Now I'm genuinely intrigued. Is it considered a viololation of: "an it harm none, do what thou will" if you take something from someone and give it to someone else?
From MY perspective: Harm is different from
Hurt. Harm is extreme, intense, life changing trauma type experiences (as in, the fact my father beat my mother caused me permanent psychological harm).
Hurt is, life wise, stubbing your toe. Taking something from someone, like, say, a wallet, falls under the category of hurt. Causing someone to lose their business and livelihood, destroying them financially so their life is in ruins, that's harm.
If you're talking something like adultery (i.e., "that woman took my husband away from me") I see that as a two way street because I honestly don't believe you can "take" anyone's spouse away from them if the marriage is inherently sound (and everyone I know whose been involved on one side or the other of adulterous or cheating relationships agrees, although sometimes it takes a long time for the "wronged" party to accept this reality).
And the funny thing is, depending on who you're talking to, and which of the various Heathen/Pagan/Neopagan/Witch/Wiccan/Voudon/Etc./Etc. paths they follow, you could (and probably will) get a different answer. The primary thing that makes the various neopagan paths different from conventional religion
IS the lack of dogma. Of course, the lack of dogma is precisely why people who prefer/need structured paradigms is why they feel it is acceptable to dismiss us and the validity of our beliefs.
Pagan beliefs harken back to a time in human existence when we were more tribal, and each of those tribes had their traditions. Just because the traditions (and gods) varied from one tribe to another that didn't invalidate them. From the pagan perspective, expecting everyone on the planet to worship ONE god, in ONE manner is every bit as stupid as expecting everyone on the planet to eat ONE food prepared using the same recipe every day of their lives.