a week alone

Most of the results are when dieting down to keep muscle mass and achieve a lean look..

If your trying to build boat loads of muscle then no 200mg of anything test,deca or eq would not be logical but for a little boost between cycles or someone that wants the low dosage look 200mg of eq would work but you have to bust your ass and keep the protein high
 
chazk said:
200mg of Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - does work but it will be over the course of 16-20 weeks
even then the results are very slow building when one bust his ass he can achieve decent results.

I have seen decent results with as little as 200mg of test a week

diff cycle 200mg of Deca-Durabolin - nandrolone decanoate - a week ran alone

then an Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - 200mg a week alone

Most of the results are when dieting down to keep muscle mass and achieve a lean look..

If your trying to build boat loads of muscle then no 200mg of anything test,Deca-Durabolin - nandrolone decanoate - or Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - would not be logical but for a little boost between cycles or someone that wants the low dosage look 200mg of Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - would work but you have to bust your ass and keep the protein high
Hey bud,
Would 300mg add anything to a 250mg test cycle?
 
funny how people keep posting until someone gives them the answer that they want to hear....200mg of EQ is too low even for someone going with low doses a waste of cash and juice. i woudlnt go lower then 400mg/wk and that will be ultra mild
 
Sure 600mg EQ PW is the standard as part of a growth cycle, but 200mg is not a waste as that dose will help with collogen synthesis. Most here would agree that EQ is a compound best mixed with others & is a relatively mild AAS & in some cases not even that effective at 600mg or more PW. I like running it with TestE, deca & winny inj great synergy if you can stand the night sweats (as bad as on tren) & the shit ass acne.
 
Butterbob said:
I still think 200mg Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - is a waste. Congrats on your ho's. If you ever decide to rent out your ego let me know. I have an ugly cousin who could use some.


that is fucking funny
 
Acela said:
that is fucking funny


Well, I guess if your buying your Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - from some website on the net it might be a waste of cash at 200mg a week but for me it wasn't a waste of cash because it only cost me $3.00 a bottle to make homebrew style. I can do better than rent you my ego Butter Ball Bob (like it's really for your cousin)..I can sell you my juice plan and my training routine. Give me $500 for everything and I'll show you how to be me.
 
lazer84 said:
Hey bud,
Would 300mg add anything to a 250mg test cycle?
if someone is a low dosage user
250mg of test and 300mg of eq would be a great first or second stack,

what happens often in the world of body building is guys use dbol ,anadrol or 1gram+ of test a week and throw on 20lbs+ during their cycles.

so for them to use 250mg of test and 300mg of eq and gain a nice soild 5lbs to them is considered a " waste or time "
But what they do not get is by doing these small low dosage cycles
you keep pretty much all your gains and by doing them 2 times a year over 2-3 years you can build a nice physic with out the yo-yo up and down weight gain .

Usually steroid users fall into 3 ranks
low dosage
moderate dosage
high/abuse dosage

To anwser your question would 250g of test and 300mg if eq be could cycle
the best thing is to run the cycle and find out for your self
some guys blow up like a weed on low dosages some guys need more
 
chazk said:
if someone is a low dosage user
250mg of test and 300mg of Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - would be a great first or second stack,

what happens often in the world of body building is guys use Dianabol - methandrostenolone - ,anadrol or 1gram+ of test a week and throw on 20lbs+ during their cycles.

so for them to use 250mg of test and 300mg of Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - and gain a nice soild 5lbs to them is considered a " waste or time "
But what they do not get is by doing these small low dosage cycles
you keep pretty much all your gains and by doing them 2 times a year over 2-3 years you can build a nice physic with out the yo-yo up and down weight gain .

Usually steroid users fall into 3 ranks
low dosage
moderate dosage
high/abuse dosage


To anwser your question would 250g of test and 300mg if Equipoise - boldenone undecylenate - be could cycle
the best thing is to run the cycle and find out for your self
some guys blow up like a weed on low dosages some guys need more

you make a good point--and within those ranks the question is whether the specific rank is the correct for their specific goals and their body's response to the gear.

which sort of makes the case for a site like this--if one size fit all--who would need any personal input
 
eddymerckx said:
you make a good point--and within those ranks the question is whether the specific rank is the correct for their specific goals and their body's response to the gear.

which sort of makes the case for a site like this--if one size fit all--who would need any personal input


Thats spot on .

For me i get great gains on low dose test , but not so much E,Q , big gains on low dose B,Dol , not so much on var , and some off my mates are totally different you just got to test the waters a bit .


Brad.
 
Top Bottom