Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Deca/EQ - drug strength

Nutrient-Nut

New member
On a mg per mg basis, which drug is the strongest?

Has anyone come across this information on the net or from a book like Anabolics 2002?


NN
 
Deca will probably yield the most weight and strengh gains, if that's what you are asking...
 
Hey fellow Elite board members, I found what I was looking for this morning. The following statement by Big Cat at bodybuilding.com is what had me questioning which drug is stronger on a mg per mg basis.

Quoted by Big Cat of bodybuilding.com in his steroid profile on Equipoise. "But boldenone is stronger than Deca, mg for mg....."

This may very well be his opinion, but I disagree, b/c I've always thought that Deca was the stronger of the two and it's makes sense if you look at the doses on a comparable basis. I think that 300 mg per week of Deca is stronger than 300 mg of Equipoise. Big Cat is pretty knowledgeable on steroids and writes some really good profiles, therefore I'm not sure of the correct answer so I posted this thread for some feedback from you guys.

NN
 
Deca has a stronger binding affinity for the A/R(about 3 times higher than testosterone)and will produce more in terms of anabolism than equipoise,but as stated above also carries more sides.Personally,I'll take the milder eq and less sides,lol.
 
JKD said:
I think EQ is somewhat a waiste of money and way too overrated. IMO

hmm, I love the stuff.......quality lean mass gains, very little sides...good stuff.
 
"hmm, I love the stuff.......quality lean mass gains, very little sides...good stuff."

Have you ever done it all by itself? If yes what were your gains like? A couple of my friends have done 600mgs for 12 weeks - with vary little gains. I am not saying its worthless - its just to expensive for the results you get.
 
JKD said:
"hmm, I love the stuff.......quality lean mass gains, very little sides...good stuff."

Have you ever done it all by itself? If yes what were your gains like? A couple of my friends have done 600mgs for 12 weeks - with vary little gains. I am not saying its worthless - its just to expensive for the results you get.

I'm on it right now by itself, 400mg/week....cutting right now. I'm noticing my strength increasing, and I'm gaining size while my bodyweight is staying the same. I'm getting really good pumps too, despite being on a VERY low carb diet.
 
JG1 - glad to hear its working out for yah. I think EQ has its place in a cycle if you can afford it - but if your pinching pennies - stick with test or deca - more bang for your buck IMO. I get rapped on EQ (125$ for 1 bottle of ultragan eq100).
 
JKD said:
JG1 - glad to hear its working out for yah. I think EQ has its place in a cycle if you can afford it - but if your pinching pennies - stick with test or deca - more bang for your buck IMO. I get rapped on EQ (125$ for 1 bottle of ultragan eq100).

I like it cause it's very mild, and good for slow, quality lean mass gains. I agree, you will get more bang for your buck with test or deca. It all depends on what you are after. I like EQ cause I get 0 water retention, and don't have to use an expensive anti-e. I think EQ and Primo give pretty much the same results.
 
JG1 said:


I'm on it right now by itself, 400mg/week....cutting right now. I'm noticing my strength increasing, and I'm gaining size while my bodyweight is staying the same. I'm getting really good pumps too, despite being on a VERY low carb diet.

JG1 how many carbs. would you say you consume on the average? Is is QV?
 
WannaImpress said:


JG1 how many carbs. would you say you consume on the average? Is is QV?

On non-training days, 60g carbs in the morning.
On training days, morning carbs plus 75g dextrose post-workout.

I'm on Spectro right now, but switching over to Ganabol next week.
 
Top Bottom