How did Noah fit all the animals into the ark? Serious question...

[Big Brother Val]

so cry me a river, what do you want me to say? this is what the bible says. go tell your story to the rest of the millions

I guess that's where my question lies, Triple B. How can the theory of evolution and stuff be so far fetched, yet the idea of Noah's ark be absolutely accepted?

Can you imagine someone today trying build a giant boat, and have him tell everyone he was going to take two animals of every kind on it?

Even if he had millions of dollars backing him up, do you actually think he could pull it off? Of course not.

I'm just trying to understand how one theory can be absolutely denounced by someone because it's too hard to believe.

Granted... the fact that we came from shit swimming in the ocean is hard to fathom... but someone living to be 900 years old, to do what Noah did is OKAY?

You yourself had mentioned the "Easter Bunny" in the other thread... what's closer to believing in the Easter Bunny... evolution... or a 900 year old man doing what Noah did?

And if animals didn't eat eachother on the ark, because it was before carnivores were around? Didn't man eat animals back then? That's a carnivore. And dinosaurs did too.

Now, I'm not trying to discredit you, understand. Or insult you by any means. These are just answers to questions that even the most religious people I've talked to don't know the answer to, and they tell me they just have to have faith.

So if the THEORIES in the bible are just accepted, no matter how far-fetched they are... why is the THEORY of evolution so hard to accept?

 

[Mad4Iron]

so cry me a river, what do you want me to say? this is what the bible says. go tell your story to the rest of the millions

No my friend,I aint crying and I'm talking to this forum,You came on to it as you have a right.

Tell me what you think,You've read the Bible,I know what it says,but I want to know what You think as you've interjected your opinion.

Many generations came and went before the Bible was set to paper.

Ever tell a joke to a friend and hear it 3 weeks later from another friend? aint the same joke eh? Imagine 20 or 30 generations,kinda fuck up the story line.

Mad

 

[big_bad_buff]

I guess that's where my question lies, Triple B. How can the theory of evolution and stuff be so far fetched, yet the idea of Noah's ark be absolutely accepted?

this is my point. it takes faith to believe either or. correct? i was not saying creation is better than evolution. i was saying i wouldn't believe evolution at all, no matter what. it had nothing to do with creation. anyways i'm out, be on later tonight when i get back. stay broly you cock sucks

 

[Jimsbbc]

Read that link i posted on Noah's Ark. It is a long read but scientifically proves that the formation on Mt. Ararat is a boat with a keel, bulkheads evenly spaced throughout, and ballast in the hull. It also fits Noah's Arks dimensions perfectly, based on the Royal Egyptian Cubit, not the Hebrew Cubit which was not in existance at that time.

This Archealogist also proved Moses led Israel out of Egypt into the Land of Midian which is Saudi Arabia, not the Sinai peninsula. The real Mt. Sinai lies in NW Saudi Arabia, and the crossing took place across the Gulf of Aqaba. There is a natural land bridge only a few feet underwater that links the two land masses (which they crossed). The Real Mt. Sinai lies in Saudi Arabia is surrounded razor wire fence and by Saudi guards and military out in the middle of BFE to keep this from being found out. There has been a documentary done by two Americans who sneaked in wearing night vision equipment and video'd the evidence. I have the video. It shows the mountain that is chared black from fire, a 8 foot tall altar, counts of non-indigenous cattle, the rock 7 stories high Moses split which water gushed from - worn smooth in an arid land that gets 1 1/2" of rain a year. You will never see that in left anti Christian anti jewish media though.

Soon enough this will catch main stream media. The thing is people will try to find anything wrong with it they can and refute it so they do not have to believe and can live in complete selfishness.

 

[XBiker]

this is my point. it takes faith to believe either or. correct? i was not saying creation is better than evolution. i was saying i wouldn't believe evolution at all, no matter what. it had nothing to do with creation. anyways i'm out, be on later tonight when i get back. stay broly you cock sucks

Darwin has already proved evolution, bro.

You should read my post earlier. 0 or 1, no .5

You have faith, BBV is questioning the fabric of this faith. Is the bible a 100% accurate and accountable text? No.

In the day and age of testing everything to see if it's legit, the concept of god himself brings scruitiny.

When I live here and especially when I move on, I hope to achieve what this person did.

 

[BigBazooka]

I think you guys should have a debate about Santa Claus and how in the hell does he provide Christmas presents to billions of people.

 

[Burning_Inside]

Guys guys...you make me sad..The lord works in mysterious ways. The bible doesn't tell EVERYTHING in detail..Some was left out because the authors thought it wouldn't need clarification, you;d just *know*. I mean no, it didn't say how Noah got all the animals and insects in but I mean you should just REALIZE that of course he had help from above in some way.



KIDDING!!! haha. I don't believe in any of that poo poo.

 

[Norman Bates]

What probably happened is that some big flood happened in the Euphrat/Tigris region. Some farmer or fisher had a big boat and took his goats, chicks and lamas with him.

The stories in the bible are partly adopted from other religions, exaggerated , changed to fit in the agenda of the priests living back then and partly just made up.

An example is Abraham supposed to have possessed camels, yet camels were domesticated 1000 before Christ and not 3000.
There are more examples like that.
The Deuteronomion was not written by Moses but made up hundreds of years later.


Don´t take the bible literally.

 

[Imnotdutch]

The theory of evolution is just that.........a theory. You can not prove a theory to be fact........it is more a question of how certain you are that the theory is correct (of course you base this on an analysis of the evidence).

Darwin has already proved evolution, bro.

 

[Spruceman]

Noah's ark was probably a spacecraft, leaving one planet previously "seeded" by a highly intelligent species, transporting the DNA, etc of the successful species there to the earth to be incorporated into the earth's lifeforms. Perhaps the former planet either proved inhospitable, was facing one of many possible cosmic disasters, or resulted in undesirable mutations of "ideal" species. The former planet might have circled its central star in about a tenth of an earth year -- as the biblical human life span of 600+ years before the Ark became about 60 afterwards. The "Ark" could have represented repeated visitations of Earth spaced every 100,000 years or so -- with the last (the one that effected the last leap in humankind) occurring with the downfall of Neanderthal Man.

On the other hand, the ark might have been merely a sighting of Santa's sleigh on one foggy Christmas Eve or the Easter Bunny's egg basket following a first spring full moon of antiquity.