Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

End Of Morpheus?

it doesnt add up to $20.00. I can make a cd persoanlly for about 40cents. That includes all the overhead- ink, cd case, cd electric.. A large company with their volume can do it for much less.

You know that there is alot of price gouging going on when there is big price differences between different stores. Bestbuy had the NYC Underground for sale for $12.00 while Sam Goody was selling it for $17.00. why the $5.00 difference? Let the record companies rot in hell.
 
Crazier said:


Well, he and the rest of the artist's can suck my big balls.

If they didn't make a CD with 1 good song, and 11 shitty songs, I wouldn't have to pirate the music.

Worst case scenario... charge a small fee per month... or charge for a very small fee for each download... and pay the artists with that money generated.

They cry because the days of charging $15 a CD has come to end.

Fuck 'em all I say.
--

amen brother!
 
VicTusDeuS said:
it doesnt add up to $20.00. I can make a cd persoanlly for about 40cents. That includes all the overhead- ink, cd case, cd electric.. A large company with their volume can do it for much less.

You know that there is alot of price gouging going on when there is big price differences between different stores. Bestbuy had the NYC Underground for sale for $12.00 while Sam Goody was selling it for $17.00. why the $5.00 difference? Let the record companies rot in hell.

:mad: just what i thought!
 
I ran a record store for eight years. Here's how it works ... and sadly, it does add up to $20. For the labels to cry about file sharing is a sham. If anything, it's been helpful. They did the same thing with used CDs, but we found that many customers shop used to intrduce themselves to artists they might not otherwise buy, among other reasons. They then come back to buy other titles new. The same thing is happening with file sharing. Just don't get angry at independent retailers ... 1% net (ie. $0.16 to $0.19 profit after all expenses) from the sale of every CD is considered extremely profitable.

Yes, the cost of manufacturing the item is relatively low. But there are tons of other costs beyond simply burning the disc and putting it in a jewel case. I'm not saying the costs are all justifiable, but they are costs nonetheless. And remember, each hand in the pie has a cost associated with conducting its business.


  • Average cost of goods for a frontline CD: $13 (this is what the store pays the distributor ... the store's gross profit is derived from subtracting the cost of goods from their shelf price, so Best Buy sometimes loses money on some CDs. Oh, and get this ... every major label enforces a minimum advertised price at which the stores can sell the CD, thereby making the retailer look like the bad guy when it has to raise prices to make a decent profit. Don't forget, there's a cost of running a store, too, so it's monumentally harder for independent stores to compete with Best Buy and other big boxes. The big boxes can ignore the MAPs and charge whatever they want for CDs because they also sell VERY high profit TVs and appliances and electronics. Indy stores that sell used CDs do so to keep the prices for new CDs competitive with Best Butt et al. Mall rents, btw, are exorbitant. Hence the full list price at mall stores.).
  • Artists share: $0.14 (yes, that's cents) to $2 per disc shipped (depends on the artist, but the bigger the artist the bigger the share -- assuming their deal wasn't front end, like Janet Jackson's and REMs. Even then, some of those deals are against future royalties and could have to pay back the difference once the contract expires.)
  • Distributor's share: About $2 to $3 (and here's the kicker ... major label distributors are owned by the major labels!)
  • Label Share: The rest ... and this is where expense comes in. About 1% of the industry is funding the other 99%. For every Celine Dion (a multi-million record selling artist) there are hundreds of artists signed to labels that never become profitable. Seems like a fucked up business model, but we consumers like variety. So, thanks to Celine Dion, every little band out there you like on a Sony Music Entertainment-affiliated label can get signed, record a CD (studio time and producers/engineers/mixers/musicians cost money, too), and have a marketing budget (covering everything from magazine/radio ads to tour support to maybe a video or two). The labels also provide field support reps who visit stores to build intertest with employees, radio support reps(same deal, but at radio), cover some promotional travel expenses for artists, and some of the tour expenses. And then there are the aforementioned manufacturing costs ... production, printing, packaging and so on. Also, many of these costs are charged back to the artist ... they are in the hole to the label BEFORE the CD ever hits the shelf.
 
and how much do these music stars make of advertising and product endorsements.....more than their music. oh i can see the grammies were doing so badly, giving out $13,000 goodie bags to celebs who participated
 
Trance said:
The Grammy president, or whoever the hell he was - one of the bigwigs, got up and gave a very intense little overblown speech about how anyone who 'pirates' music over the Net is stealing from the artists Apparently the music industry is on the verge of collapse, but damn, you wouldn't know it from all those 20, 000 dollar outfits!

Then he smacked everyone on the hand with a ruler and said, "Bad!! Bad Net-thief! Bad!!"

And I hung my head in shame.

A true recording industry politician at work . . . now if he would have added the true part of that speech about just how many artist actually see any of the royalties after exspenses.
 
Times are changing but it's still the same ol story...just different technology to do it.

I can bet almost everyone here use to copy songs off the radio to a tape cassete....now we can burn songs, and get mp3's, whatever...where there's a will there's always a way.
 
THEY'RE JUST BITCHING FOR THE SAKE OF BITCHING. THE FUCKING MUSIC INDUSTRY IS STRONGER THAN EVER IMO. HOW MANY FUCKING ALBUMS CAME OUT THIS YEARS AND WENT PLATINUM. SHIT, LINKIN PARK HAS BEEN ON THE CHART 70 WEEKS AND STILL SELLING STRONG. FUCKING NSYNC AND BACKSTREET BOYS EACH SOLD AROUND 2 MILLION IN THE FIRST DAMN WEEK.

THESE RECORD COMPANIES ARE FUCKING GREEDY MOFOS AND THAT IS THE ONLY ISSUE AT HAND. INSTEAD OF MAKING 50 BILLION, THEY WANT TO MAKE 55 BILLION. FUCKING GREEDY BASTARDS.


KAYNE
 
Trance said:
The Grammy president, or whoever the hell he was - one of the bigwigs, got up and gave a very intense little overblown speech about how anyone who 'pirates' music over the Net is stealing from the artists ...
File sharing is, primarily, stealing from the labels. Artists are, in fact, affected, but very few become successful enough to be seriously impacted by it.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom