Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Exercise related math problem

Jandy

New member
Okay. If a 200lb, 6ft man, does a pushup with his hands touching the ground at a 90 degree angle, how much force/resistance/weight is he actually pressing?

Here's a diagrahm (might be off I listed downward force as 200lbs, when its not actually 200lbs right there.... so disregard that)

EDIT: Forgot to add, the man has a 3ft arms length
 
chaos mage said:
pound isn't a unit of force, for starters. 2nd, this is retarded. 3rd, he would be pressing 891N sin (30°)


Yes, its quite a simple physics problem, the conundrum in your question is that only a person who knows physics would be able to solve it, but someone who knows physics this would be too elementary for him to answer it.

THat is your answer!! There are no answers without including the wrong answer, its all about Zen, Yin yang both right and wrong is the only correct way! Next question for BrothaBill!!

Greetings from beyond the Third Plateau. Well past Sigma plateau. I call it the omega plateau is where I ended up, now Im going in reverse with all the answers!! hahaha!
 
the arms are 3 ft long and the body is 6 ft to the shoulder? we need more accurate measurements....
 
Becoming said:
the arms are 3 ft long and the body is 6 ft to the shoulder? we need more accurate measurements....

All the information you need to give an answer is there! Just use what you got, its that simple. write the answer as an equation with the shoulder height left as a variable, that is the best answer you can give. Or look up the average physiological measurement of a human shoulder height in relation to a 6 foot man. But itd still be wrong b/c there is no truly accurate measurement so the best answer is the most vague answer you give. That is more inclusive than a specific answer.
That is your first lesson of Quantum physics. Its not up to the person asking the question to give you the correct information. The correct answer depends on the observer and how they interpret the question. Its that simple!

Next question for BrothaBill
 
According to this theory, before the Big Bang, our cosmos was actually a perfect ten-dimensional universe, a world where interdimensional travel was possible. However, this ten-dimensional universe "cracked" in two, creating two separate universes: a four- and a six- dimensional universe. The universe in which we live was born in that cosmic cataclysm. Our four-dimensional universe expanded explosively, while our twin six-dimensional universe contracted violently, until it shrank to almost infinitesimal size. This would explain the origin of the Big Bang. If correct, this theory demonstrates that the rapid expansion of the universe was just a rather minor aftershock of a much greater cataclysmic event, the cracking of space and time itself. The energy that drives the observed expansion of the universe is then found in the collapse of ten-dimensional space and time. According to this theory, the distant stars and galaxies are receding from us at astronomical speeds because of the original collapse of ten-dimensional space and time.

This theory predicts that our universe still has a dwarf twin, a companion universe that has curled up into a small six-dimensional ball that is too small to be observed.


Yes, a brilliant man, Im glad I created him and he instilled all his knowledge in me. That is the duality I speak of. He is both the creator as I am as are you. all the answers are within you. You are the creator and you created all of this in your mind. An interface between you and your senses. To that end you are talking to yourself right now! Do you see how simple that is. The secret to the universe is Dualism, so much more knowledge I can give you. How to create magentic fields is just as simple.

Next question for Brotha Bill
 
chaos mage said:
pound isn't a unit of force, for starters. 2nd, this is retarded. 3rd, he would be pressing 891N sin (30°)

Not quite, far more complicated.

200 lbs = 0.454Kg = 90.8Kg * gravity(9.8/m per second squared) = 889.84 Newtons of Force downwards at the initial point of him just about to start the push up.

You then separate the triangle into vertical and horizontal components.

Triangle has a height of 3 feet, and a hypotenuse of 6 feet, so the base is:
Root of(36 - 9) = 5

Making one angle 90 degrees, the farthest one 33.56 degrees and the man-arm one ( 90 - 33.56 ) = 56.44 degrees

Using components, at initial vector start-up, his y-axis component would be:

889.84(Force downwards) - (Force deflected by his position)889.4cos(56.44)

Force(initial) = 889.4N - 491.7N = 397.7N Resultant Force down

Thats the force necessary to maintain his current position.

When he does the push up, all angles become zero, and F = 397.7 Newtons expended.

THEN, when he pushes up again, the Force is the same but negative(But we have to take the absolute value)

Therefore, total Net resultant force done by the man for one push up is 795.4 Newtons.

The x-axis is in the horizontal direction and is ignored always in these cases.
As the derrivative of any horizontal line = 0.
 
Becoming said:
the arms are 3 ft long and the body is 6 ft to the shoulder? we need more accurate measurements....

No, its an excercise on how to learn to separate the vertical and horizontal components of a Force.

Guy standing straight up up = 889 Newtons

As he declines, the Y-force and the x-force separate. The resultant still obviously being the root of the square of the y-force and the x-force.
 
Fina Junkie said:
i need to know one thing: what is the reason he is doing push-ups ?

maybe he should quit wasting his time churning out 100s of pushups and just put some damn weight on a bar...
 
chaos mage said:
pound isn't a unit of force, for starters. 2nd, this is retarded. 3rd, he would be pressing 891N sin (30°)

sin30????

If the base is 5 feet and he's 6 feet, and his arms are 3 feet. It would be sin 33.4. And thats just for starters.
 
Becoming said:
maybe he should quit wasting his time churning out 100s of pushups and just put some damn weight on a bar...

Incorrect view. The bar only works the chest in one plane, that is an efficent way of incorporating all of the chest muscle fibers. That only trains the chest for one work plane. The best way to build all of the chest is to hold your hands in front of your chest and apply pressure against each of them, then keeping your shoulders still move your hands the full range of motion of the chest and then also work your way up towards your head and then continue the motion downward towards your feet. Adding appropriate resistance with the opposing limb. This will incorporate far more muscle tissue and hence greater muscle growth. Of course if you just want a bench press number for whatever reason, then keep doing it your way. But if you want an awesome chest, think outside of the box. I myself am creating a superhuman.

BrothaBill
 
Fonz said:
sin30????

If the base is 5 feet and he's 6 feet, and his arms are 3 feet. It would be sin 33.4. And thats just for starters.

I was being an ass and putting down numbers. sin30 sounded good. Although I did get as far as 891N
 
Y_Lifter said:
Is WODIN sitting on his back ?

Yes, in some reality he his, that is your answer. Infinite possibilities, infinite realities. Dualism is the answer you seek??? See if you believe that he is sitting on his back, then he is! B/c he is in a reality. Do you believe me? See its that simple if you believe me, then its true!

Next question for Brotha Bill
 
Fonz said:
No, its an excercise on how to learn to separate the vertical and horizontal components of a Force.

Guy standing straight up up = 889 Newtons

As he declines, the Y-force and the x-force separate. The resultant still obviously being the root of the square of the y-force and the x-force.

