Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below my fiance suggested a trip to the cinema so i said, to see what?she replied, to see a love story. hmmmmmm i thought that sounds really uninteresting. she continued, its a love story about two cowboys riding the range called broke back mounting, hmmmmmmmm.what a film title name for a love story indeed and after recovering my composure i decided to pass on this wonderful opportunity.now call me old fashioned but when i usually think of American cowboys i think of men like john Wayne in true grit, Clint Eastwood and the spaghetti westerns or even the magnificent seven,not rawhide meets Elton john.now, i don't know if they end up married and living happy ever after but if this is the state of the American cowboy genre today ill just have to stick with the old tapes.this should be up for at least a couple of golden globes for sure so perhaps this is indicative of some parts of the film industry today.
broke butt mountain
- Thread starter tanka
- Start date
it looks like tinsel town is working to an agenda here.i can only guess at what john Wayne would have made of this rewrite of how the west was won.when i see a western i want to see straight talking, straight shooting men. i don't expect to see as Arnold schwarzenegger put it.......... girlymen.ill be giving this film a miss.perhaps im just old fashioned that way.whats next........ a very butch cassidy and the sundance kid?
ohhhhh razor some straight acting guys can be just so bitchy.i can understand the paranoia developing with guys like George bush and governor Arnold around preventing homosexuals from getting married in dresses but from my perspective i find it amusing, laughable if faintly ridiculous.as long as there isn't a gay remake of blazing saddles or raw hide played by butch tough guys that im subjected to ill laugh at it all. some in this world take a different approach.i can understand the paranoia when men like rodman the basketball player recently stated on air that gay and bi sexual people are the weirdest people in the world and i dont like being around them.your views on gay cowboys and cw music being predominantly gay are best voiced on the safety of this board by you and are not born out by fact or generally held views.if you want a more frank discussion on this subject pm me.
MsBeverlyHills
New member
saw it...wouldnt exactly call it a "love story". There was more making out in the audience (I saw it in West Hollywood) then there was on screen. Anyway, I dont think it was an "awesome" movie at all- slow paced, boring dialogue & way too many dull scenes of mountains & sheep.
I can understand why the cowboys hooked up tho, their wives in the movie were pretty hideous. your didnt miss much.
I can understand why the cowboys hooked up tho, their wives in the movie were pretty hideous. your didnt miss much.
Longhorn85
New member
Yet another attempt by leftist Hollwywood to shove their liberal agenda down the thoat of traditional America.
reigninghard
New member
good stuffcurling said:
Longhorn85
New member
starfish said:
Of course the theatre was full. America loves a good western...
<snip>
"Hollywood has now raped the Marlboro Man. It has taken a revered symbol of America – the cowboy – with all the powerful emotions and associations that are rooted deep down in the pioneering American soul, and grafted onto it a self-destructive lifestyle it wants to force down Americans' throats. The result is a brazen propaganda vehicle designed to replace the reservations most Americans still have toward homosexuality with powerful feelings of sympathy, guilt over past "homophobia" – and ultimately the complete and utter acceptance of homosexuality as equivalent in every way to heterosexuality. "
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48076
no amount of propaganda dressed up and masquerading as a cowboy love story is going to convince any real man into believing that that life style is equally valid or equivalent in any way .power to you longhorn85 for the excellent and succinct snip which sums the situation up in its entirety so well,and for your straight talking words curling, which certainly resonate their truth in many men's mind everywhere.
Longhorn85 said:
Give me a break. I suggest you stay home..in fact hide in your closet. We don't want you attacked by all that homo propganda
You really have to be uptight to get so fired up on two people caring about each other. Yeah...lets just bring more hate into the world. Fabulous idea.
You honestly see more tits and ass in the movie than anything else.
M
Megalomaniac
Guest
Longhorn85 said:
Using Wyoming in the process! How funny is it that they film this movie in the Cowboy state where hate crimes originated for this exact thing. Wyoming is one of the least liberal states and it is just ironic to me. I have no problem with it and might even watch the film, I just enjoy a bit more reality is my films. It should have been filmed in Oregon.
Longhorn85
New member
starfish said:Give me a break. I suggest you stay home..in fact hide in your closet. We don't want you attacked by all that homo propganda
You really have to be uptight to get so fired up on two people caring about each other. Yeah...lets just bring more hate into the world. Fabulous idea.
You honestly see more tits and ass in the movie than anything else.
Recognizing another blatant attempt by Hollywood to spread liberal propaganda is not spreading hate.
I won't stay home, but I'll choose the movies I see, and that won't be one of them. You're the one who is uptight young lady.
all these senseless labels being banded around with the unsuccessful intention of stifling reasoned debate.a women who supports homosexuals causes is, I'm reliably informed..... called a fag hag.i guess because they generally tend to look like.......... old hags.nothing to get to uptight about.
strangebrew
New member
It's actually a very good movie. If you don't have some idiotic bias about watching two gay cowboys, then you'll probably like it. It's a well made film whether you like the content or not.
Longhorn85
New member
Brokeback Mountain is just the latest installment of a broad agenda:
<snip>
Conceiving their book as a "gay manifesto for the 1990s," the authors called for homosexuals to repackage themselves as mainstream citizens demanding equal treatment, rather than as a promiscuous sexual minority seeking greater opportunity and influence.
"We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay -- even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence." Alas, "To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled 'moral choices and sin' and give the religious intransigents a stick to beat us with.
http://www.bpnews.net/printerfriendly.asp?ID=18598
<snip>
Conceiving their book as a "gay manifesto for the 1990s," the authors called for homosexuals to repackage themselves as mainstream citizens demanding equal treatment, rather than as a promiscuous sexual minority seeking greater opportunity and influence.
"We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay -- even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence." Alas, "To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled 'moral choices and sin' and give the religious intransigents a stick to beat us with.
http://www.bpnews.net/printerfriendly.asp?ID=18598
strangebrew
New member
Longhorn85 said:
lol @ liberal propaganda. God, that's stupid. I'm republican, but I'm also a big fan of film. And it's a damn good film. I find it fucking hilarious how people let their political agenda get in the way of watching a good movie.
Longhorn85
New member
strangebrew said:
It's a big tent, baby. Are you a Log Cabin Republican?
strangebrew
New member
Longhorn85 said:
No idea what that is. The extremists on both sides irritate the crap out of me though.
Brokeback Mountain is just the latest installment of a broad agenda:
<snip>
Conceiving their book as a "gay manifesto for the 1990s," the authors called for homosexuals to repackage themselves as mainstream citizens demanding equal treatment, rather than as a promiscuous sexual minority seeking greater opportunity and influence.
"We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay -- even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence." Alas, "To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled 'moral choices and sin' and give the religious intransigents a stick to beat us with.
real men everywhere will be nodding there heads in agreement to this snip.this synthesises all logical thought on this subject down to a few paragraphs and power to you longhorn85 for doing some creditable home work here.the repackaging has begun but the contents remain intrinsically the same.call me old fashioned but i always assume that supporters of this agenda are homosexual until concretely proven other wise.it saves time and energy.
<snip>
Conceiving their book as a "gay manifesto for the 1990s," the authors called for homosexuals to repackage themselves as mainstream citizens demanding equal treatment, rather than as a promiscuous sexual minority seeking greater opportunity and influence.
"We argue that, for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay -- even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence." Alas, "To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled 'moral choices and sin' and give the religious intransigents a stick to beat us with.
real men everywhere will be nodding there heads in agreement to this snip.this synthesises all logical thought on this subject down to a few paragraphs and power to you longhorn85 for doing some creditable home work here.the repackaging has begun but the contents remain intrinsically the same.call me old fashioned but i always assume that supporters of this agenda are homosexual until concretely proven other wise.it saves time and energy.
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
It's a good thing that you're an idiot and your opinion doesn't matter.
strangebrew mutant id recommend you voice those views on the relative safety of this board and I'm sure its a recommendation you follow at a safe distance as you would find your life seriously complicated very quickly indeed if you chose other wise.now what id really like to do is put a reassuring arm over your shoulder and take you over one or two issues you have and I'm confident id bring you round to my point of view and straighten you up very quickly indeed. for a more frank discussion pm me.
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
Huh? Holy crap, dude. Speak english.
Upon further review, it looks like he might be hitting on me in this post.
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
That's pretty gay, bro.
I'm not gay, but I'm not homophobic. I don't care what you do, just realize the same rules apply to couples no matter the gender ratio. I really don't want to see billy bob and lulu playing tonsel hocky in the seat to my left any more than I want to see Shane and Brent doing the same to my right.
