Five Weird Questions

[Nelson Montana]

Just for fun...


(This more of a psycological evaluation. Thereare no "wrong" respones)

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?


Honest answers please.

 

[ProtienFiend]

1) Yes, Havent used them yet

2) Probably not.

3) Yes I would... I am 6'6

4) Less fat

5) def. not ronnie... I would pick whoever is the most symetrical/aesthecially pleasing

 

[powerforward]

1)yes
2)probably not
3)no
4)extra muscle
5)haney

 

[mt]

Just for fun...


(This more of a psycological evaluation. Thereare no "wrong" respones)

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?


Honest answers please.

1. Yes. No bulking.
2. Yes.
3. No.
4. Extra pound of muscle.
5. Frank Zane

 

[c3bodybuilding]

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

Of course! I was into all of this years before I even knew what they were. Now that I'm done with them, the only thing I do different is use a lot of your methods, along with Vince Gironda, Steve Reeves, etc. I feel those methods are the best for a natural (of juiced) bber to make the best gains.

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

Nope.

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

No way! You can earn muscle, but you can't do much about height.

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?
One more lb of muscle. that would be one more lb around helping me burn fat 24/7.

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?

Someone like Frank Zane, Reeves, Arnold, etc. Haney was pushing it, and Coleman, forget that. Did he give birth yet? Not for me, I'll take a Reeves or a Zane any day.

 

[Anakin]

1) yes. nothing differently.
2) i don't know.
3) i'm 5'10, i can't cut that deal.
4) extra muscle. it's easier to lose fat than to gain muscle.
5) Frank Zane without a doubt.



Nelson here is a good question that I was thinking about posting a few days ago:
5b) Would you rather be huge but not "handsome" (for lack of a better word) OR not particularly big (though I'm not saying extremely skinny, just a regular athletic physique) but very "handsome" (i.e. pretty face and attractive to the ladies).

I think I would rather be Brad Pitt than Frank Zane, overall. Yes I would rather have Zane's body, but if it had to be one or the other... what woman wouldn't want to be with Brad Pitt?
I'm ready to get flamed.

 

[Nelson Montana]

1) yes. nothing differently.
2) i don't know.
3) i'm 5'10, i can't cut that deal.
4) extra muscle. it's easier to lose fat than to gain muscle.
5) Frank Zane without a doubt.



Nelson here is a good question that I was thinking about posting a few days ago:
5b) Would you rather be huge but not "handsome" (for lack of a better word) OR not particularly big (though I'm not saying extremely skinny, just a regular athletic physique) but very "handsome" (i.e. pretty face and attractive to the ladies).

I think I would rather be Brad Pitt than Frank Zane, overall. Yes I would rather have Zane's body, but if it had to be one or the other... what woman wouldn't want to be with Brad Pitt?
I'm ready to get flamed.

No contest-- handsome! If you're good looking, all you have to be is be somewhat fit and you'll still get pleny of fine tang. I would hate to see the women that Paul Dillet fucks.

 

[manny78]

Just for fun...


(This more of a psycological evaluation. Thereare no "wrong" respones)

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?


Honest answers please.

1- no. if everyone is on the same level, then its fair.

2- no

3- no

4- one less pound of fat cause it looks like you have 3 extra pounds of muscle.

5- Frank Zane

 

[c3bodybuilding]

If I had to pick being good looking or very built, I would just go with Steve Reeves. He was both.

 

[wutangnomo]

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?

Honest answers please.

1) I haven't done juice so far so yes, I would still be a bodybuilder. I wouldn't change anything I am doing now.

2) Can't answer as I haven't done steroids.

3) I'm already short as it is (5'7.5") and don't want to get any shorter. I'll take the muscle.

4) I'd take an extra pound of muscle because that would only increase my fat burning.

5) It's a toss up between Zane and Haney. Some days I feel like a Zane, others a Haney. With my metabolism and height as it is now, a Haney would be much more difficult to maintain, so realistically a Zane would be more ideal for me.

 

[chaquito]

Five Weird Questions

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just for fun...


(This more of a psycological evaluation. Thereare no "wrong" respones)

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

im not a bodybuilder but yes, i would still train. i have my diet ant training in check and i dont belive in nutritional suplementes beside a good protein. what i would do differently? i think i would be using more supplements, you know all those exotics things from muscle-tech or universal nutrition

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

yes i still have. i will just fool myself i my answer on this one were a NO. but of course all depense in how dangerous the drug is. if injecting "steroid X" would kill me guaranteed in 3 years from now i would no take it.

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

yes i would since im already a tall guy (184 cm), going down at 180 i would still be tall.

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

an extra pound of muscle.

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?

ronnie coleman is a monster. Lee Haney is too big. frank zane is also big but he is the smaller of those tree guys. my choice is Frank Zane.

Honest answers please.

 

[Nighthawkk]

1- Yes, I'd change nothing
2- Doubt it
3- No, I'm 5'9"
4- 1 lb less fat (at least right now...)
5- Zane for sure

 

[Singleton]

1- of course! I did it for 10 years w/o steroids. I'm really new to them.

2 - depends what sort of risks

3 - Nope. 5'11" would be too short. I'll stay 6'1"

4 - right now, 1 less 1lb of fat. I'm cutting.

5 - Zane, of course!

 

[Optimus B]

Just for fun...


(This more of a psycological evaluation. Thereare no "wrong" respones)

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?


Honest answers please.

1) definitely yes. i wouldn't do too much differently
2) as long as the proper precautions (ancillaries, supplements, etc) could be taken to minimize their sides, then yes.
3) no, i'm only 5'9" as it is!
4) one less pound of fat (fat takes up more volume, so one less pound of fat would make me appear bigger )
5) serge nubret

 

[TxLonghorn]

Just for fun...

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?


Honest answers please.

1 No, but then I don't consider myself a bber now. Would I still train? Of course.
2 Of course, but then I think dnp is ok, lol.
3 Nope, couldn't do that, I'm almost a midget as is.
4 Muscle. I can lose fat, muscle is almost impossible to come by with my genetics.
5 Zane. The others are what I think of as bbers, and I just have no desire for that kind of size.

 

[ham2]

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

NEVER DONE STEROIDS ( YET ).
THIS SHOWS I LOVE THE GYM AS & FOR ITSELF.

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

IT ALL DEPENDS. STEROIDS ARE *NOT* DANGEROUS. ABUSE OF THE SAME IS. THERE'S NO MEDICINAL STRENGHT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM & MANY PRESCRIPTION DRUGS TO CURE EX ASTHMA, DIABETES OR SEVERE FLU'S ETC.

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

I'M 1M78CM BUT I'D BE TALLER. MUSCLE YOU CAN ALWAYS GAIN SOME.

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

LESS FAT

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?

AMONG THEM, ZANE BUT I'D OPT FOR REEVES OR ARNOLD ANY TIME. THEY WERE IN GREAT SHAPE YEAR ROUND, NOT JUST A FORTNIGHT FOR A SHOW BEFORE BEING TORN BETWEEN DIALYSIS, ER & OXYGEN BOOTS

 

[genarr3]

Just for fun...


(This more of a psycological evaluation. Thereare no "wrong" respones)

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?


Honest answers please.

1)Nothing. I worked out for years before I even knew what steroids were.
2)No
3)No way
4)One less pound of fat
5)That's a no brainer - Frank Zane.

 

[Mr. dB]

Just for fun...


(This more of a psycological evaluation. Thereare no "wrong" respones)

1)...Imagine a world with no steroids. (Egad!)
Would you still be a bodybuilder? What would you do differently?

2)...Lets say that roids were twice as dangerous as they really are. Would you still use them?

3)...If you could have 10 pounds of instant, permanent fat free muscle, but you'd be two inches shorter. Would you cut that deal?

4)..What would you rather have...an extra pound of muscle or one less pound of fat?

5)...(I've asked this one before, but the answers are always interesting) If you could have the body of either Frank Zane, Lee Haney or Ronnie Coleman, whose would you choose?


Honest answers please.

1: I'd still lift
2: Probably
3: Are you talking 2" of height, or endowment? Either way, yes.
4: Extra pound of muscle
5: Haney