1_more_rep
New member
ok this is getting REALLY
i'm in my honors government (took it because i wanted an easy A so i decided to take honors rather than AP) class and it's only been the second week...
the first day of class we were to turn in our summer projects. the same day he talked about how america's government was the greatest out there and dictatorships had NOTHING good about them. So i raised my hand and POLITELY said he should not be biased and teach these students that know nothing about gov. right away that dictatorships are ALL bad. so he got pissed and talked to me outside for a min. and said i could not call him biased and it's only day ONE and i don't even know him so i said sorry and sat down. (probably the reason for the following) anyways, I worked really hard on it with a friend and my paper was SOOOO well written/informative/strong and good points brought up on parts where he asked for our opinion.
anyways i expected a 100 on it no problem (not out of wholehearted cockiness but because i am smarter than literally everyone in the class because most of the students at my level chose to take AP).
so i get my paper back and i got an 89...
and the dumbass wrote 0 comments as to WHY i got an 89 and not higher.
so later that night i ask my friend who i worked on the project with (the guy who is not as smart as me and his paper had fewer facts, weak opinion, etc.) and he got a 98.
i then ask a cheerleader friend of mine who had been up at like 4 AM the first day of school rushing it and finishing it (she did not read either book pertaining to the project) and she wrote 3 pages. HE SAID ON THE PAPER MINIMUM OF 6 PAGES now it's ok if my other friend got a high A because he is pretty smart. But this girl is an ALL C or D student and cannot write at ALL. her average few sentences in the paper is "presidents work hard on campaigns. They work alot and go around to get voters. It is expensive to get voters but they have to work hard to get them."
she's cool and all but did NOT deserve a point over a 70 on the project. She gets a 96.
i thought perhaps maybe i overestimated my skills and i did not write as well as i could of. But i read both of these people's projects and compared them to mine. Mine had superior vocabulary, more info, more everything that a teacher could want. anyways i ignored this and said oh well ill just ace every test/quiz and do all the HW and keep a high A in the class it's no problem.
we take our first test. The guy is a horrible liar. Says it will cover the TYPES of government (republic, monarchy, dictatorship, etc.) and stuff like john locke's theories. The guy puts like 2 questions on what a democracy is and the REMAINDER of the test is on IRAQ. Keep in mind my cheer friend knows absolutely NOTHING about iraq. He said to assess iraq and give your OPINION on the bush doctrine, etc. My friend did not even know the bush doctrine n she wrote about 2 sentences saying oh we should not be at war. And i go into great detail about the threat of nuclear warfare with other nations, the extension of big stick diplomacy bush is trying to show, etc. (he said this was opinion so he CANT take off points for it being my opinion).
on test about 4 dumb kids i know all got low 90's - 92, 93, 90, 95
i get an 87.....and this time i am POSITIVE i am being treated unfairly because i wrote so many strong responses to his essay Qs and no one else even knew what the qs were ABOUT.
what would you guys do in this situation? talking to him probably won't work since he already doesn't like me. and i keep producing superior work and getting lower than fair grades.
this is VERY
and my teacher is a prick.
i'm in my honors government (took it because i wanted an easy A so i decided to take honors rather than AP) class and it's only been the second week...
the first day of class we were to turn in our summer projects. the same day he talked about how america's government was the greatest out there and dictatorships had NOTHING good about them. So i raised my hand and POLITELY said he should not be biased and teach these students that know nothing about gov. right away that dictatorships are ALL bad. so he got pissed and talked to me outside for a min. and said i could not call him biased and it's only day ONE and i don't even know him so i said sorry and sat down. (probably the reason for the following) anyways, I worked really hard on it with a friend and my paper was SOOOO well written/informative/strong and good points brought up on parts where he asked for our opinion.
anyways i expected a 100 on it no problem (not out of wholehearted cockiness but because i am smarter than literally everyone in the class because most of the students at my level chose to take AP).
so i get my paper back and i got an 89...
and the dumbass wrote 0 comments as to WHY i got an 89 and not higher.
so later that night i ask my friend who i worked on the project with (the guy who is not as smart as me and his paper had fewer facts, weak opinion, etc.) and he got a 98.
i then ask a cheerleader friend of mine who had been up at like 4 AM the first day of school rushing it and finishing it (she did not read either book pertaining to the project) and she wrote 3 pages. HE SAID ON THE PAPER MINIMUM OF 6 PAGES now it's ok if my other friend got a high A because he is pretty smart. But this girl is an ALL C or D student and cannot write at ALL. her average few sentences in the paper is "presidents work hard on campaigns. They work alot and go around to get voters. It is expensive to get voters but they have to work hard to get them."
she's cool and all but did NOT deserve a point over a 70 on the project. She gets a 96.
i thought perhaps maybe i overestimated my skills and i did not write as well as i could of. But i read both of these people's projects and compared them to mine. Mine had superior vocabulary, more info, more everything that a teacher could want. anyways i ignored this and said oh well ill just ace every test/quiz and do all the HW and keep a high A in the class it's no problem.
we take our first test. The guy is a horrible liar. Says it will cover the TYPES of government (republic, monarchy, dictatorship, etc.) and stuff like john locke's theories. The guy puts like 2 questions on what a democracy is and the REMAINDER of the test is on IRAQ. Keep in mind my cheer friend knows absolutely NOTHING about iraq. He said to assess iraq and give your OPINION on the bush doctrine, etc. My friend did not even know the bush doctrine n she wrote about 2 sentences saying oh we should not be at war. And i go into great detail about the threat of nuclear warfare with other nations, the extension of big stick diplomacy bush is trying to show, etc. (he said this was opinion so he CANT take off points for it being my opinion).
on test about 4 dumb kids i know all got low 90's - 92, 93, 90, 95
i get an 87.....and this time i am POSITIVE i am being treated unfairly because i wrote so many strong responses to his essay Qs and no one else even knew what the qs were ABOUT.
what would you guys do in this situation? talking to him probably won't work since he already doesn't like me. and i keep producing superior work and getting lower than fair grades.
and my teacher is a prick.

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 

