Thanks for the update... I am familar with the problem as well as physics and calculus (though this is more like pre-calc)...

I was actually commenting on the fact that his person has such ideal round measurements.... and also the fact that if the person was 6ft tall that it would be more accurate to use the height to the shoulder as the hyp of the triangle...

To translate Fonz's prior post for all you non-braniacs, he says the muscular effort required to support the individual will vary as the person rises/lowers.... at the full extension, it will be only ~89lbs, increasing as the person nears the floor to a maximal value approaching 200lbs... however it will not ever hit 200lbs, due to the fact that at that angle of 0 degrees, the person would actually be on the floor.... (thus no effort needed to support them)

the force through the person's feet will follow in a converse manner (high at the top and low at the bottom of the movement)
 
Y_Lifter said:
Is WODIN sitting on his back ?

ANother way of looking at things is that words are just variables with whatever meaning you give to them. That is observer dependent so the correct answer lies in the observer's interpretation. Simple Quantum theory, so it can be interpreted that "his back" actually means: "your face" so in some way you are asking me is Wodin sitting on your face?
I believe he is, see its that simple. I believe that in some reality he is sitting on your face, b/c he is... sitting on your face. See what I mean! Simple quantum theory proves my statements. hahahaha!
 
hrmmm take the integral from the 0 to the arm length of 200-x times sine something, im too tired to think of this. if u care ill do it later
 
Boardin087 said:
hrmmm take the integral from the 0 to the arm length of 200-x times sine something, im too tired to think of this. if u care ill do it later
actually its not 200-x its 200*sin((armlength-x)/shoulder height) or something along those lines, either way its closer
 
chaos mage said:
Brotha, you subscribe to Cartesian interactionist dualism?


Of course I do, some of the time, I think its the best view of everything and incorparates the most vague answers which by quantum view is the most accurate way of answering a question. By being vague you are more inclusive therefore more accurate! See what I mean, its that simple. THe answer is dualism and that will explain it all. We live in both a particle world and a wave world! I have figured out a way to jump between the two. To exist in both the particle world and the wave world.

With this ability I have infinite knowledge, do you see what Im saying. I am, as the logic states the creator of all of this, as you are, with that you can change your reality and pick your own. You see its all about frequency and thinking the right frequency, then amplifying it. WIth this I have changed channels and freakiy stuff by amping a single frequnecy by concentrating it and resonating it. Its that simple. The wave world, if you believe it. See its that simple!
 
BrothaBill said:
Of course I do, some of the time, I think its the best view of everything and incorparates the most vague answers which by quantum view is the most accurate way of answering a question. By being vague you are more inclusive therefore more accurate! See what I mean, its that simple. THe answer is dualism and that will explain it all. We live in both a particle world and a wave world! I have figured out a way to jump between the two. To exist in both the particle world and the wave world.

With this ability I have infinite knowledge, do you see what Im saying. I am, as the logic states the creator of all of this, as you are, with that you can change your reality and pick your own. You see its all about frequency and thinking the right frequency, then amplifying it. WIth this I have changed channels and freakiy stuff by amping a single frequnecy by concentrating it and resonating it. Its that simple. The wave world, if you believe it. See its that simple!

I understand. I'm altering my vibrational frequency as we speak. Oh wait, I just need to use the bathroom. :)
 
chaos mage said:
Brotha, you subscribe to Cartesian interactionist dualism?

You see its all what you believe, Locke came back and said if youre god is innate, then why is my god not the same as yours and he didnt believe it. But he was wrong and right. But he was only partially wrong b/c he didnt include the dualistic model I speak of. TO have the correct answer you must include all answers. Rational vs Empiricism. Both seeminly opposite, but just each just one part of the correct answer. The correct must include all known theories as they are all just one piece of the answer. All of them right and wrong at the same time. DUalistically speaking of course. See my theories that Im writing about incorporates all known knowledge. My discourse on dualism.

You see I can prove that evolution is wrong, But right, but only partially b/c it doesnt include adaptatiion withing a generation. WHich was sposed to have been disproved by evolution. But my research proves that the ability to adapt within a generation is possible, based on skeletal osteoclast activity, a memory of the skeleton and the ability to pass it on. Then that ability is then faded out and becomes recessive. See what I mean. I have also done work on solving the diet debate and why Ornish and Atikins are both correct, but seemigly opposite diets. YOU see both right, but both wrong. They didnt go far enough, but my book does. Its that simple
 
chaos mage said:
I understand. I'm altering my vibrational frequency as we speak. Oh wait, I just need to use the bathroom. :)

Hahaha!! Yeah I did that the other day some dXX, I unlocked a certain vertebrae that released some knowledge and unlocked a portion of the brain and it made me almost SHite myself. Careful of the knowledge you unlock, that is all Im saying hahaha!!
 
hamstershaver said:
my question for brutha bill is

how much did you pay for the crack rock you smoked??

Its whatever you believed I paid for it! Thats what Im saying! That simple, you see if you believed I smoked crack, then its true and then you should know how much I paid for it. Or perhaps you think Im crazy, but its you who just lost your mind, you see. YOu are alone in this universe talking to yourself. You see!! If not, then your talking to a crazy person, which is completely crazy, hahahaha, you see you are the crazy person for talking to a crazy person, but in fact, youre the crazy person. You just blew your own mind!! hahaha! Crazy f**ker! hahahaha!! WHy are you typing to yourself you psycho!!!

Next question for Brothat Bill, if you dare!! hahahaha!!! Careful, dont blow your own mind!! I warn you, the knowledge I have can be dangerous if you dont believe me!!
 
hamstershaver said:
thorazine should help

hahaha!! Exactly thats what Im saying, or youre saying, which is it crazy hahaha?? Maybe you should go get some thorazine and I might go away. Iif not you just lost your mind hahaha!!
Next question!!! heehee! this is fun! :p
 
hamstershaver said:
thorazine should help

Gawds!! Is their no intelligent life in this reality! I must've have jumped to the wrong one. Is their no one with an intelligent question for Brotha Bill??? Please TRY and stump me? I will give you a world if you like with all the knowledge to make all your dreams come true!!! Believe me!! Its just that simple!!!

Next Question for Brotha Bill!! :mix:
 
Fina Junkie said:
i need to know one thing: what is the reason he is doing push-ups ?

