GH users !!!!

[M.O.D]

hi zap.

i think gh would be a big advantage to him. i fought with knee and shoulder joint pain for years which i think had a lot to to with my use of roids at an early age and growing too fast...but since i started using gh i dont feel very little to sometimes no pain at all in my joints...prior to this i had hard time doing shoulder presses.

 

[heavy only]

i would still be doing two shots a day... i would do my shoulders one day and the bi's the next day and just keep rotating.

Man, if you really want to know if it helps localized growth here's your chance. Just shoot your left bi and shoulder continuosly

 

[M.O.D]

well did my first shot of the day in my bi which was smooth as silk...

now if i were a drug co. like serono and of course sales means everything how would i want the user to admin this drug..

SQ= easy for the patient to do everyday with a slin pin.
IM= patients most likely would be advised to go into the glute using a much large pin which would make for many people not wanting to use this drug on a regular basis...

not saying the above is the reason why they suggest SQ but it sure would make sense on sales of the drug

 

[bbkingpin]

TO M.O.D.

I saw on one of the GH manufacturer's websites (on a bar graph) that SQ results in a moderately higher blood level of GH than IM. The length of elevation was the same but the amount was greater for SQ. This seems to imply greater absorption for SQ. Is it possible you are administering in a bad location? One GH manuf site showed the model pinch the skin and pull from the thigh and then inject underneath the skin. Where do you have low body fat? This way you could get UNDER the skin and avoid the areas of your body with thinker skin because of body fat. But IM is still supposed to be effective. Just SQ is preferred (I would assume based on tests as represented on the website I just spoke of.)

 

[bbkingpin]

To M.O.D.

SPELL CHECK: thinker skin=thicker skin

 

[bigal]

MOD,let us know your results, I always like to hear the real world experience. If you like IM, I might try it that way and couldn't you do IM with a slin pin. I'm fairly thin-skinned anyway

 

[XXXL]

hey MOD, this is a little off topic. . but. . . what does your injection schedule look like as far as your gh injections go? do you do them every 12 hours (one post workout and one before bed) or do you inject on a different schedule?

and will you keep up with the same schedule as SQ injections as with IM?

 

[M.O.D]

hey MOD, this is a little off topic. . but. . . what does your injection schedule look like as far as your gh injections go? do you do them every 12 hours (one post workout and one before bed) or do you inject on a different schedule?

and will you keep up with the same schedule as SQ injections as with IM?

i take my first 2iu's around 8am and another 2iu's around 4pm post workout

 

[M.O.D]

Re: TO M.O.D.

I saw on one of the GH manufacturer's websites (on a bar graph) that SQ results in a moderately higher blood level of GH than IM. The length of elevation was the same but the amount was greater for SQ. This seems to imply greater absorption for SQ. Is it possible you are administering in a bad location? One GH manuf site showed the model pinch the skin and pull from the thigh and then inject underneath the skin. Where do you have low body fat? This way you could get UNDER the skin and avoid the areas of your body with thinker skin because of body fat. But IM is still supposed to be effective. Just SQ is preferred (I would assume based on tests as represented on the website I just spoke of.)

dont get me wrong i great results from my use of GH...maybe the IM is a bad idea...like the saying goes "if it aint broke dont fix it"

 

[ironmaster]

Hey, MOD, glad to see you survived. Two reasons why SQ is the preferred method for most. As BBK pointed out, studies show better absorption and longer activity for SQ over IM, and perhaps more importantly, the studies show tissue atrophy at the injection site when using IM. Muscle tissue ATROPHY!!! Not what I want in my bi's or delts, thats for sure. So pick your spots carefully, and rotate like crazy. The atrophy part is why localized fat reduction is noticed with SQ in trouble areas.
But as you know, GH works quite differently from one individual to another. It's results are awesome for senior citizens like me, any way I inject it. I'm aware of the variant theories of injection times and quantities, ala Cutler......I only report what works for me. My waist line is much tighter from localized SQ injections. Same thing, lawn, that's what works for me.....you may be different. And I don't think you are using enough, anyway, but I know money don't grow on trees either.
The benefits to the joints, the state of mind, the ability to stay lean while eating big........it's the shit, esp. if you are over 40. Healing time is quicker, also, MOD, so see you in the gym before too long, bro.