Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

I have posted about this before.. but here goes AGAIN!!! the presidency is a ....

HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:
ABL-You are officially inducted into sheepdomville...It's exactly your type of thinking that has created the current monster who is ruling over the people,and why folks who aren't born with a silver spoon in their mouth will never have a say in which direction the country they live in is headed.The common man is a moron?If he follows with out question like you and thinks everything is hunky dory despite all the f*cked up things his 'leaders' are steering his country into,then perhaps you are correct.Our current 'representational' system is a nightmare,as they certainly are not representing anyone but themselves and those close to them-The Elite.

Sad.

Really Huck? Have you ever read, or if you have, comprehended my posts?? Please show me where I give acceptance to our current situation and administration??

As for my comment about the "common man", I stand. He is a moron. HE elected George Bush into office AND voted for Gore. HE supports this administration AND wants to vote in "anybody but Bush". HE supports militarization around the world AND wants to dismantle our military and spend this money on "healthcare", "the environment", "alternative fuels", "education", etc.

The common man is the problem with our country; he is blind to reality, rejecting of reasoned thought, and led by others. If a man comes out of the realm of the "common man" and becomes successful, can he be any longer called "common"?
 
LOL!And your solution is?

You seemed to be defending the selection process of these eliteist incumants,hence my above statements.It's a joke.
 
Last edited:
atlantabiolab said:
Bo-den has officially lost it :mix: Now I know why you are so fixated on your "law of the jungle" mindset; you are preparing for the Invasion.

you know every time some tells me how crazy i am for bringing new or unpopular ideas to what is now your tiny little world.

i remember at one time it was INSANE :mix: to think:

-the world was round
-the sun revolved around the sun instead of vise versa
-jesus was a massiah
on and on... people thaught einstien was crazy for his theorys on dark matter and so on.

so you trying to discredit me with Your trivial opinion.. its very amusing

im in good company.


The problem with this idea, that of President's being all of some "royal" bloodline, is that historically, such blood lines were cultivated, they were prepared from birth to be kings and queens. The country knew who were the "chosen" lineage.

the only differance in this theory is that the contry dosnt know about the arranged marrige.

if it was public knowledge they certinly couldnt call this a domocracy, could they?

they have evidence that 14 first wives were all of the same line.




America's presidents, even if related, is only coincidental, since you would have to believe that each of these random, but genetically related, brethren were being culled from birth to become the president; unless of course you believe that somehow "genes" are responsible for presidency. George Bush, and father, came from wealth; Bill Clinton did not. George Washington was well to do, Andrew Johnson was an indentured servant in his younger years.

all the presidents were not of the same family. thats explained in some of the artical.

and i believe genes are responcible for most human affairs

and we have a class sysytem we pretend isnt there. poor bloodlines stay poor.

the wealthy stay wealthy.







Maybe to understand why and how men become presidents you have to understand their qualities and which qualities are shared by each. Wealth obviously makes it easier to move with the inner circles of our "presidential aristocracy", but it can also foster a greater drive for success than what the middle class produces. Trying to keep up or surpass dad who is an oil tycoon and president is a little harder than if your dad was a mechanic. Being wealthy also gains your entrance into Ivy League schools, which in essence mold students into our "ruling class", if you wish to call them this. Yale, Harvard, Princeton, etc. all are organizations which take credit for producing some of our most influential individuals. Military status aids in wooing the general public also, not to mention it trains the individual in discipline and drive.

this quote pretty much supports my thoery :coffee:






There are too many variables that counter the simple argument that "bloodline" is the reason for our presidential elect.

so then if you cant prove it wrong... what the hell are you blathering about :rolleyes:


BO-DEN
 
Last edited:
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:
LOL!And your solution is?

You seemed to be defending the selection process of these eliteist incumants,hence my above statements.It's a joke.

The selection process is by the people. I know many of you wish to lay blame on the parties, some elitist background of the candidates, or the cost of campaigning, but who is really forcing the public to choose between the two parties? Who is making people "like" Bush, or "like" Kerry? Why ARE people selecting these candidates as "worthy" of their vote? Individual choice. The public is choosing their candidate based on numerous factors; some valid, some ignorant.

This is not Iraq, where you vote for Saddam or die. We voluntarily elect idiots.
 
atlantabiolab said:
The selection process is by the people. I know many of you wish to lay blame on the parties, some elitist background of the candidates, or the cost of campaigning, but who is really forcing the public to choose between the two parties? Who is making people "like" Bush, or "like" Kerry? Why ARE people selecting these candidates as "worthy" of their vote? Individual choice. The public is choosing their candidate based on numerous factors; some valid, some ignorant.

This is not Iraq, where you vote for Saddam or die. We voluntarily elect idiots.

the people pic what media tells them too... and who controls media?

lol its right in front of your face man


BO-DEN
 
SUPERDIMI said:
Sorry bro, but I just don't buy all that "behold a pale horse"-type stuff. I had a friend who was a mason and some of the stuff he told me was outright ridiculous. The whole idea he had and the rest of his lodge was everyone else was "the mentally dead" and our lodge and the rest of the masons know the real truth. There is definitely truth to there being hippocracy and "behind the scenes politics" going on in this world and especially the U.S. But, to the extreme that some of these conspiracy theories make it out to be? No way.

I doubt that John Kerry and George Bush are cousins. And what is that anyway, back in the 1500's we had a common relative so that makes us cousins? Huh?

every president we have ever had was a mason..
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/US_Presidents/US_Presidents03.htm

so i wonder if they have the same "mentally brain dead" opinon about you and me?



I BET SO :)

BO-DEN
 
Last edited:
atlantabiolab said:
The selection process is by the people. I know many of you wish to lay blame on the parties, some elitist background of the candidates, or the cost of campaigning, but who is really forcing the public to choose between the two parties? Who is making people "like" Bush, or "like" Kerry? Why ARE people selecting these candidates as "worthy" of their vote? Individual choice. The public is choosing their candidate based on numerous factors; some valid, some ignorant.

This is not Iraq, where you vote for Saddam or die. We voluntarily elect idiots.

That is so laughable that even YOU have to admit it.BY THE PEOPLE?Which people?Do you honestly believe that the average white collar,tax-paying american has a say so in the actual representitive candidate?All we have is a limited list of Eliteists who have the biggest campaign funds to get their faces shown on TV.We may not die if we don't vote for scum,but when all you have is special interest-A and special interest-B,and no alternative choice,well you get the picture.
 
HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex said:
That is so laughable that even YOU have to admit it.BY THE PEOPLE?Which people?Do you honestly believe that the average white collar,tax-paying american has a say so in the actual representitive candidate?All we have is a limited list of Eliteists who have the biggest campaign funds to get their faces shown on TV.We may not die if we don't vote for scum,but when all you have is special interest-A and special interest-B,and no alternative choice,well you get the picture.

WELL SAID HUCK :lightning

this is sooo obviouse... its sooo clear... whats laughable is that an educated person could be so clueless.


:fryhim:
 
Top Bottom