Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Genetic Limit Discussion....Madcow

Illuminati

New member
Madcow,

Do you really believe that there is such a thing as "genetic limit?" I've never fully bought into this theory. Maybe there is some sort of "genetic limit" when it comes to size, but I dont believe that there is such a thing when it comes to strength. I think it has more to do with training, desire and determination.
Let me use the all famous bench press. The average Joe Schmo can't bench press over 315. Once they reach that limit, and get stuck there for a while, they might tend to think that they have reached their "genetic limit" because they can't get any stronger, but it is merely a excuse. Joe Schmo probably doesn't have the right training program that would push him to bench press over 315. Joe Schmo becomes content to think that he is at his "Genetic Limit," until one day, his friend Joe Schmucatellie comes along. Joe Schmucatellie introduces Joe Schmo to a new way of training, and, over the course of the next few years, takes Joe Schmo's bench press from 315 to 405. Joe Schmo stalls out for a while on the lift, and becomes, once again, content that he has reached his "Genetic Limit," until one day...well you get the picture. Joe Schmo's problem, is not that he has reached his "Genetic Limit," but that he doesn't have that inner drive, or the right training program that will allow him to continue to get stronger.
Could the same thing be said about BBing? It may be a little far fetch to think that someone could reach the size of a Coleman or a Cutler naturally. But, again, take your averge Joe Schmo the Gym Rat. Does this person, who weighs an amazing 200lbs with 15-20% body fat, have that inner drive that is going to make him realize his dream of weighing 225lbs, and being below 8%body fat? or are they more content at saying that they are at their "Genetic Limit" because they are lazy and dont want to put in the work that will get them where they want to be?
I think that far too many times, people set a mental barrier in their head. They say "Gee, 315, that's a lot of weight on the bench press." They get under the bar, think about the weight, and can't get the weight off their chest. If you read anything about some of the people that hold, or held, a world record (Brent Mikesell, Mike Miller, Ryan Kennely, Scot Mendelson, Ed Coan) they all have the same mind set. When they get under a weight, they dont think about the weight, they dont even look at the weight. All they know is that it is there, and that they have to move it. I can almost guarantee you, that if Scot Mendelson had thought to himself that 700lbs was a lot of weight to be bench pressing, then he would have never would have been the first person the bench over 800. Do these guys use anabolics, your guess is probably the same as mine, I'm just using it as an example of someone who doesn't set mental barriers.
 
No-one - not Ronnie, Dorian or Arnold have come close to their genetic potential. They may have come a HELL of a lot closer than most people, even when considering that their potential is also greater than most - yet still, to achieve your genetic potential you would have to do everything ABSOLUTELY PERFECT from BIRTH through to the age where your body starts reversing (35-45?)

The point that I believe that people should accept as reaching their potential, is the point at which additional efforts in their physical routine (exercise/diet/etc.) are outweighed by the benefits of doing something in another facet of their life, ie emotional, financial, spiritual, etc. This is of course objective (and therefore different) for every one of us, and probably is what really happens - therefore some people are huge and ripped and other give more focus to other things...
 
I pretty much agree with what you are saying. Many people use the whole idea of genetic limit as an excuse as to why they are plateaud. I am quite guilty of doing that for the last year, but this year there is no excuses -- I will make a difference. I'd like to add 100 total to the big three.
 
So, the question for strength becomes: what is the next training method after the most advanced techniques used at WSB?
 
nelmsjer said:
So, the question for strength becomes: what is the next training method after the most advanced techniques used at WSB?

or does the WSB continue to evolve, as lifters get stronger?
 
Well it definitely exists. There are simply a lot of guys walking around that will never bench 600 Raw no matter what they do or how much they weigh. One can always push themselves to get better but a lot of success in strength sports does come down to physics and having reasonably good leverages. That said it is a major overused excuse. It's kind of tough with bodybuilding and anabolics in the equation. Test levels are part of your genetics and predetermined, then someone who has very efficient receptors sand tolerance to sides takes 5 grams a week and a heap of other stuff. That's sort of outside genetics. I guess the same could be said about those involved in strength training but it's to a much lesser degree and not as night and day as in hypertrophy only.
 
there has to be a genetic limit to strength. consider it. imagine joe schmo busts ass in the gym and then uses some hypnotism or some such thing to psyche himself that he can bench 600 raw. is this alone enough? not necessarily... or there'd theoretically be more folks capable of doing it.
 
My wife was a competitive sprinter several years ago and she once said to me:

"You aren't serious about your sport if you are waiting to hit your genetic limit. You aren't serious about your sport if you are not doing everything that you can to get better."

Take it however you like...
 
I highly doubt that somewhere in our DNA is a 'governor' like on a go kart. I mean it's not like there's some guy at the controls that says, "all right, this fucker here ain't NEVER gonna squat 500 pounds".

I think that one is limited by how well they train/eat/etc. in the years that they can realistically make progress (at some point age will be a factor).
 
We're bandying a lot of numbers around which some can make and others can't. Let's take it to extremes and then someone say there is no genetic limit. Let's see someone suggest that anyone human will ever be able full-squat 500 tons raw. I think we can agree that there are genetic limits.

Back to sanity, though, I think we can also agree that everyone's potential is their own and that someone with a preponderance of slow-twitch muscle will have a lower potential maximum strength than someone else with a huge preponderance of fast-twitch fibres.

Gains slow down as you progress but that needn't mean they ever stop. If I do have a maximum potential maybe I can get half-way towards it year after year without ever reaching it and yet still be improving year after year.
 
Perhaps it's a semantic point, but the term 'genetic potential' suggests to me that somewhere inside your genes there's an exact, set limit that you can't cross. I think the term is misleading for that reason.

A predispositon to accel [EDIT: excel :rolleyes:]in certain activities and have less success in others is obvious, but the idea that one could arrive at an exact point of performance that just couldn't be improved upon due to genes alone is a notion I don't accept as valid.
 
Last edited:
My ludicrous example of many tons was to show that there is some weight X you will never be able to squat no matter how hard or how well you train. I picked a crazy value for X but it must exist. There is some value for X which is an ounce above what you will ever be able to lift. Logic demands it.
 
We could always pick a better example...

...like squatting 1,200 lbs. It can be done. Is it my genetics that are limiting me?
 
:) Logic might demand that we each have a limit but it isn't going to help us find it.

I expect 1200 lbs to be in excess of some could ever lift yet within what others could. If it's not 1200, though, then how about 1250, or 1500? We all must have a limit but I suspect that it's a long way beyond that which almost everyone could hope to drive themselves to in the gym. We've all heard stories of people performing super-human feats when a loved-one's life is on the line. We even have 'clutch' lifters who seem somehow to excel when that one, final lift will give them victory and perform way beyond any training session.
 
b fold the truth said:
We could always pick a better example...

...like squatting 1,200 lbs. It can be done. Is it my genetics that are limiting me?

ok... now how about 10000 lbs?
in your earlier post you mentioned what your wife said... well to me what that means is that i (or whoever) should never use genes as an excuse for non performance and keep trying hard with a positive attitude. but for academic sake i guess, u have to say there are numbers which a given individual will not be able to achieve naturally. sure it's possible he can gain continuously but there will come a time when the ageing process first slows down, then stops and eventually causes regression rather then progression. doesn't that equate to a genetic limit.
another example... a handful of human beings out of billions were able to run the 100m in under 10 seconds... sure, the others were not trained but can we assume that had they been trained in the same or similar way, then they too could have done a sub 10 second 100m?
:Chef:
 
of course we all have limits.. but at least in a society wher everything is done for us.. nobdy will ever push themselves long enough to reach those potentials...

there will be given days where one can honestly say damn i worked my ass off.. but can you honestly say you will do this consecutively for long periods of time? Doubt it.. But in truth this is the only way this limit could ever be reached.
 
By the way i think when joe schmoe says he has reach his genetic limit.. he is simply stating he just can't push himself any furth.. doesn't mean he has reach his genetic cap..

it's similar to a child saying i can't go to bed.. It's not because he can't go to bed.. If he the child got up off the couch stopped playing xbox360 and got his ass in bed, he could.. Just as Joe Schmoe, If he gives him self time and has set attainable goals, will be able to do the same.

That is of course if the goals are Attainable.. wich i guess brings about a second question.. genetic limitation and possible setting attainable goals.

Ahh who knows maybe i'm just typing to myself....
 
*MissFit* said:
By the way i think when joe schmoe says he has reach his genetic limit.. he is simply stating he just can't push himself any furth.. doesn't mean he has reach his genetic cap..

it's similar to a child saying i can't go to bed.. It's not because he can't go to bed.. If he the child got up off the couch stopped playing xbox360 and got his ass in bed, he could.. Just as Joe Schmoe, If he gives him self time and has set attainable goals, will be able to do the same.

That is of course if the goals are Attainable.. wich i guess brings about a second question.. genetic limitation and possible setting attainable goals.

Ahh who knows maybe i'm just typing to myself....

i'm listening ;-)
 
I think we can agree that when most people whinge about genetic limits, they just need some fresh education and remotivation.

To me the real question is whether it's feasible to expect to be able to improve year on year until your body gives out. Also, what rate of decline of improvement is part of being human? No-one really expects to continue getting newbie gains indefinitely but how do the gains of a 20-year veteran compare with those of a five-year veteran or a ten-year veteran?
 
*MissFit* said:
of course we all have limits.. but at least in a society wher everything is done for us.. nobdy will ever push themselves long enough to reach those potentials...

there will be given days where one can honestly say damn i worked my ass off.. but can you honestly say you will do this consecutively for long periods of time? Doubt it.. But in truth this is the only way this limit could ever be reached.

this is exactly my point. so many people use it as an excuse that it makes me sick. all it is, is an excuse for thier inability to push themself. instead of training harder, they say "i've reached my genetic limit..." i guarantee you will never hear a top athlete say this.
 
silver_shadow said:
ok... now how about 10000 lbs?
in your earlier post you mentioned what your wife said... well to me what that means is that i (or whoever) should never use genes as an excuse for non performance and keep trying hard with a positive attitude. but for academic sake i guess, u have to say there are numbers which a given individual will not be able to achieve naturally. sure it's possible he can gain continuously but there will come a time when the ageing process first slows down, then stops and eventually causes regression rather then progression. doesn't that equate to a genetic limit.
another example... a handful of human beings out of billions were able to run the 100m in under 10 seconds... sure, the others were not trained but can we assume that had they been trained in the same or similar way, then they too could have done a sub 10 second 100m?
:Chef:

A lot of what she meant is this:

You may never know your genetic limits because of...
1) The lifter who is the most serious on all levels will do whatever it takes to get to the next level, including anabolics, androgenics, and all the extras.
2) Most people will quit long before they really have to give 100% in all areas.
 
Top Bottom