Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Hey HR.....

PM's?
 
caligirl said:
and how would you know the difference?
It's called conversation and qualifying. Some guys fit the stereotype of being controlled by their penis and some of us don't. You have to be more than pretty to be with me.
 
javaguru said:
It's called conversation and qualifying. Some guys fit the stereotype of being controlled by their penis and some of us don't. You have to be more than pretty to be with me.


lololololoollololo! I suppose I should have asked " how would you know, to know the difference?
I suppose you would of had to sleep with some dumbass chics to come to your conclusion... so by your statement... you're an equal opportunity dater.


" you have to be more than pretty to be with me" yeah right... you'd take whatever comes
 
caligirl said:
lololololoollololo! I suppose I should have asked " how would you know, to know the difference?
I suppose you would of had to sleep with some dumbass chics to come to your conclusion... so by your statement... you're an equal opportunity dater.


" you have to be more than pretty to be with me" yeah right... you'd take whatever comes
I was a manwhore in my college days....hit more than a few models. I admit that freely...I prefer the creativity, conversation and intelligence of the smart girls. A lack of intelligence is a "deal killer" for me.
 
javaguru said:
I was a manwhore in my college days....hit more than a few models. I admit that freely...I prefer the creativity, conversation and intelligence of the smart girls. A lack of intelligence is a "deal killer" for me.

so you're saying models are not smart? pretty/beautiful woman are intelektchually challanged ??? hmmmm.

sounds like you've been burnt by what you thought to of been a beautiful woman at one time, and now you choose to "settle" for a not so pretty girl, which you call "smart" which lowers your own perceived chances of rejection... no?
 
caligirl said:
so you're saying models are not smart? pretty/beautiful woman are intelektchually challanged ??? hmmmm.

sounds like you've been burnt by what you thought to of been a beautiful woman at one time, and now you choose to "settle" for a not so pretty girl, which you call "smart" which lowers your own perceived chances of rejection... no?
I'm single, I haven't "settled" with anything and your post doesn't improve the "model" position in regard to intelligence......
 
javaguru said:
your post doesn't improve the "model" position in regard to intelligence......

wow, that's a serious generalization.
you could be missing out on a smart AND beautiful woman. I suppose
intelligent homely girls need love too, thank goodness there's java.
 
caligirl said:
so you're saying models are not smart? pretty/beautiful woman are intelektchually challanged ??? hmmmm.

sounds like you've been burnt by what you thought to of been a beautiful woman at one time, and now you choose to "settle" for a not so pretty girl, which you call "smart" which lowers your own perceived chances of rejection... no?
stop talking.show pink eye...........next
 
caligirl said:
wow, that's a serious generalization.
you could be missing out on a smart AND beautiful woman. I suppose
intelligent homely girls need love too, thank goodness there's java.
I'll take a 7 with a brain over the typical 9+ any day of the week.
 
javaguru said:
I'll take a 7 with a brain over the typical 9+ any day of the week.


if a woman is a 9+ I believe she would be far from "typical"

lololoolololol

damn dood.. you and women...:rolleyes:
 
caligirl said:
so you're saying models are not smart? pretty/beautiful woman are intelektchually challanged ??? hmmmm.

sounds like you've been burnt by what you thought to of been a beautiful woman at one time, and now you choose to "settle" for a not so pretty girl, which you call "smart" which lowers your own perceived chances of rejection... no?
This needs another quote.
 
caligirl said:
so you're saying models are not smart? pretty/beautiful woman are intelektchually challanged ??? hmmmm.

sounds like you've been burnt by what you thought to of been a beautiful woman at one time, and now you choose to "settle" for a not so pretty girl, which you call "smart" which lowers your own perceived chances of rejection... no?
You aren't making a good case for models.....
 
OK, we'll settle the model's are dumb or not. I know a lot about history and biochem while Caligirl knows a lot about makeup and looking pretty. My proposition, we debate Hawking's theories on astrophysics and Samoth will moderate, it's neutral ground.
 
javaguru said:
OK, we'll settle the model's are dumb or not. I know a lot about history and biochem while Caligirl knows a lot about makeup and looking pretty. My proposition, we debate Hawking's theories on astrophysics and Samoth will moderate, it's neutral ground.

She's waaayyyyyy hotter then you. All she has to do is smile and u lose
 
javaguru said:
SPIKE TV told me that smart girls are better in bed...I concur... :)
java, intelligent women ARE better in bed, no doubt. dim witted women, no matter how hot, are terrible lays.

furthermore, smart people are more fun, creative etc...
 
Every med, pys, or bio girl that I ever slept with in college seemed to be self-conscious about her body and adventurous sex. Never felt any excitement or energy for some reason.
 
layinback said:
java, intelligent women ARE better in bed, no doubt. dim witted women, no matter how hot, are terrible lays.

furthermore, smart people are more fun, creative etc...
Heaven for the climate and hell for the company.... :)
 
they are all sluts
 
layinback said:
java, intelligent women ARE better in bed, no doubt. dim witted women, no matter how hot, are terrible lays.

furthermore, smart people are more fun, creative etc...


