Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Dainabol for more than 5 weeks?
- Thread starter braveheart1
- Start date
Tryn2BeBig
New member
right on huck finn, nice correction
ultragainz
New member
you can hit 8 weeks of d-bol if you know how to watch the liver good.....
ultragainz
New member
"Huck" you a good man.....=)
CYCLEON
New member
ditto on what huck said - "Dianabol Wall" misconception seems to have come from one of the "experts" who put that in the writeup for dbol several years ago - gotta research things on your own tho bro - parroting a paragraph found online somewhere and presenting it as gospel just wont do. I notice it didnt do anything for ahhhnold either. 
CRAZYPITBULL
New member
Thanks Huck,there's always a lot of debate on this topic.
chemical_freak
New member
Huck--
First of all, I apologize if I appeared to be downgrading anyone or questioning their knowledge. True, you have a profound understanding and vast knowledge of AS, and I wasn't questioning that. I come to this board for answers as well. I happen to be very educated in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry. So, I understand what you're saying about the metabolic processes involved in the administration of dbol, as well as all other AS. I simply wasn't gonna get into all that since he wasn't asking for such an indepth answer. I didn't say that dbol just magically stopped working after six weeks. But, I DO KNOW from experience...both peresonally and from hundreds of others...that the positive affecdts associated with dbol diminish greatly after 5 weeks. So, I offered the 6 week suggestion as an answer to the original question. Now, you obviously feel like you need to make others feel beneath you judging from your response to me. To say the least, all the pharmacological and biological explanantions in the world will not tell this guy what he needs to know. cold hard factual evidence from personal experiences are what prevail on this board, IMO. Having said all this, I apologize if I ruffled your feathers, and I hope to maintain the positive image I have tried tp portray on this board.
Later
CF
First of all, I apologize if I appeared to be downgrading anyone or questioning their knowledge. True, you have a profound understanding and vast knowledge of AS, and I wasn't questioning that. I come to this board for answers as well. I happen to be very educated in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry. So, I understand what you're saying about the metabolic processes involved in the administration of dbol, as well as all other AS. I simply wasn't gonna get into all that since he wasn't asking for such an indepth answer. I didn't say that dbol just magically stopped working after six weeks. But, I DO KNOW from experience...both peresonally and from hundreds of others...that the positive affecdts associated with dbol diminish greatly after 5 weeks. So, I offered the 6 week suggestion as an answer to the original question. Now, you obviously feel like you need to make others feel beneath you judging from your response to me. To say the least, all the pharmacological and biological explanantions in the world will not tell this guy what he needs to know. cold hard factual evidence from personal experiences are what prevail on this board, IMO. Having said all this, I apologize if I ruffled your feathers, and I hope to maintain the positive image I have tried tp portray on this board.
Later
CF
LOL,how did I try to make anyone feel underneath me?That makes absolutely zero sense,as all I did was disprove YOUR statements with FACT,not "what I experienced after 5 weeks of my only cycle of d-bol"...Outside of the FACTS that I have stated above,I have also ran d-bol MYSELF on multiple occassions,as well as have coached others,and I can tell you once again,YOU ARE WRONG...D-bol does not stop working at the 5 to 6 week point...Rather than making statements like"I can't believe no one on the board has told you this"as if you've suddenly educated us all and we should all just stop our d-bol usage at the 5 week mark because "chemical freak" said so,why don't you offer some FACTS to your statements,other than just empty rhetoric which is nothing more than opinion?I base my comments not only on real-world results of MANY users(including myself)but also Scientific FACT,and I don't resort to making comments like"I can't believe no one has told you that"except for when someone like yourself has chosen to condescend to the good folks of this board...BTW,these members are more educated than you give them credit for,so stop with the holier than thou approach,because you will get laughed off this site.