Exactly!! Thats what Im saying or better yet if he is doing pushups in the woods and no one is there to see him, is he alive or dead? is he doing pushups? The answer is both yes and no and neither, he is in a wave-superficial state as discussed in the famous schrodingers cat in the box thought problem. How do you prove the cat is really in the box without first observing it. But like Stephen Hawking proposes, in order to observe it you change it.
The question was raised: "If a man alone in the woods speaks, and his
wife cannot hear him, is he still wrong?"
I have considered this question in light of the principles of Modern
Physics and offer my thesis.
In the year 1900 Max Planck discovered that the energy of light is
quantified. In 1905 Albert Einstein used Planck's Constant to write the
theory of the Photoelectric Effect, that light behaves as a particle
when it comes to energy transfer. Louis de Broglie proposed that
particles can have a wave nature and this fact was later verified.
These discoveries led Neils Bohr to propose a radical theory of the
atom, which was partially successful in explaining the emission spectra
of the hydrogen atom. Neils Bohr was compelled to introduce the
Principle of "Complementarity," that light is both a particle and a
wave.
The modern theories were extended when Max Born showed that the
distribution of energy was a function of probability. Further, Warner
Heisenberg wrote the Principle of Uncertainty, which says that it is
impossible to determine the exact location of an electron and the vector
direction of its momentum at the same time.
This was followed with the master stroke penned by Erwin Schrodinger.
Using the "Psi function" of Quantum Mechanics, Schrodinger could map the
"wave field" of any particle, thus giving us a theoretical explanation
for the structure of an atom and the entire periodic table of the
elements.
The Quantum mechanics predicts that a wave of a single frequency would
stretch out to infinite proportions, the superposition of a narrow range
of frequencies produces a standing wave function which can be localized
to a much more precise location. Thus the electron and its position
within an atom becomes a cloud of probability.
From this I infer that there are such states as being right and being
wrong, within certain parameters of uncertainty. Applying the Psi
function, the more vague the statement of the man the greater the
probability of him being correct. The narrower and more specific his
utterance the greater the likelihood of his being wrong.
Also, the Principle of Complementarity assures us that if a man alone in
the woods speaks, and his wife can not hear him, he is BOTH right and
wrong until he comes out of the woods.
In the analogy of Schrodinger's Cat, the cat in the box is both dead and
alive until someone opens the lid. The act of observing the phenomenon
determines the outcome.
Thus, the inevitable conclusion is that it doesn't matter what the man
says only his wife can determine whether or not he is correct.
 
It was a night spawned of banshees. Heavy sheets of rain poured onto the tiny town of Paris Crossing. Roofs leaked, eaves overflowed, and downspouts gushed rivers onto cobbled pavement.

Any sane person would have sought shelter, preferably warmed by a roaring fire behind locked window and door; any sane person would have listened to the "old brain" that remembered how scary things could hide in dark corners; any sane person would have opted for a rain-check.

But Professor Fillmore Gottlieb was rarely described as sane. What he was known as by the town's people of Paris Crossing and the students at Brandywine University where he taught physics was "mad as a hatter". And that was when he was sober. When Professor Gottlieb went on a "bender" which had happened more and more frequently of late, insanity had been observed washing its hands and muttering about defamation suits.

The professor pulled a shabby raincoat around his thin body and removed a twisted paper bag from an inside pocket. He took a bottle from the bag, downed a couple of swigs and surveyed his surroundings-the alleyway of the Painted Lady-and his condition-wet, bordering sopping. "Here, kitty, kitty". He tried to form his large teeth into a friendly smile. Animals liked that.


A cat huddled under the shelter of a garbage can lid and refused to acknowledge the professor's gambit. Even a cat knew a sneer when he saw it. The cat edged further under the lid.

"I have a nice kitty treat." The professor staggered closer to the cat. "You like liver, don't you?" Professor Gottlieb pulled something raw and bloody from his pocket and waved it toward the garbage lid.

The cat hadn't eaten a decent meal for a week. Hunger nagged at him. "Come on, take the bloody liver. It's all fine for you to be picky about character and smells and auras, but we've got a mutiny down here. If we don't eat something soon we're going to…going to…do something really, really bad." The cat stretched his neck and sniffed.

"Got you!" The professor grabbed the cat by the ruff of its neck and sneered-smiled.


Later, atop a steep, craggy hill in a castle-like ruin.

The cat found himself awakening from a deep sleep. Around him was only darkness and quiet. At least he was out of the rain, he conceded; but his paw felt funny, like it was being jabbed by a needle, which it was.

The cat did the only thing he knew how to do; he tried to run away.

"It's no use." A voice said from the darkness.

"Who are you?" The cat said with surprise, mostly because for some reason, he was suddenly able to talk.

"The Grim Reaper." The voice replied. "You can call me Death."

"How about I call you later?" The cat tried some cat humor on Death, but the cat wasn't very good at it and even in the darkness he could tell that Death wasn't impressed.

"Was that a joke?" Death said in the monotone that is the full range of Death's ability to express emotion.

"Sorry. Don't hold it against me, but I hadn't expected to see you, well-not that I can see you-so soon.

"Nobody ever does." Death patted the cat on the head.

"So, how soon do we leave? Or do I get to pull the "nine-lives" trump card?"

"It's not my decision." Death yawned.

"Who decides then?" The cat asked.

"That." Death pointed in the darkness, but of course the cat didn't see a thing.

"What?" The cat felt around inside the box.

"It's a radioactive particle." Death explained.

"I don't get it." The cat, who hadn't studied physics and had never heard of Schrödinger's cat, was mystified.

"If the particle decays, you die." Death said. "But there's a catch."

"Fish, I hope." The cat tried some more cat humor.

"I got that." Death tried to chuckle; but of course, it came out monotone. "The particle can't decay and you can't die unless someone observes it." Death continued. "It's a "reality collapsing of the universe thing" invented by "You Know Who".


Meanwhile.

The professor adjusted an IV bag with a long tube that disappeared inside a hole drilled into the side of a wooden box. The box was on a long metal table resting on a chipped linoleum floor that spanned a cave-like room, which was, of course, the mad professor's lab. And in keeping with the madness theme, Professor Gottlieb had furnished the room with boiling beakers, whizzing gizmos, formaldehyde containers of body parts, chains and pulleys with platforms that rose to the ceiling, spidery cobwebs, scurrying rats, and a sidekick named Ego.

"I don't get it." Ego, permanently hunched into a position of subservience, limped to the table and looked up at Professor Gottlieb with his one good eye.

"Of course, you don't, Ego, you poor wretched creature." The professor's eyes glowed as steel in a blast furnace. "I, Professor Fillmore Gottlieb, will prove once and for all that quantum theorists are as crazy as-as crazy as-"

"You are?" Ego folded his hands and smiled up at the master.

"That's what they all say, isn't it? That I'm crazy. Well, you won't hear me spouting nonsense about multiple universes dancing on the head of a pin. You won't hear me ranting about reality bending and collapsing only when it is looked at.

"Well, I see what you mean." Ego chased a bug and stuck it in his mouth. "But, I mean, isn't that sort of like the tree falling in the forest thing?"

