Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

I will find it extremely suspicious if there is another terrorist attack

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frackal
  • Start date Start date
F

Frackal

Guest
During this time of controversy over the Iraq situation...as many of us know, other wars that were not popular were started using some sort of attack on our military or civilian installations... according to our buddies Ridge and Ashcroft, this is the most serious stage of alert we've had... aside from the horror of another actual attack, I will be extremely disturbed if there is one, and then an angry population wanting something to lash out against and a sympathetic UN agrees to the Iraqi invasion...I truly hope this does not happen..but we shall see I guess.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if you got my point NB.... I meant if we are attacked within the next few months here in the US it would likely tip things over to more full support for the war on Iraq... things of a somewhat similiar nature have happened before from our govt. so it concerns me....ie, an attack being allowed to occur to plunge us into the war...
 
That would be unusually aggressive. The thought has occurred to me and I'm sure many others.

I'm a young buck who has lived the good life in the US. This is the most screwed up situation I've ever seen by about 10 fold.
 
2Thick said:
You might as well start packing the winter clothes for your move to Canada, guys.


I've tried to convince my fiance to move there but she hates the cold so I guess I'm kinda stuck here. Hell she's never even seen snow
 
Frackal said:
Not sure if you got my point NB.... I meant if we are attacked within the next few months here in the US it would likely tip things over to more full support for the war on Iraq... things of a somewhat similiar nature have happened before from our govt. so it concerns me....ie, an attack being allowed to occur to plunge us into the war...

oh I see what you're saying.

remember the anthrax shit? I think that is EXACTLY what you are talking about. what kind of bullshit is this that they couldnt catch the guy who was doing it? and they also traced the anthrax from Ft Detrich, maryland. It was an inside job.
 
No suspicions needed! There will be an attack in the next twenty days. Methods Ricin, Suicide bombing NY and LA. Assationation attempts in DC.

Terrorist Chatter similiar to before Kenya, Cole, 911, and Balli.

Corona, CA
44,000 pounds of powdered boric acid was stolen
February 9, 2003

Osama Tape
February 12, 2003

Eid-ul-Adha (Muslim Holiday)
February 12, 2003

Gulf War II
March 3, 2003

Islamic New Year
March 4, 2003

DCUPNSA
 
Last edited:
2Thick said:
You might as well start packing the winter clothes for your move to Canada, guys.

when hell freezes over.
 
Last edited:
2Thick said:
You might as well start packing the winter clothes for your move to Canada, guys.

Not me lol, Im close enough to freaking Canada already, fucking cold here today
 
Frackal said:
Not sure if you got my point NB.... I meant if we are attacked within the next few months here in the US it would likely tip things over to more full support for the war on Iraq... things of a somewhat similiar nature have happened before from our govt. so it concerns me....ie, an attack being allowed to occur to plunge us into the war...

Frackle, do you really think we're waiting that long to go in an bust up Iraq? I'd say right now that we're maybe 2-3 weeks tops away from heading in there. The government has already made up its mind to go ahead and have this war. They wouldn't have spent the billions of dollars it took to send our forces over there if they didn't fully plan on following through.
 
My bad I should have said weeks...which is actually the timeframe...the end of Hatch or whatever the hell it is....
 
Frackal said:
an attack being allowed to occur to plunge us into the war...

An attack being allowed to occur is not what I'm afraid of, it's an attack on us perpetrated by our own government.

But, if they were smart, the U.S. would plant a bomb in another country and blame it on Al-Quaeda and Hussein. that would get everyone else on board.
 
I have no doubt that there are some people in the higher levels of our gov't who would love to see another terrorist attack on U S soil......
 
The warning is just insurance. When something does happen they will say "see we told you to be careful." They have to do this because of the heat over 9-11. If they say nothing people jump on them, when something happens and if they did not say something like they are doing now people say it's fishy. It's a no win situation.
 
