one man gang
New member
Just wanted to get some feedback on this one folks, as I decided that with the traditional "volume" approach that I have always used I might be overtraining some of the smaller muscle groups (bi's, tri's, shoulders), so I've been trying the 10x10 approach with short rest intervals (30--45 seconds max between sets) and limiting my workouts from start to finish to one hour, before the cortisol starts to kick in. I actually like this approach, as keeping the workouts down to under allows me to keep my "focus" during the entire workout. What I have noticed, however, is that I can get a lot more done using the 10x10 approach (20 sets per bodypart is a cinch with the short rest periods) so actually while I'm working out less as far as total time in concerned, I'm doing a hell of a lot more total sets per bodypart. Which leads me to my question, which of the two factors (total time working out/total amount of sets done per workout) is what really leads to overtraining??????????????????????? If you believe the cortisol kicking in at the hour mark arguement, total time would seem to be the answer, but being able to 20 total sets for bi's, for example, even if I can get them in under an hour, seems to be a hell of a lot of work, even if it does go by fast. Looking foward to hear your opinions, O.M.G.