jboldman said:Could one of you help me out here and explain how estrogen causes lipogenesis as opposed to regional deposition? Remember, EVEN IF excess estro causes lipogenesis(which remains to be proven) if you are not on exo test where would the excess estro come from?
jb
then whoever is measuring your bodyfat is doing it wrong if water is accounting for BF.OKIE said:Thanks to all...I guess I should have made my question clearer. I realize that an anti-e will not actually decrease bf, but if I'm holding water, then my bf test usually shows a higher % of bf. My thinking was that I could take an anti-e which would reduce the water retention thus making my bf% seem lower when I'm tested with the calipers. I've taken a-dex before while on cyle. Anyone got a favorite for cutting while off cycle? Thanks again for the help...great responses.
stonecold54 said:then whoever is measuring your bodyfat is doing it wrong if water is accounting for BF.
pharmguy said:I have noticed they(anti aromatase anyways) help a good bit, but I think it is a nasty way to go about losing fat. I am beginning to see more and more how anti-e's are taken too lightly around the bb'ding world. These are powerful drugs with terrible long term side effects. Calcium depletion is a terrible thing especialy for a bodybuilder. Not to mention further damage to lipid profile and more hair loss. Nolva will not deplete calcium, but I don't know how effective at fat burning it is.Stick with yohimbine, var, ALA, green tea, CKD or low carb diet, cardio.
PG
Interesting topic. so does anyone actually take anti-e's off-cycle?
BigAndy69 said:
I've read that excessive fat can raise estrogen levels. That's why you see so many fat guys with gyno (You know, Fat guys with B cups.)
Mike P.T. said:
That's true. The more and bigger fat cells you have the more estrogen produced. Fat cells are like estrogen factories since alot of the aromatization process occurs there. Having said that taking anti-e's will most definately help you to shed bodyfat. They will help to keep estrogen related side effects lower like increased potential for fat accumulation and well as making it harder overall to lose fat weight already had. Taking an anti-e will help to keep natural test levels and dht at a higher level since less in converted into estrogen. That tips the scale if favor of a higher androgenic enviroment with less estrogen which means better fat burning.![]()
oubeta said:OKIE
My buddie wants to do a show. I told him you would help him get in tough with someone.
Drugs are taken too lightly around here. Use only what you need, and for what you can not do naturally.pharmguy said:I have noticed they(anti aromatase anyways) help a good bit, but I think it is a nasty way to go about losing fat. I am beginning to see more and more how anti-e's are taken too lightly around the bb'ding world. These are powerful drugs with terrible long term side effects. Calcium depletion is a terrible thing especialy for a bodybuilder. Not to mention further damage to lipid profile and more hair loss. Nolva will not deplete calcium, but I don't know how effective at fat burning it is.Stick with yohimbine, var, ALA, green tea, CKD or low carb diet, cardio.
PG
genarr3 said:
Drugs are taken too lightly around here. Use only what you need, and for what you can not do naturally.
DeepZenPill said:
Taking this into consideration, 90% of people here should stop using AAS (myself included). I guess that's partially why I'm taking a long time off from using, but very few people really exhaust all their natural means to make gains before using AAS. Many people are completely aware that they're taking a shortcut, but that's because they're all about getting their goal in the shortest time possible. I can't blame them.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










