Daylight Savings tonight!

[samoth]

I just now found out we set our clocks back tonight. WTF? You guys are supposed to remind me of these things.

 

[jh1]

4 realz?

 

[jh1]

I will stomp ur fucking teeth down ur throat if you are lying.

 

[samoth]

4 realz?

Yeah. I saw a thread about it on the law board and checked my calander... daylight savings ends on Sunday, 11/4. Tonight.

 

[jh1]

Yeah. I saw a thread about it on the law board and checked my calander... daylight savings ends on Sunday, 11/4. Tonight.

I remember being in the clubs when when it as this weekend.. complete awesomness.... get coked for an additional hour!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Yah!

 

[samoth]

I remember being in the clubs when when it as this weekend.. complete awesomness.... get coked for an additional hour!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Yah!

Stupid farmers making the rest of us conform every waking minute of our lives for their convenience.



:cwo:

 

[Powerbuilder333]

Thanks for the reminder.
I better email my training partner, or one of us will fuck up Sundays bench training.

 

[javaguru]

Thanks for the reminder.
I better email my training partner, or one of us will fuck up Sundays bench training.

Yeah, don't want to try and bench on national bench Monday.

 

[Mr. dB]

Extra sleep is good.

 

[mountain muscle]

If my computer doesn't change the shit on it's own fuck it.

Actually my phone changed a few days ago, As usual, the rest of you slackers suck.

 

[Powerbuilder333]

My computer changed last Sunday (last years Fall back day).
The government claims that adding a couple of weeks of DST every year will save the Country millions in energy costs. I've never understood the math behind that conclusion.
It don't matter what time the clock says it is - there's still the same amount of daylight.

 

[jh1]

Phone, Computer, Satellite TV all auto set...

Now I gota change my alarm clock, my stove, my microwave, my watch.

 

[hanselthecaretaker]

I just now found out we set our clocks back tonight. WTF? You guys are supposed to remind me of these things.

I thought they discontinued this practice. Oh well, fuck yeah an extended weekend!!

 

[nimbus]

sammy why do you post on law boards?

'the same reason you post on fitness boards' is not a credited response.

 

[Stefka]

sammy why do you post on law boards?

'the same reason you post on fitness boards' is not a credited response.

He's e-stalking me.

 

[jh1]

He's e-stalking me.

STEFKA!!!


Hey-ya! Attorney in training.

When you or someone else is being unlawfully assaulted are you not allowed to attempt to stop the attack with whatever physical force that is required, yet not excessive, to stop the attack - up to and including death if you reasonably beleive death will occur if you do take the life of the assaulter?

Possible things that could occur in an attempt to stop the attack might be things such as breaking the assaulter arm, legs, or even stomping his fucking teeth down his throat.

Legally permissible given the right circumstances or not?

 

[rnch]

had to work THIRTEEN hours last nite.....thanks, DST

 

[Stefka]

Um, the majority rule is that one should not threaten to stomp another person's fucking teeth down his or her throat.
I think threats of teeth stomping might be legal in Montana though.

STEFKA!!!


Hey-ya! Attorney in training.

When you or someone else is being unlawfully assaulted are you not allowed to attempt to stop the attack with whatever physical force that is required, yet not excessive, to stop the attack - up to and including death if you reasonably beleive death will occur if you do take the life of the assaulter?

Possible things that could occur in an attempt to stop the attack might be things such as breaking the assaulter arm, legs, or even stomping his fucking teeth down his throat.

Legally permissible given the right circumstances or not?

 

[jh1]

Um, the majority rule is that one should not threaten to stomp another person's fucking teeth down his or her throat.
I think threats of teeth stomping might be legal in Montana though.

You didn't answer my question.

 

[puddlemonkey]

You didn't answer my question.

Because she didn't have the heart to tell you you're WRONG!

 

[jh1]

Because she didn't have the heart to tell you you're WRONG!

Not wrong.

Come fuck with me and I'll show you....

 

[Stefka]

You didn't answer my question.

The threat has to be imminent.
If someone is chasing you with a machete you can stomp some teeth or threaten to stomp some teeth.
If you fear that someone might chase you with a machete a week from Tuesday, the law prefers that you go to the authorities.

 

[jh1]

The threat has to be imminent.
If someone is chasing you with a machete you can stomp some teeth or threaten to stomp some teeth.
If you fear that someone might chase you with a machete a week from Tuesday, the law prefers that you go to the authorities.

