Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Foreskin on a man???

cutitup

New member
Has anyone regretted being circumsized??? i used to think it was better but would love to have the extra skin for some reason. Good hygiene of course. i am trying a new technique to restore foreskin and it is working- the wife loves it!
Any ladies prefer uncut??? (keeping in mind the person has excellent hygiene)
 
uh...no regrets, and i've had no complaints . my shit is pretty and the chicks like it. nuff said.haha
 
I'm glad I am circumcised. I posted some studies in another thread by John Hopkins University, and by the British Medical Journal, that stated it was MUCH healthier to be circumcised.
 
There is no way your wife is in her 20's. I'll bet there is not a single woman in her 20's or even early 30's that would dig that. While you're at it, let the hair on your chest and back grow in (don't forget the ass hair, that's some sexy stuff).
 
SVT-TROY said:
There is no way your wife is in her 20's. I'll bet there is not a single woman in her 20's or even early 30's that would dig that. While you're at it, let the hair on your chest and back grow in (don't forget the ass hair, that's some sexy stuff).
i like women with ass hair thats fuggin hot :p
 
i STILL have issues with my patents for clipping me at birth.....and they complain about my body piercings???? saying that "I" mutilated myself????? :rolleyes:
 
I'm glad I never had a son because I wouldn't want to have to make that decision for him. Personally I prefer cut but I can see why so many guys like being natural.
 
I have no problems with my current state (cut) and I suppose most men don't either. By the time you're old enough to understand the difference you don't care anymore.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
infant circumcision is FUCKING BARBARIC !!! :kaioken:
No it's not, it's a very sanitary, clean practice. I posted studies in another thread that said it was much healthier to have a circumcised penis.
 
WORKIN' ON IT said:
There is nothing wrong with being "un-cut" but I have to say I prefer "cut"... It looks prettier.
Exactly what 99% of girls have told me. Either that or they don't care. I've never heard of a chic preferring uncut, but I've heard many times them preferring cut.
 
Being cut must feel must like youre wearing ten condoms as opposed to being uncut.
Sensitivity wise.
Thank you Mom
 
Jay1 said:
Being cut must feel must like youre wearing ten condoms as opposed to being uncut.
Sensitivity wise.
Thank you Mom
Pure bull. Plus, you probably bust in 30 seconds for your overly "sensitive" glands.
 
How would you know if its bull ?
and trust me Ive learned to master my domain,
high school was another story but I could bust twice without stopping.
 
Jay1 said:
How would you know if its bull ?
and trust me Ive learned to master my domain,
high school was another story but I could bust twice without stopping.
Cause I have plenty of feeling down there, any more and it just wouldn't be cool.
 
CrazyK said:
No it's not
It's cutting skin off a baby's penis...unnecessary surgery on infants= FUCKING BARBARIC

CrazyK said:
it's a very sanitary, clean practice. I posted studies in another thread that said it was much healthier to have a circumcised penis.
Then let me tie you down and hack off 15 cubic inches of skin off your most sensitive body part, in the name of a health survey.
This topic came up before and the uncut Euro EF'ers had no health problems with their foreskins.

I have a circumcision scar, that is big, black and fucking atrocious. Don't you think I should have been the one to make the decision?

The argument that it's OK to be done, 'cause babies don't remember the pain of the procedur is ludicrous.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
It's cutting skin off a baby's penis...unnecessary surgery on infants= FUCKING BARBARIC


Then let me tie you down and hack off 15 cubic inches of skin off your most sensitive body part, in the name of a health survey.
This topic came up before and the uncut Euro EF'ers had no health problems with their foreskins.

I have a circumcision scar, that is big, black and fucking atrocious. Don't you think I should have been the one to make the decision?

