Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
ricco561
New member
I'm not trying to be a smart ass. I guess I'm just not getting the story. It's like they left something out. I mean what was she intending to prove by replacing vitamins with candy. Was she trying to get even with Johnson and johnson or something, by making the purchasers of the vitamins angry that they got candy instead of vitamins? Clearly putting candy in the jar didn't harm the kids. It only ripped off the parents who bought them.I must be missing something. It seems her real target was the maker of the vitamins.
I'm just pushing your leg.
[