Understood.

My example and question was specific enough to cover this.

If you or someone was under an unlawfull attack and you reasonably thought that death or serious injury would occur you are allowed to defend with the use of opposing physical force, as long as it isn't excessive.

 

[Stefka]

Understood.

My example and question was specific enough to cover this.

If you or someone was under an unlawfull attack and you reasonably thought that death or serious injury would occur you are allowed to defend with the use of opposing physical force, as long as it isn't excessive.

Isn't this all about you threatening to stomp a drug dealer's teeth down his throat if he didn't stop giving your ex coke?

But to answer your question, yes.
If we're talking about the use of non-deadly force in self-defense...
"A non-aggressor is justified in using force upon another if he reasonably believes that such force is necessary to protect himself from IMMINENT use of unlawful force by the other person. The use of force must not be excessive in relation to the harm threatened."
Straight out of my crim law outline, so it must be reliable.

 

[jh1]

Isn't this all about you threatening to stomp a drug dealer's teeth down his throat if he didn't stop giving your ex coke?

But to answer your question, yes.
If we're talking about the use of non-deadly force in self-defense...
"A non-aggressor is justified in using force upon another if he reasonably believes that such force is necessary to protect himself from IMMINENT use of unlawful force by the other person. The use of force must not be excessive in relation to the harm threatened."
Straight out of my crim law outline, so it must be reliable.

It started from the threat, but Samote left me with the saying that stomping someone's teeth in wouldn't be legal under any circumstances. I disagree.

My threat was purposely contingent upon a vague action upon his part - 'endangering' my child. I understand it's skating on thin ice, but I'm okay with that.

 

[Stefka]

It started from the threat, but Samote left me with the saying that stomping someone's teeth in wouldn't be legal under any circumstances. I disagree.

My threat was purposely contingent upon a vague action upon his part - 'endangering' my child. I understand it's skating on thin ice, but I'm okay with that.

You're only supposed to fight back long enough to escape the imminent danger. So if you incapacitate the aggressor and then proceed to stomp his fucking teeth down his throat, you're probably using excessive force.

 

[jh1]

You're only supposed to fight back long enough to escape the imminent danger. So if you incapacitate the aggressor and then proceed to stomp his fucking teeth down his throat, you're probably using excessive force.

Your assuming the face stomping wasn't the incapacitating blow...

 

[Smurfy]

Phone, Computer, Satellite TV all auto set...

Now I gota change my alarm clock, my stove, my microwave, my watch.

thanks for the update
let us know how that goes
praying it all comes out ok

 

[Stefka]

Your assuming the face stomping wasn't the incapacitating blow...

If the teeth smashing blow is the first incapacitating blow, then you're golden.

 

[samoth]

sammy why do you post on law boards?

'the same reason you post on fitness boards' is not a credited response.

I don't post there. I just read it.

They're a split college/grad/law admissions discussion forum. I used to read it for college topics, then eventually found the law board to be full of drama and interesting topics as the most popular board on the site. Moreover, I am e-stalking Stefka.

 

[katdav]

Yeah, but what if it's like "The Hills Have Eyes", after you incapacitate them you better slit their throat or something. I know it's just a movie but.....

 

[jh1]

If the teeth smashing blow is the first incapacitating blow, then you're golden.

Sig.

 

[jh1]

Yeah, but what if it's like "The Hills Have Eyes", after you incapacitate them you better slit their throat or something. I know it's just a movie but.....

That's true IRL as well.

Dead people don't talk. If you have to take things that far, you're probably better off killing them anyway so that they can't tell their side of the story.

If they are dead, you say: All I know is that I felt that if I didn't kill them in that very moment that I would be dead in the next moment.

Better yet, have your lawyer say it for you.

Nobody to oppose your story if they dead as fuck.

 

[Stefka]

Crap, I'm never getting admitted to the bar now.

 

[jh1]

Crap, I'm never getting admitted to the bar now.

It's over-rated. But I know everyone in the industry in STL, I can get you into any bar here you want.

 

[Stefka]

Sig.

As your lawyer, I advise you to give me k for that sig.

 

[samoth]

Holy thread hijack.

 

[rnch]

Holy thread hijack.

TICR

 

[jh1]

TICR

TINTCR

 

[rnch]

TINTCR

KMA

 

[Mr. dB]

KMFDM

 

[Mr. dB]

LSMFT

 

[rnch]

mmm ohh u ssss eeeee