The argument that it's OK to be done, 'cause babies don't remember the pain of the procedur is ludicrous.
LOL! It is a nessacary procedure if you want to have your dingy be as healthy as it can be. Look at the John Hopkins University, and British Medical Journal studies done on the subject. Every one of them pointed that you were well better off in life being circumcised. It's not to say that because you are uncut something MUST happen to you, but you are better off being cut. Can't argue with science. It's like wearing a condom, you might fuck away your whole life and not run in to one single problem, then again you might get an std after one time not using the glove. You're just better off.
 
CrazyK said:
LOL! It is a nessacary procedure if you want to have your dingy be as healthy as it can be. Look at the John Hopkins University, and British Medical Journal studies done on the subject. Every one of them pointed that you were well better off in life being circumcised. It's not to say that because you are uncut something MUST happen to you, but you are better off being cut. Can't argue with science. It's like wearing a condom, you might fuck away your whole life and not run in to one single problem, then again you might get an std after one time not using the glove. You're just better off.

Only by an extremely small margin

margin smaller than the number of people who get complications from the surgery. There is scientific evidence supporting both ways.
 
I am happy to be natural.

The only argument that can be made for cutting it, realistically, is that women prefer the way it looks uncut. This is not too important IMO because when erect they look almost the same. Also some people who havent seen many or any uncut dicks think they all have oversized foreskins. like the cock is hidden in there. That's the least good looking form... Most guys the foreskin doesn't reach all the way across the head.
As far as there is any difference in feeling, having foreskin actually gives more stimulation.

Funny thing is I think girls preferance (which is BTW only really there in the USA) taking this for a reason is pathetic. The ultimate form of being PUSSYWHIPPED.... girls kinda want you to cut a piece of your DICK OFF, so you just do it....

One more thing.... Blowjobs... aren't they awesome?
An uncut man has far, far more sensation in the head of his penis. BJ's simply have to be a greater sensation to them.

Let alone the foreskin itself! it's far more sensitive than just any piece of skin. It feels great during sex. feels good to touch it. stroking it provokes an erection. It's PART OF THE DICK not just a cover for the head.
 
Robert Jan said:
I am happy to be natural.

The only argument that can be made for cutting it, realistically, is that women prefer the way it looks uncut. This is not too important IMO because when erect they look almost the same. Also some people who havent seen many or any uncut dicks think they all have oversized foreskins. like the cock is hidden in there. That's the least good looking form... Most guys the foreskin doesn't reach all the way across the head.
As far as there is any difference in feeling, having foreskin actually gives more stimulation.

Funny thing is I think girls preferance (which is BTW only really there in the USA) taking this for a reason is pathetic. The ultimate form of being PUSSYWHIPPED.... girls kinda want you to cut a piece of your DICK OFF, so you just do it....

One more thing.... Blowjobs... aren't they awesome?
An uncut man has far, far more sensation in the head of his penis. BJ's simply have to be a greater sensation to them.

Let alone the foreskin itself! it's far more sensitive than just any piece of skin. It feels great during sex. feels good to touch it. stroking it provokes an erection. It's PART OF THE DICK not just a cover for the head.


Although the skin is back when erect it can still go up and down - I have a lot of skin so I can go whatever way
 
Robert Jan said:
Only by an extremely small margin

margin smaller than the number of people who get complications from the surgery. There is scientific evidence supporting both ways.
That is NOT true. Look at the studies I posted in the other circumcision thread by ElvisP. All said that you are considerably more at risk for many diseases. You on the other hand, haven't posted anything or any studies. BTW, if you do find one, please make it be from an accredited University, and not "WE LOVE UNCUT COCKS.COM", thank you.
 
CrazyK said:
That is NOT true. Look at the studies I posted in the other circumcision thread by ElvisP. All said that you are considerably more at risk for many diseases. You on the other hand, haven't posted anything or any studies. BTW, if you do find one, please make it be from an accredited University, and not "WE LOVE UNCUT COCKS.COM", thank you.
He doesn't need studies about uncut peni, he's the owner of one. If he's had no problems, then I'd say that his position is very justified.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
He doesn't need studies about uncut peni, he's the owner of one. If he's had no problems, then I'd say that his position is very justified.
Yeah, I've fucked 50000000 women with out a condom. I've never had a problem, guess everyone should do as me also?


