Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Buzz Aldrin - Falcon Punch
- Thread starter EnderJE
- Start date
hahahha badass, that conspiracy asshole deserved it.
I have to say it's difficult to believe a successful manned moon landing and return to Earth was accomplished in the 1960's given the crude computing and navigation tech available to them. Having said that, I don't really see how anyone has been harmed in faking it, and the asshole in Aldrin's face deserved a smack.
So then you would have to say its difficult to believe that the cover up involving hundreds of thousands of people was accomplished for the past 40 years and not a single person has managed to leak the truth, or a single investigative reporter has managed to break the story.
Razorguns
Well-known member
Yeah THOUSANDS of nasa employees over the years, russian scientists, family members, all have kept a secret to their graves. Of course, we should rather believe uneducated car salesmen who write books instead of worldwide scientists instead on these matters.
Did you know we want to the moon SIX TIMES. If there was goign to be a fraud, why would they do it six times, why not stop at 1? And don't you think russian scientists would've gone to the ends of the earth to embarass america if they even got a whim of a fraud?
Also 9/11 was created by the joos. Bin Laden's a paid actor.
r
chewyxrage
New member
lmfao, nice.
in other news NASA fucked up recently by losing the original landing footage.
in other news NASA fucked up recently by losing the original landing footage.
redsamurai
Banned
I honestly don't think we went "the first time".........yeah we eventually went there cause we had to stick the flag in incase some other country went and was like "hey, where's your flag fuckface's?". The first time, imo, was a fake to make sure we won the propaganda war against communism. The soviets getting to space first would have been a HUGE blow to the U.S's global marketing ambitions. Funny thing is, NASA is govt. funded....so was the soviet space program....so what's the fucking difference? There is none, it's all a big broadway act we're being shown. Always has been, always will be.
Razorguns
Well-known member
And your facts come from used car salesman and fast food workers who post on the net. Or should it come from the THOUSANDS of worldwide educated scientists and engineers from Russia and the US (and their families) from the past 40 years?
Which do you want to believe? We can't even protect our borders, presidents from scandals or hurricaine levees but we can pull off some 40 year old conspiracy involving thousands of people around the world over 3 generations. hahaha!
r
Last edited:
redsamurai
Banned
there's still some things that at least I never saw explained. Shadows on the moon that couldn't have come from just the one light source they were using, the lack of delay using the analog equipment, the apparent "touching up" that NASA did to the original archive photo's. There was some program I watched that "attempted" to go after some of these discrepancies, and of course to the guy doing the show his explanations made perfect sense....but they just didn't fly. And I was told from a physicist that under no circumstances did we have the technology back then to put men through the van allen belt let alone electronic equipment. The guys going up would have had to be encassed in some sort of tomb to shield themselves through the belt. Those suits they wore on liftoff were not enough. I'm not an expert on electronics, so I took the guys word for it that the "relatively" primitive state of electronics back then would not have made it through and would have failed at some point along the trip. When you're in space you have ZERO margin for error....."zero". So again, I dunno. The whole thing about fooling 95% of the NASA employees is sticking point, but who knows. During ww2 the british made the suez and a close by city completely disappear to German bombers........misdirection goes a long way.
redsamurai
Banned
but I still like the fact that aldrin decked that dude. Even if that guy were to be proven right, hounding an old man like that who isn't going to admit anything anyway is just retarded. Did he think he was going to get buzz to break down in tears and admit to something? "IF" the whole thing was bullshit Aldrin will take it to his grave. And of course if it wasn't his punch was even that much more deserved.
Razorguns
Well-known member
EVERYTHING you claim has been debunked by scientists, engineers, family members, nasa and researchers time and time again for decades. Google for sites with pages and pages of technical explanations that you'll never understand anyways. There's WAREHOUSES of documents from the six moon landings for you to peruse if you ever want.
However, untrained, uneducated people refuse to believe the technical explanations until Nasa takes you to the moon and shows you. So what's the point?
Have you ever seen a scientist say the moon landing was fake? A Russian? A chinese? A reporter? It's always American living room scientists who have nothing better to do than waterdown America's greatest triumph.
r
redsamurai
Banned
how bout the head of a polymer physics program that was better than MIT's under his watch? 
Similar threads
