Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Circumcision vs Non circumcision?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Razorguns said:
i've NEVER found a woman who's said 'damn, i wish yours wasn't cut'. just 2 cents.

Have you ever told a woman "Damn I wish your tits were bigger"???
 
Circumcision recommended to fight HIV
Staff and agencies
30 March, 2007


By ALEXANDER G. HIGGINS, Associated Press Writer Wed Mar 28, 5:54 PM ET

GENEVA - U.N. health agencies recommended Wednesday that heterosexual men undergo circumcision because of "compelling" evidence that it can reduce their chances of contracting HIV by up to 60 percent.

But World Health Organization and UNAIDS experts said men need to be aware that circumcision is only partial protection against the virus and must be used with other measures.

Studies suggest 5.7 million new cases of HIV infection and 3 million deaths over 20 years could be prevented by male circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa, the agencies said.

Otherwise, they could develop a false sense of security and engage in high-risk behaviors that could undermine the partial protection provided by male circumcision, the agencies said.

The recommendations were based on a meeting earlier this month in Montreux, Switzerland, where experts discussed three trials — in Kenya, Uganda and South Africa — that produced "strong evidence" of the risk reduction resulting from heterosexual male circumcision.

The agencies said much depends on the situation in a given country, and little general benefit will result in countries where the HIV epidemic is concentrated among sex workers, injecting drug users or men who have sex with men.

"It was therefore recommended that countries with high prevalence, generalized heterosexual HIV epidemics that currently have low rates of male circumcision consider urgently scaling up access to male circumcision services," the agencies said.

"The recommendations represent a significant step forward in HIV prevention," said Dr. Kevin De Cock, director of WHO‘s HIV/ AIDS department. "Countries with high rates of heterosexual HIV infection and low rates of male circumcision now have an additional intervention which can reduce the risk of HIV infection in heterosexual men."

Although the rate of circumcision varies considerably from country to country, globally an estimated 665 million men, or 30 percent of men in the world, are circumcised, the statement said.

Priority should be given to providing circumcision to age groups at highest risk of acquiring HIV because it will have the most immediate impact on the disease. But, it said, circumcising younger males also will have a public health impact over the longer term.

It gave no estimate how much providing the service would cost, but said more money would be needed, but that donors should regard it as "an important, evidence-based intervention."
 
musclemom said:
My son's father was circumcised himself, whaddya think? How weird would it be for a little boy to grow up with a penis that isn't like his father's or any other male he sees? C'mon.

So if his dad lost a limb in the war, how weird would it be for a little boy to grow up with four intact limbs?

Having been the little boy whose peepee was different, it's no big deal. It's no weirder than when dad has hairy things between his legs and sonny doesn't. Or if dad has black hair and brown eyes and sonny has brown hair and blue eyes. Adults and children are different.

People will go to such great lengths to rationalize this stupid barbaric ritual.
 
Mr. dB said:
So if his dad lost a limb in the war, how weird would it be for a little boy to grow up with four intact limbs?

Having been the little boy whose peepee was different, it's no big deal. It's no weirder than when dad has hairy things between his legs and sonny doesn't. Or if dad has black hair and brown eyes and sonny has brown hair and blue eyes. Adults and children are different.

People will go to such great lengths to rationalize this stupid barbaric ritual.

+1 for dB
 
A foreskin is not a birth defect in need of surgical correction.
 
musclemom said:
My son's father was circumcised himself, whaddya think? How weird would it be for a little boy to grow up with a penis that isn't like his father's or any other male he sees? C'mon.

Look, dear, I've been personally involved with 9 penises in my lifetime (counting my son, hey, who do you think changed the diapers!) and I told you which one, and it was ONLY one, was untrimmed.

And I'm not Jewish, and only two of the men in question were Jewish.
today it would be less likely
 
heavy_duty said:
God is not happy with the mothers who cut their son's cocks!
God and Jesus were uncut, it's in the bible.
Yeah - having mulitple wives is also in the Bible.

I have a problem with people who read the Bible and take it literally. Actually, Abraham circumsized his son as a covenant to God (God's orders).

People, don't take the Hebrew Bible literally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom