IGF-1 Medical studies on IM usage vs. Sub-Q

[MR. BMJ]

For constructiveness toward the thread though, I like Hcg much better sub-Q. That is from my own personal experience.

I've never used IGF of any form.

BMJ

 

[shivastool]

I understand that IGF sub-q can cause nodules (bb-sized pebbles) at the inj. site. Not so with IM.

 

[Shinobi]

I understand that IGF sub-q can cause nodules (bb-sized pebbles) at the inj. site. Not so with IM.

Welts are sign of bad quality IGF-1
IGF is much better IM in the muscle that you will train

 

[krishna]

I've been unable to find medical studies showing either one is more effective, IM or subcutanous injections of IGF-1. I've also viewed some studies on IGF-1 and they didn't specify there the form of injection (IM, SubQ or IV). If anyone has reliable information I would really appreciate it.

I would prefer sub-q because I'm sick of being a pincusion and have too much to injection as it is and too much scar tissue. Even with HCG I prefer to go sub-q although IM has been shown better, I'd just prefer taking a slighly higher dosage of HCG subcutanously than hcg IM.

Anyone have references?

IM with igf, and subq with hcg. Both are better and more effective that way.