Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Facts for RyanH and anti-gunners
- Thread starter FrankRizzo
- Start date
Honastly no. But the basic assult rifle can hold down a squad but that is providing i have enouph ammo. Realisticly I hope I am not around when the united states feals that civilians should not have firearms because chances are me and my family would proubly be put in camps for our beliefs. No I proublly would not shoot at our service members, But i hope im never in that situation.
Salami,
1.) You ignored my question about your stereotypical statement above which slanders gunowners as all dumb rednecks. Pleadse reply to what I asked.
2.) One citizen certainly cannot take out an Army. That is why the populace of this Nation is considered a Militia, as is mentioned in the Bill of Rights.
The citizens may form, with their privately-owned weapons, to oppose a government and its Army if such a government becomes tyrannical.
That's the whole point of having amilitia. What sort of checks and balances would there be if the only people armed were the very Army which serves a governemnt which has become tyrannical????
That is why private citizens (i.e.. - the Militia) are (suposed to be) allowed to own and bear whatever weapons teh average foot soldier of the Government's Army carries.
1.) You ignored my question about your stereotypical statement above which slanders gunowners as all dumb rednecks. Pleadse reply to what I asked.
2.) One citizen certainly cannot take out an Army. That is why the populace of this Nation is considered a Militia, as is mentioned in the Bill of Rights.
The citizens may form, with their privately-owned weapons, to oppose a government and its Army if such a government becomes tyrannical.
That's the whole point of having amilitia. What sort of checks and balances would there be if the only people armed were the very Army which serves a governemnt which has become tyrannical????
That is why private citizens (i.e.. - the Militia) are (suposed to be) allowed to own and bear whatever weapons teh average foot soldier of the Government's Army carries.
RyanH
New member
Again and Again, WeaponX misconstrues the second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Second Amendment contains the all important yet often ignored term "well-regulated" militia. Thus, the framers intended that firearms be regulated. Surely, the framers did not intend that the militia be regulated, but not the citizens.
Frank: As far as these random numbers are concerned, as Salami mentioned, the numbers are going to be higher in Gore districts since Gore carried largers cities, such as New York and L.A., always bastions for crime.
Gin-n-Juice: Citing the number of accidental deaths from gun ownership tells us nothing about the number of criminals who use guns----Criminals are what concerns the gun control lobby, not accidental deaths. Thus, your numbers really take us nowhere.
Why don't we put forth numbers related to how many deaths would have been reduced last year, if criminals had not had access to guns..........eh?
Frank: As far as these random numbers are concerned, as Salami mentioned, the numbers are going to be higher in Gore districts since Gore carried largers cities, such as New York and L.A., always bastions for crime.
Gin-n-Juice: Citing the number of accidental deaths from gun ownership tells us nothing about the number of criminals who use guns----Criminals are what concerns the gun control lobby, not accidental deaths. Thus, your numbers really take us nowhere.
Why don't we put forth numbers related to how many deaths would have been reduced last year, if criminals had not had access to guns..........eh?
All I know is that if Ryan's mom was getting raped he would not stop her from using a gun. So why don't I have the same right?
I guess he could always let his mom get raped, catch the guy after he rapes 10 more women and then rehabilitate him to be useful to society. Afterall, god knows McDonald's could use the help.
I guess he could always let his mom get raped, catch the guy after he rapes 10 more women and then rehabilitate him to be useful to society. Afterall, god knows McDonald's could use the help.
F
Frackal
Guest
GinNJuice said:
This is bullshit, how many lives do guns save? Maybe some, but the only time guns normally save lives is by taking another (albeit possibly deserving) life.
How many people would die WITHOUT doctors? Sometimes, mistakes are made, but doctors save far more lives then guns do, that's for sure, a completely biased and bullshit comparison.
To make this fair, you'd have to compare how many people would die without doctors, nurses, physician, etc...and put that against how many people would die if there were no guns....I don't think I need to say which side would have a higher number.
On a side note, I think gun control is a bad idea, but I will still point out stupid arguments on both sides.
Similar threads