When I watch porn it has at least one female. It's just how I like it.
I really don't have a desire to pay 8 bucks to watch a gay love story. I probably wouldn't watch a love story western if the main characters weren't gay.
A good western for me is something along the lines of Tombstone. Action throughout, memorable quotes, and the bad guys getting blasted. It's a western, not swan lake.
When I watch porn it has at least one female. It's just how I like it.
I really don't have a desire to pay 8 bucks to watch a gay love story. I probably wouldn't watch a love story western if the main characters weren't gay.
A good western for me is something along the lines of Tombstone. Action throughout, memorable quotes, and the bad guys getting blasted. It's a western, not swan lake.
strangebrew
New member
lol, why do people think this is a western? I'd put it in the Drama/Romance category.
strangebrew
New member
Longhorn85 said:
Actually, I didn't. And still have no clue wtf it means.
I also wasn't referring to your post, I was referring to what tanka said after it.
Jesus.
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
Uh oh...Looks like we got ourselves a tough guy.
Douche.
Extra_Strong
Well-known member
gay guys that act straight. That is fine with me. I just dont like the strange voice that some have.. and mannerisms. but i dont mind " 
"
I saw the movie. it is sad though that some people have to hide their love in fear of death.. awwww
I thought the movie was ok except for the suprise
butt fuck in the tent.
he just spit on his oh hand and shoved er in .. ekkkkk .. I looked at my wife.. and her eyes were as big as the screen. ha ha. getty up..
"I saw the movie. it is sad though that some people have to hide their love in fear of death.. awwww
I thought the movie was ok except for the suprise
butt fuck in the tent.
he just spit on his oh hand and shoved er in .. ekkkkk .. I looked at my wife.. and her eyes were as big as the screen. ha ha. getty up.. September 19, 2005
Pope bans homosexuals from ordination as priests
World Net Daily September 19, 2005
Applicants with 'gay' tendencies won't be admitted to seminaries
Pope Benedict XVI has given his approval to a new Vatican policy document that bans men with homosexual tendencies from being ordained as priests, reports Catholic World News.
The policy statement is a direct result of the pope's concern about the homosexual pedophilia scandal in the church – especially in the U.S.
The new document, prepared by the Congregation for Catholic Education in response to a request made by the late Pope John Paul II in 1994, will be published soon. It will take the form of an "Instruction," signed by the prefect and secretary of the congregation: Cardinal Zenon Grocholewski and Archbishop Michael Miller, according to the report.
text, approved by Benedict at the end of August, says that homosexual men should not be admitted to seminaries even if they are celibate, because their condition suggests a serious personality disorder that detracts from their ability to serve as ministers, says the CWN report.
Priests who have already been ordained, if they suffer from homosexual impulses, are strongly urged to renew their dedication to chastity and a manner of life appropriate to the priesthood.
The "Instruction" does not represent a change in church teaching or policy, according to the Vatican.
Catholic leaders have consistently taught that homosexual men should not be ordained to the priesthood. Pope John XXIII approved a formal policy to that effect, which still remains in effect. However, during the 1970s and 1980s
The Congregation for Catholic Education prepared the "Instruction" after soliciting advice from all of the world's bishops, from psychologists and from moral theologians. A draft was then circulated among the Vatican dicasteries concerned with the issue, notably including the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
The pending release of the "Instruction," in the face of certain criticism from liberal forces in America and Western Europe, demonstrates the determination of the Vatican to improve the quality of priestly ministry and to protect the church from some of the scandals that have recently shaken the Catholic community – and no doubt deterred many men from entering priestly training.
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
i can fully understand homosexual paranoia developing when men like the new pope, George bush and governor Arnold make such, unjust and very disparaging comments about there life styles.
Pope bans homosexuals from ordination as priests
World Net Daily September 19, 2005
Applicants with 'gay' tendencies won't be admitted to seminaries
Pope Benedict XVI has given his approval to a new Vatican policy document that bans men with homosexual tendencies from being ordained as priests, reports Catholic World News.
The policy statement is a direct result of the pope's concern about the homosexual pedophilia scandal in the church – especially in the U.S.
