actually, he's not really that bad...he's just bored and posting what he knows
Nobody thinks he's bad, we've always thought he was smug, though.
And not to pick nits but Java isn't posting what he
KNOWS. He's posting what he
BELIEVES. Atheism is a BELIEF system (not a religion, too informal for that) but it contains certain basic premises and precepts. Not FACTS. Facts are concrete, provable, undeniable. From a factual perspective, atheism can not be proven any more than theism can be

(see points at bottom of post for WHY).
Honestly, Java is no different than someone who relates 3/4s of their posts to Joseph Smith and Mormonism, the other who relates their posts to Jesus Christ and the Gospel, or if I were to manage to relate 3/4s of my posts to Wicca and the Gods and Goddesses I revere
The UNARGUABLE Fact is That Java Can No More DISPROVE the Existence of the G-O-D or (ANY God/dess) Than I Can PROVE Their Existence. Period. It's called the Argument from Ignorance (or evidence of absence, whichever suits you more). They're both based on inherently flawed, rhetorical logic arguments, mental masturbation, nothing more. Neither premise is valid empirical evidence
Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Evidence of absence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia