Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

House passes bill to bring troops home in '08

pintoca

New member
but y'all will have to excuse me while I say your President is a douche of apocalyptic proportions... "The president said it is not Congress' job to make decisions regarding the war."

=====================

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The House of Representatives voted 223-201 Thursday to require most U.S. troops to leave Iraq by April 1, 2008.
art.bush.pelosi.gi.jpg

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, shown with President Bush in March, says the American people are demanding "a new direction."

President Bush vetoed a war-spending bill with a similar withdrawal date in May and has threatened to spike any new effort to set a timetable for a U.S. pullout. His Republican allies in the House said the new measure has no chance of passage.

But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, said Thursday's mixed report on the progress of the war shows it's time for American troops to come home.

"President Bush continues to urge patience, but what is needed -- and what the American people are demanding -- is a new direction," she said.

Earlier Thursday, Bush said a report on U.S.-set benchmarks for Iraq shows "satisfactory progress" in eight areas. He admitted that there is "more work to be done." Video Watch benchmark report, House vote factor into Iraq debate »

During his news conference, the president commented on the nation's psyche, declaring, "There's war fatigue in America. It's affecting our psychology. I understand that.

"This is an ugly war. It's a war in which an enemy will kill innocent men, women and children in order to achieve a political objective. It doesn't surprise me that there is deep concern amongst our people."

The president said it is not Congress' job to make decisions regarding the war.

Before the House vote, Rep. John Murtha, a Pennsylvania Democrat, told CNN's Wolf Blitzer: We're the people who decide when to go to war, whether the war should be funded.

"Now, when [the Bush administration] keeps making mistakes as they have made, we have to intercede. The public spoke in the last election and said clearly we want the troops redeployed."

"We are wasting the time and trying the patience of the American people for no useful purpose," said Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole, one of four Republicans who voted for the measure.

Rep. Jay Inslee, a Washington Democrat, said the United States has given Iraqi leaders "a reasonable chance" to work out their differences, and it was time for American troops to come home.

"The moral obligation to Iraq has been completed," he said. "The moral obligation to our families now needs to be honored."

Four Republicans joined 219 Democrats to pass the bill, two more than backed a similar measure in March. But 10 Democrats broke ranks to oppose it.

Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said most Republicans are unwilling to challenge Bush before a September report from Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker, the top U.S. officials in Iraq. In a closed-door meeting Wednesday, he called Republicans who break with the president "wimps."

"It was a way of illustrating the point that we ought to give the generals on the ground and our troops a chance to succeed," Boehner said.

But Rep. Jim Clyburn, the House Democratic whip, said the vote shows Republicans need to resort to "intimidation" to keep their caucus in line.

"The name-calling that other side has resorted to, I think, is beneath the dignity of the men and women who find themselves in harm's way," said Clyburn, of South Carolina.

The vote came the same day that the White House delivered a mixed report on the progress of the 4-year-old war, concluding that the political progress of the Iraqi government is lagging behind military gains. Across the Capitol, the report added new fuel to a similar debate in the Senate, where a leading Republican senator pronounced himself "disappointed" in the results.

"That government is simply not providing leadership worthy of the considerable sacrifice of our forces, and this has to change immediately," said Sen. John Warner, the influential former chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

A broader report by the top U.S. officials in Iraq -- Petraeus, the top American commander, and Crocker -- is scheduled for September, and Bush told reporters he would consult with Congress about "the way forward" at that point.

Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl, a Republican, told CNN, "I think any judgments at this time, one way or the other, are quite premature."

But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said, "The time to do this is now, not September."

"We're told, 'Good progress is being made. Wait till September. Good progress is being made.' How many times over the last 4½ years have we heard this?" Reid asked.

The Senate's Democratic leaders are using a Defense Department authorization bill as a vehicle to consider several amendments designed to force Bush to change course in the war.

Republicans have so far managed to use procedural roadblocks to head off those measures -- but faced with a U.S. death toll of more than 3,600 and deep public opposition, several GOP senators have wavered in recent weeks.

Three Republicans -- Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, Olympia Snowe of Maine and Gordon Smith of Oregon -- have co-sponsored a Democratic amendment that parallels the House bill.
advertisement

But Democrats are likely to need at least eight more Republican votes before their proposal comes to a vote.

Warner and six other Republicans voted Tuesday for an amendment that would have required U.S. troops to spend a month at home for every month deployed. Two more -- Sens. Richard Lugar and Pete Domenici -- have called on Bush to change course, but have opposed Democratic calls for an American withdrawal. E-mail to a friend
 
I like Bills like this when they are close to an election. Forces pols to shit or get off the pot. Then they have to 'splain their votes to their constituents.
 
ortiz34 said:
He'll veto it, discussion over.
Exactly. Im not one for retreat. Sorry...I have balls!

Winston Churchill once said..."Advance, advance, advance but NEVER retreat"

Fuckin cowards kill me.

gator
 
gator_mclusky said:
Exactly. Im not one for retreat. Sorry...I have balls!

Winston Churchill once said..."Advance, advance, advance but NEVER retreat"

Fuckin cowards kill me.

gator

Bush has screwed this war up and is not doing a good job of fixing it. Our mistake in Iraq is not letting the military fight the war to win. Once we decided to go in to Iraq then we should have gone in with every weapon in our arsenal; the hell with collateral damage. That's how we covered EU's butt in WWII and how we won. Police action and the establishment of goverments is not the job of the military. Defending our country and our way of life is. They declared war on us. Even in the US, polls of muslims say they support killing US soldiers and innocents for their retarded backward faith. My attitude is kill one American, we kill 10 of you. Do it again and we kill 100. Next time, we wipe you off the face of the earth. America and our way of life is worth fighting and dying for. We should stop allowing muslims to visit or emigrate to the US (along with the Mexicans etc... I won't even start on that one), round up the non-citizen muslims and kick them out, keep a close eye on the others then lock them up when they cross the line. The message is "we're mad as hell and we're not gonna take it anymore". I had friends killed in 9/11. I don't look at any muslim the same way anymore. I don't like them and I don't trust them.

All the EU folks and pacifists can flame me now.
 
while i do think the cause in iraq is almost a lost one, i find humor that a euro bro is posting this.
they just can't get off our nuts, saying they hate us with one side of their mouth while licking our asses with the other.
 
So much Bush bashing.. Look who the alternative was.. A man that called the troops idiots.. I'd much rather follow a guy that supports the troops rather than bashing them.
 
Gambino said:
while i do think the cause in iraq is almost a lost one, i find humor that a euro bro is posting this.
they just can't get off our nuts, saying they hate us with one side of their mouth while licking our asses with the other.



....
 
the_clockwork said:
So much Bush bashing.. Look who the alternative was.. A man that called the troops idiots.. I'd much rather follow a guy that supports the troops rather than bashing them.
it's funny to me that people across the globe are soo interested in him.
they go thru the effort to know about him when we could give a fuck about who their leader is and what he stands for.
 
Top Bottom