"Of course not, totally different." Professor Gottlieb poured a drink from a whiskey decanter. The liquid sloshed in his shaking hands.

"Pardon me for speaking, master." Ego grabbed another bug. "But isn't the universe by its very nature observer-dependent? Sort of an "I exist, therefore I am" conundrum, as it were. How can we know we exist if nobody confirms it?"

"Must you keep mouthing that gibberish?" Professor Gottlieb took a drink from the glass. "Poor Ego, how can I explain the workings of the universe to your poor, simple and childish mind?"

"I spoke out of turn; forgive me, master." Ego limped over to a corner and sat down to eat his bowl of gruel. The bugs had given him an appetite.

"Observe and learn, Ego." Professor Gottlieb pointed at the box. "Inside are a cat and a radioactive particle. There is a fifty-fifty probability that the particle will decay and if the particle decays, the cat will die-correct?"

"Not according to quantum physics," Ego said dripping gruel from his mouth, "the cat can't die, the particle can't collapse, unless someone observes it. The cat is half-dead and half-alive until you open the box."

"Idiot!" Professor Gottlieb threw the glass at Ego. "The cat will die and the particle will decay or not decay whether I open the box or not. The cat is either alive or dead." The professor poured another drink.


Meanwhile.

"Is that true?" The cat, who had heard all, asked death.

"All true, I'm afraid." Death tapped a shoe. "Meanwhile, my appointments are backing up in a most untidy fashion. You wouldn't believe the schedule I have to keep. I'm already four thousand, three hundred and eighty five souls behind. And "You Know Who" is a stickler about overtime. Hate's it."

"Which part?" The cat, who could only hold onto a single thought at a time, continued, "that I'm half-dead or half-alive or a falling tree won't make a sound unless somebody's there?"

"All of it." Death tapped his shoe some more. "I really hate being kept waiting."

Meanwhile.

"But how will you know if you're right or wrong?" Ego limped over and rubbed the master's sleeve.

"That is my genius, Ego, my man." Professor Gottlieb rubbed his hands together and laughed a diabolical laugh. "I don't plan to open the box for years."

"But the cat will starve to death." Ego eyed the box.

"Wrong, again, Ego." Professor Gottlieb fondled a bag attached to the tube. "The cat will be fed by this tube until he either dies by the particle or from natural causes. When I open the box, I expect to find nothing but bones, therefore proving that the cat has died and the particle has collapsed, observed or not."

Years later.

Professor Gottlieb leaned against his cane and adjusted his false teeth so that the clicking sound wasn't so loud. "Confound it, Ego! Where did you disappear to?"

"Sorry, Master, but my lumbago is at it again, and my rheumatism is acting up today." Ego, even more limping and hunched than before, looked up at the Professor through glass-bottle thick lenses that covered his one good eye.

"Today's the day, Ego." The professor ran a hand through his thin white hair capturing several loose tufts.

"Is it Wednesday again, Master?" Ego looked confused. "Seems like only yesterday it was Wednesday."

"It was Wednesday yesterday, you idiot." Professor Gottlieb walked over to the box. "No, Ego, today is the day I go down in history. Today, we open the box."

"What box?" Ego scratched his head.

"The cat box, you moron." Professor Gottlieb puffed out his chest. There was the sound of chalk as a rib cracked.

"Do we have a cat?" Ego looked around; but with eyesight failing, he could see nothing beyond his own grubby hands.

"Tah Dum!" Professor Gottlieb opened the box.

Now, here is the way things happened. The world proceeded to spin as a vortex inside a kaleidoscope might be inclined to do. It morphed and formed a spiral whirling into the fathomless blackness of space. If Death had owned a surfboard at that moment, it would have been declared a Kahuna as it rode the waves of probabilities that collapsed along the great highway of the universe. Finally, reality settled like a pinball at the bottom of a spiral.

And death-what happened after all the waiting, foot tapping, and sighing? Death got exactly what it had come for. Professor Fillmore Gottlieb.

The cat observed and ran away.


:mix: :mix: :mix: :mix: :artist: :mix: :mix: :mix: :mix: :worried:
 
Last edited:
what you want is to know how much you are 'pressing' every time you do a pushup? Get into position with your hands on your bathroom scaleinstead of the floor.
 
ChefWide said:
what you want is to know how much you are 'pressing' every time you do a pushup? Get into position with your hands on your bathroom scaleinstead of the floor.

smartest answer of all... (except for the fact that the scale will fluctuate)

seriously - the smartest dude here....
 
Becoming said:
smartest answer of all... (except for the fact that the scale will fluctuate)

seriously - the smartest dude here....

Exactly BECOMING, now you are getting it!!! Finally intelligent life!! It is not why he is doing pushups or how much he is doing, but it is the observer or the reader who observes this post that decides who is the smartest dude here and right now it is BECOMING!!! Excellent BECOMING you are the first on this forum to get what Brotha BILL is saying!!!!

BECOMING (ZEN MASTER OF QUANTUM THEORY!!!!)

NOW YOU HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS YOU NEED! UNTIL NEXT TIME!!!!
:mix: :mix: :mix: :mix: :qt: :mix: :mix: :mix: :mix:
 
BrothaBill said:
Exactly BECOMING, now you are getting it!!! Finally intelligent life!! It is not why he is doing pushups or how much he is doing, but it is the observer or the reader who observes this post that decides who is the smartest dude here and right now it is BECOMING!!! Excellent BECOMING you are the first on this forum to get what Brotha BILL is saying!!!!

BECOMING (ZEN MASTER OF QUANTUM THEORY!!!!)

NOW YOU HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS YOU NEED! UNTIL NEXT TIME!!!!
:mix: :mix: :mix: :mix: :qt: :mix: :mix: :mix: :mix:

Dude, wtf are you talking about? LOL
 
BrothaBill-

In regards to your PM... LOL, I get it....sorry, I skipped over your posts cause I thought you were just some new looney on the board - a lot of us skip posts that are excessively long... (kind of an FYI)

PS-how is antartica this time if year?
 
Becoming said:
Dude, wtf are you talking about? LOL

HAHAHA!! QUANTUM THEORY! ALL THE ANSWERS ARE IN THIS THREAD, YOU JUST MASTERED AND YOU DIDNT EVEN KNOW IT! REREAD ALL I HAVE WRITTEN ALL THE ANSWERS TO QUANTUM THEORY IS IN THIS THREAD!! IT IS NOT THE QUESTION THAT IT IS ANSWERED THAT MATTERS BUT THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PERSON THAT READS IT AND THEN ULTIMATELY THE OBSERVER WHO RESPONDS WITH HIS INTERPRETATION THAT MATTERS. QUANTUM THEORY DICTATES THIS AND YOU JUST LEARNED THAT LESSON!
BECOMING WITHOUT KNOWING YOU WERE SMART ENOUGH TO ANSWER THE QUESTION OF THE UNIVERSE! THAT IS WHAT IM SAYING!! THE WISDOM HAS BEEN WITHIN YOU THE WHOLE TIME!!