The new document, prepared by the Congregation for Catholic Education in response to a request made by the late Pope John Paul II in 1994, will be published soon. It will take the form of an "Instruction," signed by the prefect and secretary of the congregation: Cardinal Zenon Grocholewski and Archbishop Michael Miller, according to the report.
text, approved by Benedict at the end of August, says that homosexual men should not be admitted to seminaries even if they are celibate, because their condition suggests a serious personality disorder that detracts from their ability to serve as ministers, says the CWN report.
Priests who have already been ordained, if they suffer from homosexual impulses, are strongly urged to renew their dedication to chastity and a manner of life appropriate to the priesthood.
The "Instruction" does not represent a change in church teaching or policy, according to the Vatican.
Catholic leaders have consistently taught that homosexual men should not be ordained to the priesthood. Pope John XXIII approved a formal policy to that effect, which still remains in effect. However, during the 1970s and 1980s
The Congregation for Catholic Education prepared the "Instruction" after soliciting advice from all of the world's bishops, from psychologists and from moral theologians. A draft was then circulated among the Vatican dicasteries concerned with the issue, notably including the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
The pending release of the "Instruction," in the face of certain criticism from liberal forces in America and Western Europe, demonstrates the determination of the Vatican to improve the quality of priestly ministry and to protect the church from some of the scandals that have recently shaken the Catholic community – and no doubt deterred many men from entering priestly training.
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
i can fully understand homosexual paranoia developing when men like the new pope, George bush and governor Arnold make such, unjust and very disparaging comments about there life styles.
bodypump2
New member
i love the whole concept of a "gay agenda" please! two mo's cant make a decision on a couch! how the fuck do you think they can get organized well enought to have an agenda....unless you mean whats on the brunch menu, then im SO there...wow homophobia is alive and well on this post.
ass_face
New member
bodypump2 said:
Homophobia is such a stupid word. It is a known fact that when a heterosexual male is forced to watch gay sex, they get the same reaction in the same brain centers as if they were watching a kitten being smashed with a hammer. Heterosexuals find it disgusting and appalling. Not wanting to be exposed to that stimuli is not fear, it is more disgust.
I am sure it is a fine piece of cinema, but I don't think I need to waste my time watching it. The plot sounds dull. Boy meets boy. Boy assfucks boy. Boys return to wives. Boys meet ever so often to assfuck. One boy assfucks too much and gets killed. Other boy is sad.
Now... if they were gay, retarded cowboys... I would watch that shit. That would be some Oscar worthy shit.
now let me get this straight.the homosexual cowboy romance comes into full bloom when,and this must be worth a fist full of golden globes,one of the two love birds spits ever so considerately on his hand in the tent, and then ever so romantically I'm sure, shoves it tenderly up the others..........in search of Oscar no doubt.........now that's got to be equally valid.who ever said romance at the cinema was dead?now call me old fashioned, but, for the life of me and with visual film propaganda like that, i really cant work out why president George bush could be so against gay weddings and the pope and church so adamant against homosexual participation .it couldn't be a point of moral issue.i guess they must think, they'd be just too much of a................hand full.
this sums up the worlds religious response to homosexuals in general.now if only they had all waited until they had seen the tender intense depth of love occurring in that sweaty tent in brokebutt mountain then surely all would have been forgiven.you decide.
Anglican bishops vote against homosexuality
Leaders of the Anglican church from around the world have declared that homosexuality is "incompatible" with the Bible.
Anglican Bishops meeting at the Lambeth Conference in Canterbury in south-east England voted overwhelmingly to uphold the ban on gay marriages and the ordination of gay priests.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, said there was no room for any homosexual activity
The BBC Religious Affairs Correspondent says the vote must raise questions over the willingness of all parts of the Anglican church
No gay tolerance in Africa's Anglican Church:
San Francisco Chronicle - Wednesday, January 14, 2004
Elizabeth Bryant, Chronicle Foreign Service
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lagos, Nigeria -- Obarou Adjarhu carries a Bible under one arm, and he knows his scripture. It says, according to Adjarhu's reading, that homosexuality is a sin. Today, tomorrow and, as far as the 32-year-old Nigerian businessman is concerned, forever.
"Those are the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah,"
Gays are certainly not welcome in Nigeria's 17 million-member Anglican church, whose primate, Archbishop Peter Akinola, condemned it a "satanic attack on the church of God." He even issued a statement on behalf of the "Primates of the Global South" -- a group of 20 Anglican primates from Africa, the West Indies, South America, India, Pakistan and Southeast Asia -- deploring the action and, along with Uganda and Kenya
The views of Anglicans in Africa are all-important to the church. The U.S. Episcopal Church, with 2.3 million members, is a small branch of the much larger Anglican church, with more than 77 million members worldwide. More than half of all Anglicans live in Africa, and many are vehemently anti-gay.
