Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below Testosterone boy
New member
Citruscide said:
Projection is the one tenet of psychology that I have great faith in based on a multitude of reinforcing experiences.
However I I00% agree that women think only of themselves.
Last edited:
Projection is the one tenet of psychology that I have great faith in based on a multitude of reinforcing experiences.
However I I00% agree that women think only of themselves.
C
Citruscide
Guest
Excellant.
C-ditty
C-ditty
polarpixie
New member
Have you ever considered that maybe your whole problem lies in the very fact that you have this view of women as a completely different entity than you? It sounds like whenever you meet a woman, you can't think of anything else but, "'WOMAN', Must react accordingly to 'WOMAN, sexual and irrational being', must manipulate my own behavior in order to manipulate her behavior and control the entire interaction and not let HER get the best of me."
You obviously have enough sense to realize that there are women who don't fit into your generalization. Maybe you should focus on meeting more women who don't fit into your category rather than continuing to repeat your mistakes and picking the wrong women, and in turn, confirming your neat little theory. Or would it shatter your whole world to find out that there are fewer 'irrational' women than you thought there to be, and be proven wrong?
Or maybe this isn't even about women being irrational or not. Maybe this is about your own ideas of how dating, or a relationship is supposed to play out, and you feeling let down or taking it personally when women don't act the way you think they should. In the meantime, they had no clue what your expectations of them were in the first place because you were never direct about what you wanted out of the relationship.
"The issue of being a rational person... I believe is a genetic defect in women. It is a double edged sword, because while men posses rational thought... we also posses a penis. Women know this... and, I'll give them credit for trying to take advantage of it. ".
Now this is a little ironic because, it seems to me that by putting so much thought into this and actually believing that women are born with a 'genetic' defect of being irrational, you're the one being irrational, or if you won't accept that, it's an incredibly simple and infantile statement to make.
"It is not in women, that we must look... but ourselves. Once we become masters of ourselves... women will no longer be an issue."
That's the only sensible thing said in that entire post. Aren't you in California? Go play in the sun! Work on obtaining inner peace and happiness within yourself instead of wasting all this negative energy making up silly theories.
That's all I have to say for now. I'm off to play in the sun now, but I'll be back to check to see what little condescending comment you'll make to 'put me in my place' even though you know I'm right.
You obviously have enough sense to realize that there are women who don't fit into your generalization. Maybe you should focus on meeting more women who don't fit into your category rather than continuing to repeat your mistakes and picking the wrong women, and in turn, confirming your neat little theory. Or would it shatter your whole world to find out that there are fewer 'irrational' women than you thought there to be, and be proven wrong?
Or maybe this isn't even about women being irrational or not. Maybe this is about your own ideas of how dating, or a relationship is supposed to play out, and you feeling let down or taking it personally when women don't act the way you think they should. In the meantime, they had no clue what your expectations of them were in the first place because you were never direct about what you wanted out of the relationship.
"The issue of being a rational person... I believe is a genetic defect in women. It is a double edged sword, because while men posses rational thought... we also posses a penis. Women know this... and, I'll give them credit for trying to take advantage of it. ".
Now this is a little ironic because, it seems to me that by putting so much thought into this and actually believing that women are born with a 'genetic' defect of being irrational, you're the one being irrational, or if you won't accept that, it's an incredibly simple and infantile statement to make.
"It is not in women, that we must look... but ourselves. Once we become masters of ourselves... women will no longer be an issue."
That's the only sensible thing said in that entire post. Aren't you in California? Go play in the sun! Work on obtaining inner peace and happiness within yourself instead of wasting all this negative energy making up silly theories.
That's all I have to say for now. I'm off to play in the sun now, but I'll be back to check to see what little condescending comment you'll make to 'put me in my place' even though you know I'm right.
C
Citruscide
Guest
I give up... I give up on everything.
C-ditty
C-ditty
vinylgroover
New member
The mark of a real man is how he handles adversity and how he comes back from it.
While it may feel good at the time, whining and bitching are unproductive actions and emotions that eventually reduce a man to an ineffective, emotional basket case.
While it may feel good at the time, whining and bitching are unproductive actions and emotions that eventually reduce a man to an ineffective, emotional basket case.
supersizeme
New member
Geez.
Citrus - why you continue to post your sage-like advice on relationships and how to get women to appreciate men is beyond me. You're that guy at carnivals who sits in the dunking booth jeering at people who are walking by, only when they come up to throw a ball at the target to knock you in, you push the button yourself and into the tank you go.