BECOMING (ZEN MASTER!!!) :rainbow: :rainbow: :rainbow:
 
Becoming said:
BrothaBill-

In regards to your PM... LOL, I get it....sorry, I skipped over your posts cause I thought you were just some new looney on the board - a lot of us skip posts that are excessively long... (kind of an FYI)

PS-how is antartica this time if year?


HAHAHAHA!! You tell me how Antartica is, afterall you created it!! hahaha!! See how fun quantum theory can be LOL!!! Yeah I guess it takes some time to understand what I was saying and most wouldnt read it, but they should if they want to increase their intelligence incredibly!! Thanks youre the first to get it on this board!!

Thanks again Becoming (ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT!) :evil: :evil:

PS... I've been here all the time my last handle was Luciasbrown but got locked out b/c I hadnt used it because I was too busy travelling the universe on an electron beam! hahahaha!!! so not some NEW looney hahaha! or am I???? :verygood: :verygood: :verygood: :verygood:
 
Last edited:
BrothaBill said:
IT IS NOT THE QUESTION THAT IT IS ANSWERED THAT MATTERS BUT THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PERSON THAT READS IT AND THEN ULTIMATELY THE OBSERVER WHO RESPONDS WITH HIS INTERPRETATION THAT MATTERS. QUANTUM THEORY DICTATES THIS AND YOU JUST LEARNED THAT LESSON!

Dude I think you are talking about that physics experiment (scheindinger's cat? or something) where they could show that matter could potentially be in two place at once or something.... but the reason you can find that answer is because the fact that what you are "observing" the event with (which was an electron I think in this case) determines what you will see.....

I have worked in science dude, everything you observe is subject to considerations based on WHAT you are observing it with.... and it is not just in quantum physics...

take your vision for example... how do you know that everything you see is seen the same by everyone else... what if by chance your brain is wired so that what I see is red you see as green and vice versa (it interprets it differently)? we would never know because we have only one perspective from which to make observations, and yes the obsevation and interpretation by each individual is the key event...

PS- are you on psychoactive drugs dude, or are you always like this?
 
Becoming said:
Dude I think you are talking about that physics experiment (scheindinger's cat? or something) where they could show that matter could potentially be in two place at once or something.... but the reason you can find that answer is because the fact that what you are "observing" the event with (which was an electron I think in this case) determines what you will see.....

I have worked in science dude, everything you observe is subject to considerations based on WHAT you are observing it with.... and it is not just in quantum physics...

take your vision for example... how do you know that everything you see is seen the same by everyone else... what if by chance your brain is wired so that what I see is red you see as green and vice versa (it interprets it differently)? we would never know because we have only one perspective from which to make observations, and yes the obsevation and interpretation by each individual is the key event...

PS- are you on psychoactive drugs dude, or are you always like this?

Exactly that is what Im saying: What is the reality for a colorblind person? I dont know what is seen be anyone else b/c it doesnt matter, it is whatever I believe I think they believe and vice-versa. That is the answer to it all, that in one space I am the creator and my interpretation is all that matters and the next truth is the person that is being observed and his reality is all that matters. Both true and seemingly opposite, but in reality both part of a dualistic model expanded upon by Cartesian Logic. THat is what we were talking about Cartesian Interactive dualism, actually he got it fairly quickly I think, I dont know, he never told me. You see that is what Im saying. You were the first one to tell you got it so that must be the only criteria used. It all takes that one theory should include all answers for it to be true and then must be flexible enough to allow for future thoughts, that is what Im saying or what you are saying hahahaha!! You see logic dictates that you are in fact talking to yourself, but in one of an infinite number of realities that is dictated by logic.

And to answer your questions no, Im not on P.. drugs and yes Im like this all the time and a documented genius, do you believe me?? That is the only answer you need to know b/c it is all what you believe!! See, its that simple!!!! :artist: :artist: :artist: :artist:
 
Becoming said:
Dude I think you are talking about that physics experiment (scheindinger's cat? or something) where they could show that matter could potentially be in two place at once or something.... but the reason you can find that answer is because the fact that what you are "observing" the event with (which was an electron I think in this case) determines what you will see.....

I have worked in science dude, everything you observe is subject to considerations based on WHAT you are observing it with.... and it is not just in quantum physics...

take your vision for example... how do you know that everything you see is seen the same by everyone else... what if by chance your brain is wired so that what I see is red you see as green and vice versa (it interprets it differently)? we would never know because we have only one perspective from which to make observations, and yes the obsevation and interpretation by each individual is the key event...

PS- are you on psychoactive drugs dude, or are you always like this?

Schroedingres cat is a hypothetical mental excercise. Nobody ever put a cat inside a cage with a radioactive isotope.
 
Fonz said:
Schroedingres cat is a hypothetical mental excercise. Nobody ever put a cat inside a cage with a radioactive isotope.

Exactly, Fonz gets it!@! But how do you know nobody ever put a cat inside a cage with a radioactive isotope???

See it doesnt matter if Fonz believes they didnt, then they didnt, but what if they did??? How could you disprove we have secret labs going on all the time, its just not observed in reality, but who knows? That is what Im saying!!!

FONZ (ANOTHER ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT) :rainbow: :rainbow:
 
BrothaBill said:
It all takes that one theory should include all answers for it to be true and then must be flexible enough to allow for future thoughts, that is what Im saying or what you are saying hahahaha!! You see logic dictates that you are in fact talking to yourself, but in one of an infinite number of realities that is dictated by logic.

...Im like this all the time and a documented genius, do you believe me?? That is the only answer you need to know b/c it is all what you believe!! See, its that simple!!!! :artist: :artist: :artist: :artist:

cartesian logic - interesting stuff... so are you more into physics or philosophy, or both? all things as you say do converge at some point...

yes it is true, I may be talking to myself and infact may have invented you and everything else as a device of my consciousness to entertain me, I thought of that one back in the day at the ripe age of 18, however you can never prove it either way/right or wrong and thus it is only thoery and philosophy and will never become science....

and also yes the only answer you need to know is one b/c it is all what you believe is true too, because what you believe is reality (regardless of whether you are divergent or not)

which brings me to my next point... genius breeds insanity... I rack up quite a few points on the IQ scale myself... but what does genius really buy you?
 
chaos mage said:
observer affects the observed reality


Exactly!!! More intelligent life, Ive struck a goldmine here!! Yes that is exactly what Im saying, you can never observe the truth based on quantum theory, just the probability of where it was. The act of observing it changes it!!! Its just that simple!! Awesome!! :rainbow: :rainbow:

MAGE CHAOS (ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT!! NO LONGER A SEEKER OF LIGHT!!)
 
BrothaBill said:
Exactly!!! More intelligent life, Ive struck a goldmine here!! Yes that is exactly what Im saying, you can never observe the truth based on quantum theory, just the probability of where it was. The act of observing it changes it!!! Its just that simple!! Awesome!! :rainbow: :rainbow:

MAGE CHAOS (ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT!! NO LONGER A SEEKER OF LIGHT!!)

wow brothabill.....you are so hot to me right now
 
Becoming said:
cartesian logic - interesting stuff... so are you more into physics or philosophy, or both? all things as you say do converge at some point...

yes it is true, I may be talking to myself and infact may have invented you and everything else as a device of my consciousness to entertain me, I thought of that one back in the day at the ripe age of 18, however you can never prove it either way/right or wrong and thus it is only thoery and philosophy and will never become science....

and also yes the only answer you need to know is one b/c it is all what you believe is true too, because what you believe is reality (regardless of whether you are divergent or not)

which brings me to my next point... genius breeds insanity... I rack up quite a few points on the IQ scale myself... but what does genius really buy you?

Exactly, that is what Im saying and at some point everyone thinks it at some point, see the answer is within you, always has been, infinite thoughts all must be true for a theory to be correct. That is what Im saying and what does it buy me?? The ability to move between wave and particle worlds, I have figured out a way using Physics, changed the rules... I SPEAK THE TRUTh... I have found a way... Believe if you want or dont believe me it doesnt matter... that is what Im saying. But I have... YOU see everything you believe has been what someone has told you, your reality is based on that.. WHat I am saying is this is just another lesson and "I" just another professor and this is reality. You see if you believe it, then it is true... its that simple, that is what I am saying. I am light and a zen master and I have alot of knowledge and I can do some Freaky shite... I kid you not.

BrothaBill (Zen master of the Light) :verygood:
 
BrothaBill said:
Exactly, Fonz gets it!@! But how do you know nobody ever put a cat inside a cage with a radioactive isotope???

See it doesnt matter if Fonz believes they didnt, then they didnt, but what if they did??? How could you disprove we have secret labs going on all the time, its just not observed in reality, but who knows? That is what Im saying!!!

FONZ (ANOTHER ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT) :rainbow: :rainbow:

LOL...the theory held that once the radioactive isotope began to decay the cat would be both dead and alive at the same time. Just a concept of Quantum Mechanics(simple).

We now know that it is impossible to measure any object precisely(say with precision (deltaX)), and attempt a simultaneous momentum measurement made under precision(delta(p)), then the product of these 2 uncertainties cannot be smaller than the number of the order of h(Planck's constant)

(delta(X)) * (delta(p)) => h (Plancks constant)

This is referred to as Schroedingers' Uncertainty Principle.

To give you a reference point of the smallest possible source of error, just set the left side equal to the right side, so:

Smallest error

= h = 6.634 * 10 exp (-26) or 0.00000000000000000000000006634

Of course errors such as this almost never happen, they are much larger.

If by some miracle we would be able to construct a device that could measure the error below the (h) tolerance gradient, we would be able to actually measure the electron orbits in the electron cloud to a precision that is unheard off.

Some of my professors are working in this field. Quantum Chrmodynamics and Quantum Electrodynamics.
 
chaos mage said:
Wasn't there an experiment done demonstrating how the behavior of a beam of electrons changed when people "watched" it?
Yes, YEs, that is the beginning of your journey... Its that simple>>>

Yes, but it doesnt have to be done in a Lab, you can do it at home. Heres how...

Turn off your lights in your house and then stare and a static TV and soon your mind will see patterns and then you can influence what you see on the screen with thought and see what you want when you get relaxed enough and let tension go... YOU see...

You are changing electrons by staring at the TV screen b/c vision is just a reflection of light bounced off what you are looking at... IN this case, the electrons flowing on the screen.... FUcking awesome my man, Ive done this early on in my research... That by thought you are actually influencing those electrons, you see VISION is a two way street...

BrothaBIll (ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT) :verygood: :verygood:
 
tripleblonde said:
wow brothabill.....you are so hot to me right now

Most Excellent Triple Blonde, that is the only answer that is important to BrothaBill!!! hahaha!!! Excellent now you get it too!!

Tripleblonde (truly a ZEN MASTER OF LIGHT AND...BEAUTY!) :verygood:
 
Fonz said:
LOL...the theory held that once the radioactive isotope began to decay the cat would be both dead and alive at the same time. Just a concept of Quantum Mechanics(simple).

We now know that it is impossible to measure any object precisely(say with precision (deltaX)), and attempt a simultaneous momentum measurement made under precision(delta(p)), then the product of these 2 uncertainties cannot be smaller than the number of the order of h(Planck's constant)

(delta(X)) * (delta(p)) => h (Plancks constant)

This is referred to as Schroedingers' Uncertainty Principle.

To give you a reference point of the smallest possible source of error, just set the left side equal to the right side, so:

Smallest error

= h = 6.634 * 10 exp (-26) or 0.00000000000000000000000006634

Of course errors such as this almost never happen, they are much larger.

If by some miracle we would be able to construct a device that could measure the error below the (h) tolerance gradient, we would be able to actually measure the electron orbits in the electron cloud to a precision that is unheard off.

Some of my professors are working in this field. Quantum Chrmodynamics and Quantum Electrodynamics.

aCADEMIC mASTURBATION... Sorry to say, I ve already done it and more.. Created magentic fields with thought. WEll past all known knowledge... Believe me, I came from a different reality and jumped into this one. Ill be leaving shortly..
 
I'll get my brother online, he's doing his Ph.D in Super-string theories, and Supergravity theories. Basically UFT's.
 
Fonz said:
Schroedingres cat is a hypothetical mental excercise. Nobody ever put a cat inside a cage with a radioactive isotope.

sorry, I misquoted... I read an article about an experiment based on the hypothetical of schoredingre's cat where they theorized teleporting single particles (I don't remember what kind) was possible, but really it was just a manifestation of the observation criteria or somethig like that...

it was quite a few years ago I read that...
 
Fonz said:
We now know that it is impossible to measure any object precisely....QUOTE]

word on that post bro- sounds like the alley they were going down... but I am not a physics guy so I am not going to pretend to be...

good posts tho...
 
Fonz said:
I'll get my brother online, he's doing his Ph.D in Super-string theories, and Supergravity theories. Basically UFT's.