Frackal said:
During this time of controversy over the Iraq situation...as many of us know, other wars that were not popular were started using some sort of attack on our military or civilian installations... according to our buddies Ridge and Ashcroft, this is the most serious stage of alert we've had... aside from the horror of another actual attack, I will be extremely disturbed if there is one, and then an angry population wanting something to lash out against and a sympathetic UN agrees to the Iraqi invasion...I truly hope this does not happen..but we shall see I guess.

And what if no attack happens? You will still be suspicious. You are just pretending to be open minded when your opinions are already set in stone. The fact that all the muslims aka terrorists will be pissed by an Iraq war and would see it as a reason to commit an act of terrorism seems less likely to you then our own government killing its citizens. Someone who thinks like that there is no point in reasoning with.
 
The thought of this -- although very disturbing -- is not that far of a reach IMO. I have no doubt that it's happened before. I try not to think that such things are possible because it makes me ill but in my heart of hearts, I know they are. Considering the resistance we're seeing around the world right now, an attack on US soil would appear to some to give the US justification to attack Iraq.

bigguns7 said:


An attack being allowed to occur is not what I'm afraid of, it's an attack on us perpetrated by our own government.


I believe there's not much of a difference bro.

One thing is for sure, a lot of innocent people are going to be injured and die.

I believe this is a critical and pivotal time in the history and fate of our world. All things considered, nothing that has ever come even close to this. The real unfortunate part of it all to me is that I don't see a light at the end of the tunnel, so to speak. I mean how could any of this result in a good ending? I just don't see it.
 
Re: Re: I will find it extremely suspicious if there is another terrorist attack

VicTusDeuS said:
So I guess the US was responcible for 9-11 too?:rolleyes:

Never said that and responsible is spelled with an S.






MortyJackson said:


And what if no attack happens? You will still be suspicious. You are just pretending to be open minded when your opinions are already set in stone. The fact that all the muslims aka terrorists will be pissed by an Iraq war and would see it as a reason to commit an act of terrorism seems less likely to you then our own government killing its citizens. Someone who thinks like that there is no point in reasoning with.


That is not entirely correct Morticia... at this point if an attack did happen I would be extremely suspicous at the timing, largely becaue history has shown us that other attacks on our nation were allowed to occur in order to sway the public opinion...

I'm actually a little unsure of my position on the Bush adminstration... (though I know for sure I dislike ashcroft)... I am currently reading "Bush at War" by Bob Woodward, which is a good read though it does read more like a press campaign for Bush's goodness...but who knows...perhaps that is a realistic potrayal of the administration...it's hard to say what reality really is...I do like Condoleeza Rice from what I've seen though...respect Rumsfeld's intelligence and articulation skills...like Colin Powell too from what I've seen.

I do believe that Saddamn needs to go, hopefully a better leader is installed... but now? And without the support of the world? I'm not so sure about that...I find it hard to believe that if Saddam is actively trying to produce all these WMDs that our massive intelligence facilities still have not found conclusive proof of such...but who knows

But I also do not trust the motivations of our government .... I find with the track record, it is foolish to do so automatically... where are you on the sticky thread about ashcroft's new DS bill?

Surely as a conservative you value your civil liberties more than anything? Why have we seen the one of the largest revocations of civil liberties under the Bush admin in the history of the United States?
 
Re: Re: Re: I will find it extremely suspicious if there is another terrorist attack

Frackal said:

And without the support of the world?

The world is mostly made up of third world poverty ridden countries. Many are jealous of America's success and would like to see America fail. There is no denying that they do not look out for our interests. Therefore we must do things ourselves when we want. The "world" does not decide American foreign policy.
 
Frackal,

The senior US Government official complicity theory in the sept 11th attacks, would predict just an event you described.
 
buddy28 said:
Frackal,

The senior US Government official complicity theory in the sept 11th attacks, would predict just an event you described.

please explain more on the sr us gov official complicity theory-- who it comes from and what is the stance and reasoning. I've heard a lot of conspiracy theoris and the "official theory" but I am not entirely convinced that Bin Laden was behind 9-11
 
Top Bottom