Arguing with science will yield diminishing returns ulcasterdropout.
 
CrazyK said:
Yeah, I've fucked 50000000 women with out a condom. I've never had a problem, guess everyone should do as me also?


Arguing with science will yield diminishing returns ulcasterdropout.
Here is a link...
http://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/plastibell/circ.mov
Does it justify the removal of the potential of the growth of bacteria under the foreskin? Fuck no IMHO!
I'd like to take the doctor that mutilated my penis and drag his ass out to the woods, gag 'em and cut him like a fucking pig, and then go to work on his family!
The child is strapped down, no local or general anaesthesia is used.
The baby feels the whole ordeal!!!!

Wouldn't you just rather take some antibiotics if a problem occured, then having brutal, unnecessary, unanesthetized, infant surgery?

If having forskin was so dangerious, it would not be present in the modern evolved human. The owners would have died and not reproduced.

It's tradition, not science at work here.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
Here is a link...
http://www.cirp.org/library/procedure/plastibell/circ.mov
Does it justify the removal of the potential of the growth of bacteria under the foreskin? Fuck no IMHO!
I'd like to take the doctor that mutilated my penis and drag his ass out to the woods, gag 'em and cut him like a fucking pig, and then go to work on his family!
The child is strapped down, no local or general anaesthesia is used.
The baby feels the whole ordeal!!!!

Wouldn't you just rather take some antibiotics if a problem occured, then having brutal, unnecessary, unanesthetized, infant surgery?

If having forskin was so dangerious, it would not be present in the modern evolved human. The owners would have died and not reproduced.

It's tradition, not science at work here.
A. That link means nothing compared to what I've brought on here.

B. It isn't mutilation, I don't remember any bit of it, and either will any baby.

C. Bacteria formation beneath the foreskin is the LEAST of your worries. Look at the thread about circumcision started by ElvisP. I posted studies there that clearly state it is healthIER to be circumcised for many reasons.
 
CrazyK said:
A. That link means nothing compared to what I've brought on here.
Then link the post. Non-plat search is worthless. That video speaks a million words, even to a stuborn pro- cut like you...
I had tonsillitis as a adult. Should I had my tonsils cut out during infancy for the chance of a healthier throat, or wait till a problem occured?
CrazyK said:
B. It isn't mutilation, I don't remember any bit of it, and either will any baby.
It isn't mutilation if they don't remember it . WTF!?!
So would it be OK for me to rape your mom or sister as long as they don't remember it?
CrazyK said:
C. Bacteria formation beneath the foreskin is the LEAST of your worries. Look at the thread about circumcision started by ElvisP. I posted studies there that clearly state it is healthIER to be circumcised for many reasons.
I've chatted with soooo many un-cut folks, man. Not a single complaint.
Are they all statistical rogues? Not paper or studies, real people...
I've come across chat boards of men that are growing their's back via stretching.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
Then link the post. Non-plat search is worthless. That video speaks a million words, even to a stuborn pro- cut like you...
I had tonsillitis as a adult. Should I had my tonsils cut out during infancy for the chance of a healthier throat, or wait till a problem occured?

It isn't mutilation if they don't remember it . WTF!?!
So would it be OK for me to rape your mom or sister as long as they don't remember it?

I've chatted with soooo many un-cut folks, man. Not a single complaint.
Are they all statistical rogues? Not paper or studies, real people...
I've come across chat boards of men that are growing their's back via stretching.
It's not mutilation if it's a safe and sanitary practice, done for good reason, and backed by scientific studies. I'm not going to go through elvisp's 1000 posts to find that post again, go search around yourself, shouldn't be too far back anyway. I've chatted with MANY people who never use a condom, and never have got an STD, are the a statistical rogue? UMMM YESS!!!!

Bottom line is you could go your whole life without a problem being uncut, and the majority of uncut guys that take care of themselves will be just fine, but they are not BETTER OFF than a guy who is cut all variables being equal.
 
CrazyK said:
Bottom line is you could go your whole life without a problem being uncut, and the majority of uncut guys that take care of themselves will be just fine
...coulda conceded that an hour ago :rolleyes:
 
CrazyK said:
Read the rest of what I said dumbass.
Why, you proved my point for me. LOL. You wrote it....
LOL@ dumbass. Settle down, Beavis
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
Why, you proved my point for me. LOL. You wrote it....
LOL@ dumbass. Settle down, Beavis
Well anything can be taken out of context. I could take pieces of what you said and put them toghether and make you look like a total ass.
 
CrazyK said:
Well anything can be taken out of context. I could take pieces of what you said and put them toghether and make you look like a total ass.
I make whole posts to make me look like an ass...;)
CrazyK said:
Could of concluded this about an hour ago too
Ad hominem fallacy wouldn't work on me...Attack the premises, not the person...shame on you.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
I make whole posts to make me look like an ass...;)

Ad hominem fallacy wouldn't work on me...Attack the premises, not the person...shame on you.
lol, you're a weird dude mang.
 
CrazyK said:
lol, you're a weird dude mang.
Yeah, I'm a fucking fruitcake with a big ugly black scar on my dick...
My procedure didn't go as planned. Now I'm quite bitter as to the fact that I was not privy to the choice...
We'll never agree on this matter, but I'll give you green K for perseverance.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
Yeah, I'm a fucking fruitcake with a big ugly black scar on my dick...
My procedure didn't go as planned. Now I'm quite bitter as to the fact that I was not privy to the choice...
We'll never agree on this matter, but I'll give you green K for perseverance.
You seriously have a big black scar on your dick? lol! Lot's of surgeries get fucked up, from heart surgery to breast implants, eventually it'll happen. You're right though, we will never agree, so no point in arguing further.
 
CrazyK said:
You seriously have a big black scar on your dick? lol!
Yes I do. I wouldn't make that up. It's not so LOL to be the owner. It's bloody hideous...
 
The funny thing is: this thread was for the women to give their opinion. Only two responded (both said they prefer cut, batting a thousand). You might as well create a poll so your question can be answered. BTW, uncuts, who cares what you think of your dick, it matters what the ladies think.
 
I just thought of something...a weird kind of thing. Why don't women have bacteria problems from having a hood intact over their clits? The clit and the penis are basically the same thing, just the girls version is much smaller and if you've ever seen a girl who's juiced to the extreme, her clit grows to look like a small penis but it is the same shape with a head and all. The hood can be pulled back exposing the clit similarly to the way a man's foreskin is pulled back with an erection. My hood has a verticle piercing and when the barbell is held up it exposes my clit completely and oral is fantastic like that...much better than before. I guess with guys since the foreskin is tugged back with an erection the foreskin doesn't get in the way of sensations.

OK...my weird thinking is done for the night...I hope. ;)
 
Puddles said:
I just thought of something...a weird kind of thing. Why don't women have bacteria problems from having a hood intact over their clits? The clit and the penis are basically the same thing, just the girls version is much smaller and if you've ever seen a girl who's juiced to the extreme, her clit grows to look like a small penis but it is the same shape with a head and all. The hood can be pulled back exposing the clit similarly to the way a man's foreskin is pulled back with an erection. My hood has a verticle piercing and when the barbell is held up it exposes my clit completely and oral is fantastic like that...much better than before. I guess with guys since the foreskin is tugged back with an erection the foreskin doesn't get in the way of sensations.

OK...my weird thinking is done for the night...I hope. ;)


They DO have bacteria on there

just like on every other damn part of skin

its normal
 
Top Bottom