Right....we have to plot it out....then give you the best fuck you ever had. :heart:
 
javaguru said:
SPIKE TV told me that smart girls are better in bed...I concur... :)
Is this thread to say that I'm ugly or that I'm stupid? I'm too lazy to read the whole thing...lol.
 
caligirl said:
wow, that's a serious generalization.
you could be missing out on a smart AND beautiful woman. I suppose
intelligent homely girls need love too, thank goodness there's java.
Gee, thanks. I love being called homely. I sure wouldn't want him to "settle" for someone like me when he could have someone so nice as you...lol.
 
heatherrae said:
Is this thread to say that I'm ugly or that I'm stupid? I'm too lazy to read the whole thing...lol.
It was a thread to stir up EF...putting you in the title made it more likely to go several pages. Oh,I think you're a smart chick just emotionalrae sometimes. :)
 
javaguru said:
It was a thread to stir up EF...putting you in the title made it more likely to go several pages. Oh,I think you're a smart chick just emotionalrae sometimes. :)
you love that side of me. it builds sexual tension deep in your man loins.
 
javaguru said:
It was a thread to stir up EF...putting you in the title made it more likely to go several pages. Oh,I think you're a smart chick just emotionalrae sometimes. :)
oh shit. i just realized this means it was a "u r ugly" thread. :worried:
 
heatherrae said:
oh shit. i just realized this means it was a "u r ugly" thread. :worried:
Actually, it was hijacked in that direction but I think the thread turned out splendidly. "Are you ugly" threads are entitled, "Would you hit it."
 
javaguru said:
Actually, it was hijacked in that direction but I think the thread turned out splendidly. "Are you ugly" threads are entitled, "Would you hit it."
:lmao: I'm not sure what to make of someone being offended like you are calling them bad in bed because you said smart girls are better...LOL. That made me chuckle a little bit.

BTW
Well, would you hit it? :qt:


lol...j/k
 
heatherrae said:
:lmao: I'm not sure what to make of someone being offended like you are calling them bad in bed because you said smart girls are better...LOL. That made me chuckle a little bit.

BTW
Well, would you hit it? :qt:


lol...j/k
I can only determine that if you post nudes....
 
javaguru said:
I can only determine that if you post nudes....
ohhhhh, you wanna see my c-section scar and my linea negra? That's hawt. :lmao:
 
javaguru said:
I'm sure one of the EF borly's would rub one out to your c-section.

You called?

491n3b4.jpg
 
sometimes dumbness if fun in a partner.
you don't feel as bad about degrading them, as ugly as that sounds its realness
 
Moltke said:
sometimes dumbness if fun in a partner.
you don't feel as bad about degrading them, as ugly as that sounds its realness
lololololololol

when i was younger, yes. ( i was a lil sadistic and screwing a stupid bitch then demean them, i have PAID for it though )
 
layinback said:
lololololololol

when i was younger, yes. ( i was a lil sadistic and screwing a stupid bitch then demean them, i have PAID for it though )
Gambino is a young borly.....finding and making something that lasts is the trick....and a hell of a lot harder than "hooking up."
 
javaguru said:
Gambino is a young borly.....finding and making something that lasts is the trick....and a hell of a lot harder than "hooking up."


you must spread some karma around before giving it to
javaguru again. :)
 
javaguru said:
My money...Marlin Brando...VERY good looking borly back in his day and not in a pick3 way...
brando was otherworldly handsome and a genius too! pacino and De Niro admittedly "borrowed" from him and rightfully do not consider themselves in his league.
 
layinback said:
brando was otherworldly handsome and a genius too! pacino and De Niro admittedly "borrowed" from him and rightfully do not consider themselves in his league.
"The Young Lions" was the movie when I recognized his acting brilliance. Before that It was "Apocalypse Now."
 
javaguru said:
"The Young Lions" was the movie when I recognized his acting brilliance. Before that It was "Apocalypse Now."
both are veeery good performances but checkout " on the waterfront"
 
layinback said:
both are veeery good performances but checkout " on the waterfront"
"The Horror." One of the best lines ever...I haven't seen it and I should rent it. I found it amazing he was capable of playing those roles, a truly great actor.
 
jackangel said:
he played a mean fletcher christian

i don't mean mean, but well, whatever.
hell yeah, mutiny on the bounty. almost forgot about that one and he played a pretty good godfather too lol.
 
layinback said:
brando was otherworldly handsome and a genius too! pacino and De Niro admittedly "borrowed" from him and rightfully do not consider themselves in his league.

John Cleese borrowed from Cary Grant (see Arsenic and Old Lace if you doubt it, and Cleese' Archibald Leach in Fish called Wanda) and Alan Alda HEAVILY borrowed from Bugs Bunny. :artist:
 
layinback said:
brando was otherworldly handsome and a genius too! pacino and De Niro admittedly "borrowed" from him and rightfully do not consider themselves in his league.

burt reynolds made a career of miming his expressions with his lookalike face.
 
javaguru said:
I was a manwhore in my college days....hit more than a few models. I admit that freely...I prefer the creativity, conversation and intelligence of the smart girls. A lack of intelligence is a "deal killer" for me.

Honestly it is for me too...I cant stand to even talk to these empty headed Paris Hilton "that's hot" knock offs.

Plus having to explain everything in life to a grown woman like she is a child gets real old real fast.
 
Top Bottom