GTP 500mg EQ

[satchboogie]

INDY..

you have it wrong this time bro.
read what he wrote a few times..

 

[Retabolil2]

Why is it you only pop out of the dark in Satch's post ?? I think you'll find folks wont respect that very much, besides it just plain looks creepy. Post some good......not just evil.

Read what I`ve posted, nothing bad about satch or GTP. One year ago BD bold was tested 30% under due to problems with raw material.

 

[BBBBig Phenom]

Listen I will take it for 14weeks and let you all know how good my gains are and how vacular I look.......I have talked to many people that say this is top notch

 

[satchboogie]

Read what I`ve posted, nothing bad about satch or GTP. One year ago BD bold was tested 30% under due to problems with raw material.

yes indeed..
UG labs are at the mercy of powder suppliers.
and when theres a problem with raw materials, the lab results get fucked up and the souce/UG lab earn a 'bad' reputation..

the source(s) has nothing to do with this...
and in most cases the UG lab is not at fault either..
just part of the game.

 

[Ulter]

I don't think the labs can write off the quality of their product to the Chinese. I don't do that with any lab. When we buy material we test it BEFORE it goes into the product. If it's no good we send it back and go somewhere else. Unfortunately for the consumers who buy products made by our competitors, we seem to be all alone in that practice.

The lab "PROBABLY" tested for Nandrolone because of the poor handwriting on the lab order.

 

[BBBBig Phenom]

VERY knowledgeable people here.

 

[Indy]

INDY..

you have it wrong this time bro.
read what he wrote a few times..

No I dont think so, last few threads were negative, I got out, haven't saw him in a thread since unless it's questioning credibility of someone or something that's "not his" I just think it's creepy it's the only threads he's in now..

and yes Ret, maybe not this thread but you and I spoke a few weeks ago, it was UGLY and you were the root of it. Come on guys, cant we just all get along, words stolen from a very famous crook

 

[BigAndy69]

yes indeed..
UG labs are at the mercy of powder suppliers.
and when theres a problem with raw materials, the lab results get fucked up and the souce/UG lab earn a 'bad' reputation..

the source(s) has nothing to do with this...
and in most cases the UG lab is not at fault either..
just part of the game.

I think it really is the responsibillity of the UG label to test some of the powders they are about to use in there products. The raw supplier is not to be held accountable by the consumers of UG gear; the producer is responsible.

UG labels should always test the following products before production

Boldenone
Trenbolone

I've seen Trenbolone powder that tests at 99% and some other stuff that barely made the high 80%.

Tabs from UG producers are usually more accurately dosed since tabs are made in very large batches so they usually take the time to test out the powder before starting production. Imagine running production of 100,000 dbol tabs to later find out that it's only 70% pure. Not good, tens of thousands of dollars are at risk. (Capsules aren't made in large volume.)

Oils can be made in smaller amounts, that's why UG producers generally don't test the powders. Trenbolone and Boldenone should ALWAYS be tested.

 

[satchboogie]

BIGANDY..
good points that i agree on.

surely the source should ALWAYS be accountable should customers have problems with underdosed gear...

but we must remember that the source puts his trust in the UG lab he represents...
and the UG lab puts their trust in the powder source.

the bottom line is customer satisfaction.. pure and simple.

 

[berkley]

BIGANDY..

but we must remember that the source puts his trust in the UG lab he represents...
and the UG lab puts their trust in the powder source.

At each level materials SHOULD BE tested. Like Ulter said, UG source should verify the powder they are purchasing. NO such thing as trust in black market business...PERIOD.