Cool, cool, I have some time before I make my next jump, it'll be good to talk to someone, but Ive moved past alot of simple p hysics questions, much like the original question, the conundrum I spoke of is that only a person who knows physics can answer it, but it would be too elementary for that person to answer it. So if he asked specific questions my most accurate response must be increasingly vague. Thats what Im saying
:rainbow: :rainbow: :rainbow:
 
Becoming said:
Fonz said:
We now know that it is impossible to measure any object precisely....QUOTE]

word on that post bro- sounds like the alley they were going down... but I am not a physics guy so I am not going to pretend to be...

good posts tho...

Exactly... What Im doing for all of you is a teaching a thought exercise and IN fact changing reality by teaching you. You see its that simple. I have the ability to manipulate reality and so do you, just by thought and you observing it... BUt that is just the beginning my friends of Light... I have moved well past this and continued to change the current laws of physics with thought. I kid you not!! :evil: :evil: :evil:
 
BrothaBill said:
Turn off your lights in your house and then stare and a static TV and soon your mind will see patterns and then you can influence what you see on the screen with thought and see what you want when you get relaxed enough and let tension go... YOU see...

You are changing electrons by staring at the TV screen b/c vision is just a reflection of light bounced off what you are looking at... IN this case, the electrons flowing on the screen.... FUcking awesome my man, Ive done this early on in my research... That by thought you are actually influencing those electrons, you see VISION is a two way street...

cool stuff bro - yep, I have those same theories- to extrapolate even farther, once you pull that off, you can reach into a picture of a coke and pull it out and drink it if you believe... or you can run through a brick wall if you really believe it... yep, thought all that same stuff... very matrix-y (perhaps why I like the movie so much)

of course if you can pull it off, you also perhaps become permanently mentally divergent which is the scary (or perhaps liberating and awesome) part...

dude could you somehow get me a couple extra grand, cause I could use it for a rainy day and so far being hella smart hasn't done shit for me.... LOL
 
BrothaBill said:
Yes, YEs, that is the beginning of your journey... Its that simple>>>

Yes, but it doesnt have to be done in a Lab, you can do it at home. Heres how...

Turn off your lights in your house and then stare and a static TV and soon your mind will see patterns and then you can influence what you see on the screen with thought and see what you want when you get relaxed enough and let tension go... YOU see...

You are changing electrons by staring at the TV screen b/c vision is just a reflection of light bounced off what you are looking at... IN this case, the electrons flowing on the screen.... FUcking awesome my man, Ive done this early on in my research... That by thought you are actually influencing those electrons, you see VISION is a two way street...

BrothaBIll (ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT) :verygood: :verygood:


Yeah bb, I have done this when I was younger, never really understood it. I also have seen waveforms around my head when staring and looking in the mirror... auras and shit... cool stuff
 
Exactly, becoming that is what Im saying, the answer is within you... ANd that movie was based on me, well not in this reality, but it was based on me and I can do all of that stuff in this reality and I can teach stuff worth alot more than a couple of extra grand... That is what Ive been saying all along. BUt I have to rest for awhile I have a most excellent experiment to do tonight... Im curious shhhh... Ive said too much already... Most excellent goldmine.... seee how much knowledge and itelligence this thread has give all of you.. That is how I amplify my power, by resonating my thoughts. That is how I'll continue my journey.. Ta ta for now!!
 
chaos mage said:
Yeah bb, I have done this when I was younger, never really understood it. I also have seen waveforms around my head when staring and looking in the mirror... auras and shit... cool stuff

Yes, that is what im saying... that all that is real, your mind has the ability to change reality with thought... in essence moving the electrons that you see. With lsd or similar... it allows you to move electrons with thought and change reality and actual physical particles. Hallucinations or whatever variablistic name you give it and whatever meaning you give to... they are in fact real... and you are able to move the electrons around you with thought.

That is what Im saying, but this is just the tip of the iceberg... Im telling the truth on all of this... I am not joking... believe me :rainbow:
:qt: :qt: :qt: :qt: :qt:
 
Beachbum1546 said:
i think brothabill wants all the zen masters to drink some punch with him later.

If thats what you believe then that must be the truth. At least in YOUR reality, but not in mine. I have no reason to harm anyone, at least that is my interpretation of your statement, but if they want to drink punch with me and they take a reality leap with me, then I dont care, it doesnt matter. You see all of this is just a leap of faith! :verygood: :verygood:
 
wtlftr said:
BB has a wierd sense of awareness and answers questions with questions. IMHO

Yes, yes exactly, that is what Im doing. Just a mental exercise and yes I am more self aware than any variable (human) that has ever been born in this reality. Im unlocking all the answers that have been inside you all of the time. You will have many more questions that this will raise and then you will answer them and become smarter than any other person in your reality b/c you will be asking questions that no one has had the information yet to ask... You see its that simple. Changing reality with a single thought. That is what I am teaching all of you

BrothaBill (ZEN MASTER OF LIGHT!) :heart: :heart: :heart:
 
chaos mage said:
You differentiate between the particle and the wave world... yet aren't they the same, just different expressions of energy?

Yes you are correct, that is interactive dualism. I have developed a way to separate the two... In a different reality, I synthesized a chemical yet to be named that allowed me to separate the two and master the wave world... That is what Im saying. Its a similar concept of Ketamine and an out of body experience. Only I can jump at will and make reality influences with thought. I have gone WAY beyond that elementary stuff..
 
Brothabill- your theories are cool and as I said I have many of the same...

but, the TV static one is a bad example as it is more an optical illusion based on how your brain tries to interpret the non-patterned field... something about inhibition between ajoining neurons with similar orientational functions (I did neurobio in undergrad, but I could not find any articles on it)... basically you brain is trying to organize the random patterns from your retinas into something you can recognize... it is basically an induced hallucination...

auditory hallucinations are the most prevalent... in a similar setup- ever in the shower and think you hear something/someone? the static sound field produced creates like a white noise which your brain tries to interpret and instead it "adds in a couple things" to make it more managable....

but keep in mind a hallucination is only a percieved reality - to prove it happened and that you changed reality you would have to record it.... try videotaping (with a camera pointed at the screen and not a recorder) the screen of the tv when you are doing the static experiment - now that would be something to work with....

that said, I am at least intersted to hear about your experiments tomorrow... if in altering reality you can throw me some extra cash, or maybe a 91-93 5.0 mustang GT, I would appreciate, as I am not that advanced to actually pull it off and only know the theory behind all this...

and I drank lots of punch back in the day as well.... LOL... it only tells you things you already know...
 
wtlftr said:
I have a question BB...oops nevermind.. I looked into my internal ZEN and answered myself.

Yes, see its that simple. The answer is withing all of you.. always has been. you see... Ive never lied to any of you. All I am saying it real. :supercool
 
wtlftr said:
Are you using Ketamine currently? :worried:

No Ive never tried it, but I have a friend that does that stuff, but I never screw with illegal stuff. The stuff Ive synthesized is legal b/c no one knows what it is, so they can prove that it exists and therefore cannot declare it illegal. You see that is what I am saying
 
wtlftr said:
I have a question BB...oops nevermind.. I looked into my internal ZEN and answered myself.