You still don't quite get it, but at least you seem to be using the word "cunt" a lot less. So that in itself is progress. You just haven't quite gotten past the whole notion of the power struggle in relationships. You're so focused on having control and not getting walked on that you miss the point of being in a relationship.
On one end of the spectrum you have the token "nice guy." This guy gets shit on continually in relationships unless he happens to find someone who doesn't grow bored of his obseqious nature(unlikely). Then on the other spectrum, there are dudes like you. You are so focused on being the anti-nice guy, that you take it to an extreme where it's no longer productive. You went 10 miles past the healthy balance where your relationship is in sync, and no one's worrying about who's in control.
Relationship Spectrum
===
---nice guy
-
-
-
-
-
-
---normal, balanced relationship guy
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
---Citruscide
===
The inherent problem with your viewpoint on where a guy needs to stand in a relationship is the following. Let's say hypothetically speaking that you are in a relationship, and for all practical purposes you've got complete control. You hold the cards. You're the man. You control what you all do for fun, you control the way things go in the bedroom, you control the conversations, and your girl never gives you criticism or backlash from your actions. So in the mind of C-Ditty, this is a perfect relationship because your chances of getting walked on are minimal to non-existent.
Ok here comes the problem...
That's boring as shit!!
You will end up leaving this girl for the exact same reason that nice guy's girlfriend dumps him every single time. Your feet will be asleep before you know it. Do you want a girlfriend that never stands up for herself? I sure don't. You don't either unless you have yet to be in a relationship where that's the case and don't know what it's like. Lack of self-confidence is as attractive as ass acne.
You need to get your ego in check, big perm. The fact that you have the audacity to claim yourself to be some sort of muse to the male EF population on the subject of women and relationships, when at 27 years of age(or however old you are) you're displaying for us the mentality/maturity of someone in their late teens or early 20s is comical.
Citrus - why you continue to post your sage-like advice on relationships and how to get women to appreciate men is beyond me. You're that guy at carnivals who sits in the dunking booth jeering at people who are walking by, only when they come up to throw a ball at the target to knock you in, you push the button yourself and into the tank you go.
You still don't quite get it, but at least you seem to be using the word "cunt" a lot less. So that in itself is progress. You just haven't quite gotten past the whole notion of the power struggle in relationships. You're so focused on having control and not getting walked on that you miss the point of being in a relationship.
On one end of the spectrum you have the token "nice guy." This guy gets shit on continually in relationships unless he happens to find someone who doesn't grow bored of his obseqious nature(unlikely). Then on the other spectrum, there are dudes like you. You are so focused on being the anti-nice guy, that you take it to an extreme where it's no longer productive. You went 10 miles past the healthy balance where your relationship is in sync, and no one's worrying about who's in control.
Relationship Spectrum
===
---nice guy
-
-
-
-
-
-
---normal, balanced relationship guy
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
---Citruscide
===
The inherent problem with your viewpoint on where a guy needs to stand in a relationship is the following. Let's say hypothetically speaking that you are in a relationship, and for all practical purposes you've got complete control. You hold the cards. You're the man. You control what you all do for fun, you control the way things go in the bedroom, you control the conversations, and your girl never gives you criticism or backlash from your actions. So in the mind of C-Ditty, this is a perfect relationship because your chances of getting walked on are minimal to non-existent.
Ok here comes the problem...
That's boring as shit!!
You will end up leaving this girl for the exact same reason that nice guy's girlfriend dumps him every single time. Your feet will be asleep before you know it. Do you want a girlfriend that never stands up for herself? I sure don't. You don't either unless you have yet to be in a relationship where that's the case and don't know what it's like. Lack of self-confidence is as attractive as ass acne.
You need to get your ego in check, big perm. The fact that you have the audacity to claim yourself to be some sort of muse to the male EF population on the subject of women and relationships, when at 27 years of age(or however old you are) you're displaying for us the mentality/maturity of someone in their late teens or early 20s is comical.
C
Citruscide
Guest
supersizeme said:
I really do want to be "balanced relationship" guy... But I'm not sure that is possible. I have never looked at things the way you have stated them here... and i have to say, I'm a bit taken aback by your post.
I'm never sure where my problem stems with relationships... I do seem to have that whole "power" thing... but perhaps not in the way you are talking about. It's more so in that I desire "complete attention" -- and I give it back, as well... I find that many people LACK that... and you are right... once or twice I have had it... and ... well... it's pretty boring.
Not sure really how to "step down" from where I'm at now SSM... If I did, I'm sure I do it... Thing is, my gut tells me to act one way... and I always react the other way.
Go figure...
C-ditty
B
Baoh
Guest
lamamacita said:
Agreed. She probably owned him well.
