I have posted about this before.. but here goes AGAIN!!! the presidency is a ....

[atlantabiolab]

the people pic what media tells them too... and who controls media?

lol its right in front of your face man


BO-DEN

So, then why, if the media controls YOUR actions (although you attempted to insinuate that genes control your actions...kinda contradictory, huh?), are YOU not fulfilling your command given to YOU by this all-powerful media?? This has always been a glitch in the ideas of "conspiratorial control"; the simple question of "well why are you not under their powerful influence?"

The answer is very simple: while many people ACCEPT mediocrity, and never attempt to better themselves, this is a far cry from "control". All of the populace have the ABILITY to better themselves, the ABILITY to delve deeper into the issues, the ABILITY to choose beyond what is merely presented to them, the fact of the matter is that they simply CHOOSE not to.

You can present all manner of conspiratorial theories, but until you accept the fact that man will WILLINGLY be led astray, will VOLUNTARILY choose to not think, then you have not considered the most elementary, simple reasoning for the current state of things.

 

[atlantabiolab]

That is so laughable that even YOU have to admit it.BY THE PEOPLE?Which people?Do you honestly believe that the average white collar,tax-paying american has a say so in the actual representitive candidate?All we have is a limited list of Eliteists who have the biggest campaign funds to get their faces shown on TV.We may not die if we don't vote for scum,but when all you have is special interest-A and special interest-B,and no alternative choice,well you get the picture.

Please tell us why people HAVE to vote for candidate "X" or "Y"? Who or what is FORCING them to do this? Do you only think in terms of what is presented to you?

Why could the populace NOT vote a Nader, or a Green Party, or a Libertarian Party candidate?? What, or whom, is preventing them from doing this??

You can't use this argument that the candidates from these lesser parties are not visual enough; the general public knows that there are other alternative parties out there, they simply don't want to take the time to investigate them. They ACCEPT the two party system and voluntarily dismiss anything else.

I don't; what is your excuse for people like me? Am I being controlled by some other force that prevents me from following the carrot presented by the "media"?

 

[BO-DEN]

So, then why, if the media controls YOUR actions (although you attempted to insinuate that genes control your actions...kinda contradictory, huh?), are YOU not fulfilling your command given to YOU by this all-powerful media?? This has always been a glitch in the ideas of "conspiratorial control"; the simple question of "well why are YOU not under their powerful influence?".

you keep saying "YOU". im talking about the common american i dont want what the common american wants.(you should know this more then anyone on this bored)

so this quote has no grounds for a real responce

You can present all manner of conspiratorial theories, but until you accept the fact that man will WILLINGLY be led astray, will VOLUNTARILY choose to not think, then you have not considered the most elementary, simple reasoning for the current state of things.

this is not news to me. but the truth being that i can show people truth. then good for the ones that want to join the people who choose life instead of illusion..

you always try and proove my contridiction..

it seemed like you dont believe that my "theroy" that i have shown evidence to prove is not credible yet you do believe that people "will WILLINGLY be led astray, will VOLUNTARILY choose to not think"

well if they are led astray and lied to and shielded from reality why is this so far fetched to you.... i think its you that needs to face facts old boy


BO-DEN

 

[SUPERDIMI]

every president we have ever had was a mason..
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/US_Presidents/US_Presidents03.htm

so i wonder if they have the same "mentally brain dead" opinon about you and me?



I BET SO

BO-DEN

It's not a big suprise that you have a masonory link just readily available confirming pretty much where you are coming from. BTW, that link hardly states that all the U.S. presidents were masons. It lists a bunch of white guys from the late 1800's to the mid-1940's and I don't know what that is supposed to mean.

Without a doubt, U.S. history has a strong base of racism and masonry was founded by a klansman. I don't really care what they think of me. It seems to me that there is a goal within the mason organization to keep black men's minds occupied with bullshit to thwart personal development. The people that are really in charge are laughing.

"Many come but, few are chosen." I don't buy it bro. My friend tried to get me to become a mason too. I would rather spend my energy trying to make the best life for myself as possible and developing/keeping a piece of mind.

 

[BO-DEN]

masonry was founded by a klansman.

what "link" did you get this information? lol freemasonry dates back to ancent egypt.

the KKK was a furternal order started by MASONS but not the other way around.

 

[SUPERDIMI]

what "link" did you get this information? lol freemasonry dates back to ancent egypt.

the KKK was a furternal order started by MASONS but not the other way around.

Your right. I misread something. Actually, I got that info from my friend's mother. It sounded like she knew what she was talking about.(lol)

Can't say that this subject doesn't have a lot of interesting things to read about.

Where are you getting that freemasonry dates back to ancient egypt though? I don't see it. I see a lot of different theories about when freemasonry began. That range is somewhere between 1600-1739 though, not ancient egypt. I see that freemasonry might have borrowed from ancient egypt. What you mean, there was a pharoah that was a mason? Show me any link showing that freemasonry began in ancient egypt.

I still say the real people in power don't pay this shit any mind and they are laughing at those that do. Sorry.

 

[BO-DEN]

Where are you getting that freemasonry dates back to ancient egypt though? I don't see it. I see a lot of different theories about when freemasonry began. That range is somewhere between 1600-1739 though, not ancient egypt. I see that freemasonry might have borrowed from ancient egypt. What you mean, there was a pharoah that was a mason? Show me any link showing that freemasonry began in ancient egypt..

not many "links" have real information on freemasonry. the books written for freemasonry are were i get most of my information. ill pm you a list of books (hard to find or buy).

any koo koo with a key board can spew bullshit websites.

I still say the real people in power don't pay this shit any mind and they are laughing at those that do. Sorry.

Dont worry buddy im not offended, this comming from someone stating
that the KKK started the ancent ferternal order of freemasonry.... i think that more of your "real people in power" would be laughing at you and wear your getting your information.



BO-DEN

 

[BO-DEN]

LONDON, England (Reuters) -- The U.S. presidential election will be largely fought over Iraq and the economy, but if royal genes have anything to do with the result, Democrat John Kerry is destined to dethrone George W. Bush this November.


According to a theory its British proponents say has proved surprisingly accurate over the past century, the candidate with the bluest blood in his veins will win the White House. In 2000 it was Bush. This time, it's Kerry.

"Our research is not yet complete but my bet is that Kerry has more royal connections and that he is more noble than President Bush," said Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke's Peerage, a guide to the aristocracy.

"But both candidates have a remarkable number of royal connections and both are related to (Britain's) Queen Elizabeth," he added.

Kerry, a Yale-educated war hero from Massachusetts, has all but wrapped up the Democratic nomination and is preparing to take on Republican Bush in what many believe will be the most bitterly fought presidential campaign in history.

The 60-year-old can trace his roots back to the first Massachusetts governor, John Winthrop, to every great family in Boston and to a host of royals in Europe, but has worked hard to dispel the notion he is a Northern liberal elitist.

"Kerry can almost certainly be traced back to King James I and to the bloodlines straight through the Windsor and Hanover families," Brooks-Baker said.

James I, the son of Mary, Queen of Scots, ruled from 1603-1625 and is best remembered for commissioning a new translation of the Bible, the Authorized King James's Version. James was king at the time of the 1605 gunpowder plot when Catholic Guy Fawkes and his band tried to blow up king and parliament.

Although Kerry's family tree might have more royal branches than Bush's, the president himself is no commoner.

Bush was more royal than Al Gore, his opponent four years ago, and also boasts a direct descent from Henry III and from Henry VIII's sister Mary Tudor, who was also the wife of Louis XI of France. He is also descended from Charles II of England.

Brooks-Baker said there has always been a significant "royalty factor" in those who aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan among others all with strong blue blood links.

"The chance of winning certainly seems much higher with more royal connections and one could make a big case that royal genes or chromosomes will tell," Brooks-Baker said.


BO-DEN

 

[SUPERDIMI]

Dont worry buddy im not offended, this comming from someone stating
that the KKK started the ancent ferternal order of freemasonry.... i think that more of your "real people in power" would be laughing at you and wear your getting your information.



BO-DEN

I seriously doubt it.(BTW its fraternal, now I get a chance to laugh back at you ) And I just don't buy that knowing all the behind the scenes truth is just matter of joining a lodge and moving up in rank in the mason organization. All of it is worth a closer look though. BTW, my Uncle was a mason and he didn't feel that it was the "insider" place to be.

I didn't think you would get offended. You seem cool than mf'er, but, I don't agree with that mason stuff. I'll read the books just because I still find it interesting and its at least worth a closer look.

I read "behold a pale horse" and thought it was nonsense. I don't know if the guy who wrote that was a mason. The point is, just because someone claims to know the real truth does not mean they are speaking it. I see that only people who care about that mason stuff are the people away from power thinking that the real people in power are all masons. I don't know how it was back in the day. Yeah, people were probably a mason, a part-time klansmen, and whatever.

Any koo koo could post something they got off the internet? Damn, you think? LOL I'm kidding bro.

You're alright though. I don't really post on this board so I'll see you around.

 

[BO-DEN]

I see that only people who care about that mason stuff are the people away from power thinking that the real people in power are all masons. I

tell that to that to the president... powerful people dont talk about it so people dont rebel against the system that inprisons them.

good luck

BO-DEN