Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
PICK3
New member
cawk pics does that for me
House votes to cut $4 billion a year from food stamp
- Thread starter PICK3
- Start date
cawk pics does that for me
Lengthy, bullshit reply from some noob in 3...2...
Xaxist
New member
Taxes follow the wealth not the individual. I am not going to elaborate as this should be apparent. I want to pay less in taxes but I am willing to pay a little to help out our kids and elderly. 4 billion in tax cuts to food stamps seems a rediculous point to argue with vehemence when we paid ~1 TRILLION dollars to bail out Wall Street assholes. While I admire a self made man, I am not thanking anyone for paying their fucking taxes because I pay mine too.
Let's take point 1: top earners don't need regular law enforcement.
I am going to expand this to all public servcies such as law (including the courts), fire, disaster, FBI, military, etc. Really? Every one of us uses infrastructure and services paid for primarily by taxes. This is an absurd statement.
Point 2: top earners send their kids to private schools
They do this because they can afford to, and their kids get a much better education. Should something be done to fix our educational system? Hell yeah, but I really don't see how rich people (which most lawmakers are) not participating in an educational system they legislate is going to help 'us the people.' I don't see how that exempts them from a common goal shared by all citizens of our country.
Points 3/4: Medicaid/Medicare/SSDI/SS:
Medicaid - This is a fact, most top earners never draw Medicaid.
Medicare/SSDI/SS - unless their wages are from investments, all wages are subject to FICA. If a top earner is disabled, he generally cannot collect his private disability insurance if he does not file for SSDI so this is bullshit. I run a business and I know how this works. SS/medicare - I have never seen a rich person turn down free money they are entitled to, and this includes some well to do friends who collect SS/Medicare along with their pensions/etc. so this is bullshit too.
I want smaller government, less taxes, and everyone who can work, should work, but somehow I question some of the rationalizations I have read here or heard my own Republicans spewing. Are there no other moderates here?
Let's take point 1: top earners don't need regular law enforcement.
I am going to expand this to all public servcies such as law (including the courts), fire, disaster, FBI, military, etc. Really? Every one of us uses infrastructure and services paid for primarily by taxes. This is an absurd statement.
Point 2: top earners send their kids to private schools
They do this because they can afford to, and their kids get a much better education. Should something be done to fix our educational system? Hell yeah, but I really don't see how rich people (which most lawmakers are) not participating in an educational system they legislate is going to help 'us the people.' I don't see how that exempts them from a common goal shared by all citizens of our country.
Points 3/4: Medicaid/Medicare/SSDI/SS:
Medicaid - This is a fact, most top earners never draw Medicaid.
Medicare/SSDI/SS - unless their wages are from investments, all wages are subject to FICA. If a top earner is disabled, he generally cannot collect his private disability insurance if he does not file for SSDI so this is bullshit. I run a business and I know how this works. SS/medicare - I have never seen a rich person turn down free money they are entitled to, and this includes some well to do friends who collect SS/Medicare along with their pensions/etc. so this is bullshit too.
I want smaller government, less taxes, and everyone who can work, should work, but somehow I question some of the rationalizations I have read here or heard my own Republicans spewing. Are there no other moderates here?
Fuck yes I nailed that shit!
Xaxist
New member
STFU unless you have something intelligent to say; oh wait, that would be impossible, so proceed as usual so I can read your bullshit on practically every post in here...
Bitch you're at the wrong gotdam forum if you're looking for serious replys to anything regarding this joke of a fucking government
Give me lip again and i'll black your posts out for a fuckin month dickbreath
Give me lip again and i'll black your posts out for a fuckin month dickbreath
Only meds I'm on are prescribed by my steroid dealer
And lol @ a 50 something fuckwad using the term 'mofo'
You want change? Call a congressman you retarded piece of garbage
And lol @ a 50 something fuckwad using the term 'mofo'
You want change? Call a congressman you retarded piece of garbage
mrplunkey
New member
What you typed is completely misinformed on a number of levels. Instead of me wasting time debunking every word, I'll point-out one item.
Once a high-wealth family makes more than $44,000 in combined income, their SS benefits are taxed at 85%. I'm sure you "owns a business" and "know how this works", but apparently you also "don't know what you don't know" -- that last quote is from me.
Go visit the social security website that spells-out the 85% tax Benefits Planner: Income Taxes And Your Social Security Benefits
So no, very high wealth individuals have no interest in collecting social security. And who cares anyway? They'd get 85% of it taxed-back automatically.
And P.S. wages subject to FICA are capped at $113,700, which the average 1%'er hits around the end of the first quarter. So slow your roll on "all wages are subject to FICA" statement. Since you didn't know that, you may want to check-in with your "well to do friends" and let them educate you more on social security.
Similar threads