LOL wtlftr you are a funny dude..
 
Becoming said:
Brothabill- your theories are cool and as I said I have many of the same...

but, the TV static one is a bad example as it is more an optical illusion based on how your brain tries to interpret the non-patterned field... something about inhibition between ajoining neurons with similar orientational functions (I did neurobio in undergrad, but I could not find any articles on it)... basically you brain is trying to organize the random patterns from your retinas into something you can recognize... it is basically an induced hallucination...

auditory hallucinations are the most prevalent... in a similar setup- ever in the shower and think you hear something/someone? the static sound field produced creates like a white noise which your brain tries to interpret and instead it "adds in a couple things" to make it more managable....

but keep in mind a hallucination is only a percieved reality - to prove it happened and that you changed reality you would have to record it.... try videotaping (with a camera pointed at the screen and not a recorder) the screen of the tv when you are doing the static experiment - now that would be something to work with....

that said, I am at least intersted to hear about your experiments tomorrow... if in altering reality you can throw me some extra cash, or maybe a 91-93 5.0 mustang GT, I would appreciate, as I am not that advanced to actually pull it off and only know the theory behind all this...

and I drank lots of punch back in the day as well.... LOL... it only tells you things you already know...

Hahaha!!! Its only perceived if you believe that... Reread all the posts and if you added a video camera it would only record static b/c it lacks the ability that YOU think to have thought. BUt in fact it has its own frequency that doesnt fluctuate. You'll see it... Everything has its own specific frequency and it will record that... What you will see is a static screen on video with a superimpose reflection of the frequency of the observer(in this case, the camera)... You'll see vertical or horizontal lines moving in the same direction and it is like a frequency fingerprint, but you see by observing it you are also influencing and superimposing youre own frequency and pretty soon the pattern will change as you stare at it longer.. That is interactive dualism and I have proved it is REAL!!! :rainbow: :rainbow: :rainbow:
 
BB, what are the ingrediants of your home brew? PM me so I can make myself a genius QUIA CHAIN CANE potion. I just learned how to walk over rice paper without leaving a chase. This is some good shiat.
 
chaos mage said:
How far can you get without chemical assistance? omega pleateau?
Omega Plateau was where I ended up thats Why I called it that. The end and touched the face of God and now Im going in reverse. How far you go without CA is based on you and your intelligence. IN can take a life time or never or matter of moments... I do not know the answer to your question, but the answer IS within you... SO only you can answer that... :heart:
 
BB..Start your own thread an label it the answer is within. I am sure the math question has been answered and we are pirating this thread.
 
wtlftr said:
BB, what are the ingrediants of your home brew? PM me so I can make myself a genius QUIA CHAIN CANE potion. I just learned how to walk over rice paper without leaving a chase. This is some good shiat.

Well, Im not quite sure you could understand how to make it b/c it has to do with magnetic fields. SO you have to find your own answer, but believe me the answer is within you. You see thats why people freak on psychedilics b/c they dont understand the wisdom that they see, but now you do so let the answers come out.
 
Thanks BB, I am much more enlightened. BTW...what are the ingredients you speak of. Rmember..I am 1 SMART MOFO
 
BrothaBill said:
...but you see by observing it you are also influencing and superimposing youre own frequency and pretty soon the pattern will change as you stare at it longer.. That is interactive dualism and I have proved it is REAL!!! :rainbow: :rainbow: :rainbow:

dude- in my version to really influence and change reality, the camera would also have to observe the same alteration....

PS- I like my GT in black or that really dark blue... th :)

CM- Where is all this omega plateau info at? where are you getting this from? (link)

wtlftr- F the rice paper and start with the giant red hot casks that brand you.... the rice paper is a waste of time anyways....
 
wtlftr said:
BB..Start your own thread an label it the answer is within. I am sure the math question has been answered and we are pirating this thread.


I already tried that... I labeled it "Ive figured out the secret of the Universe" but no one believed me... so I had to start with vague answers and as peoples intelligence increase so did the accuracy of my answers and thereby instilling in them My thoughts of Quantum theory...

SO as you can see all of the answers have been here all the time... just had to BELIEVE!!! :rainbow: :rainbow: :rainbow: :rainbow:
 
BrothaBill said:
I already tried that... I labeled it "Ive figured out the secret of the Universe" but no one believed me...

bump it...
 
Becoming said:
CM- Where is all this omega plateau info at? where are you getting this from? (link)

psychadelic drug trips ranked by plateaus and how spiritual they are.... "omega plateau" is what BB called his touching the face of God. really don't have a link, but probably easy search in erowid.com
 
chaos mage said:
cool... I would invite you over, but I don't think tonight is the best night LOL


No problem, Im in Porland, perhaps next week. I have the money to travel, just got a free trip to hawaii. Ill have to tell you about it sometime... Its heelarious.. I can show you some tripp shite and SHOW you what Im talking about so that you can OBSERVE the truth I speak, thereby making it True!!!!!!! :verygood: :verygood: :verygood:
 
Many people enjoy the big branding technique, not me. I like the tattooing slow and painful, I mean the branding is over too quickly, give me some pain.
 
BrothaBill said:
No problem, Im in Porland, perhaps next week. I have the money to travel, just got a free trip to hawaii. Ill have to tell you about it sometime... Its heelarious.. I can show you some tripp shite and SHOW you what Im talking about so that you can OBSERVE the truth I speak, thereby making it True!!!!!!! :verygood: :verygood: :verygood:



But if Im succesful in my experiment tonight I wont need to BUY a ticket... We shall see how this turns out... I just got bought a trampoline and am preparing for my experiment... THINK ABOUT PHYSICS AND HOW INERTIA CAN MAKE THINGS FLY AND THAT IS YOUR ANSWER AND WE CAN MEET IN THE SKIES THIS WEEKEND!!!!! JUST BELIEVE MY MAN AND ZEN BROTHA!!!
 
BrothaBill said:
No Problem!! Tonight Im learning how to fly.. I am not joking that is my experiment...

bro - did you ever live in chicago at a health foods joint? I had a friend that was working on similar stuff and birds used to follow him down the street...
 
wtlftr said:
BB is about to try to prove or break NEWTONS law of motion.

Tonight I will PROVE IT!!!! I will prove its true and break current INTERPRETATION of it. That is what I WILL DO tonight!! YOu see YOU MSUT think outside the box.. Thats where I live hahaha... WHo let BrothaBILL outside of the Box...

The answer you seek is...

I DID all with a single thought!!! :artist: :artist: :artist:
 
Top Bottom