"Homosexuality is a deviation from the scriptures," said Adebola Ademowo, archbishop of Lagos, which is home to the world's largest Anglican "province," or congregation. "And we are not alone in this belief. All the other denominations here are just enthused with our stance. They are praying with us. "
. Sodomy carries a sentence of up to 14 years.
"Homosexuality is a spiritual sickness," said Patience Fehintola, 62, another parishioner at the Lagos cathedral. "It needs first of all repentance and soul cleansing.
Such condemnations are echoed widely among both Christians and Muslims in a country where religion permeates everyday life. Dilapidated trucks painted with slogans like "Jesus is the Only Way" stumble down the nation's pitted roads. Prayer grounds the size of football fields line the highway between Lagos and the southern city of Ibadan, packing in thousands who listen avidly to success tips from evangelical "prosperity preachers."
"Homosexuality is a very divisive issue for the churches," said Samuel Kobia, the new head of the World Council of Churches and an ordained Methodist minister
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality and Islam
Below are some verses in the Quran that speak against homosexuality. Those people who make a god (ilah) of there own lusts are clearly in the wrong. Prophet Lut spoke against this evil practice of his people. Their only reply was: "Bring us the Wrath of God if thou tellest the truth." They soon found out who was telling the truth when Allah destroyed them all. Let it be known right now that there is NO SUCH THING AS A GAY MUSLIM!!! A Muslim is one who submits himself to the will of Allah. Those who practice this evil have submitted themselves to their own desires and have turned their backs on the clear teachings of Islam. These people will use any kind of rationalization to justify their sinful practices. Be not deceived by the smooth tactics of Shaitan. He will try everything to guide us from the wrong way.
If you have these homosexual desires in you seek refuge in Allah and Allah will help you. Allah has revealed the truth. All praise is for Allah!!!
The Islamic Society of North America:
Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi of the ISNA said: "Homosexuality is a moral disorder. It is a moral disease, a sin and corruption... No person is born homosexual, just like no one is born a thief, a liar or murderer. People acquire these evil habits due to a lack of proper guidance and education.""
"There are many reasons why it is forbidden in Islam. Homosexuality is dangerous for the health of the individuals and for the society. It is a main cause of one of the most harmful and fatal diseases. It is disgraceful for both men and women. It degrades a person. Islam teaches that men should be men and women should be women. Homosexuality deprives a man of his manhood and a woman of her womanhood. It is the most un-natural way of life. Homosexuality leads to the destruction of family life."
no chance!
Anglican bishops vote against homosexuality
Leaders of the Anglican church from around the world have declared that homosexuality is "incompatible" with the Bible.
Anglican Bishops meeting at the Lambeth Conference in Canterbury in south-east England voted overwhelmingly to uphold the ban on gay marriages and the ordination of gay priests.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, said there was no room for any homosexual activity
The BBC Religious Affairs Correspondent says the vote must raise questions over the willingness of all parts of the Anglican church
No gay tolerance in Africa's Anglican Church:
San Francisco Chronicle - Wednesday, January 14, 2004
Elizabeth Bryant, Chronicle Foreign Service
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lagos, Nigeria -- Obarou Adjarhu carries a Bible under one arm, and he knows his scripture. It says, according to Adjarhu's reading, that homosexuality is a sin. Today, tomorrow and, as far as the 32-year-old Nigerian businessman is concerned, forever.
"Those are the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah,"
Gays are certainly not welcome in Nigeria's 17 million-member Anglican church, whose primate, Archbishop Peter Akinola, condemned it a "satanic attack on the church of God." He even issued a statement on behalf of the "Primates of the Global South" -- a group of 20 Anglican primates from Africa, the West Indies, South America, India, Pakistan and Southeast Asia -- deploring the action and, along with Uganda and Kenya
The views of Anglicans in Africa are all-important to the church. The U.S. Episcopal Church, with 2.3 million members, is a small branch of the much larger Anglican church, with more than 77 million members worldwide. More than half of all Anglicans live in Africa, and many are vehemently anti-gay.
"Homosexuality is a deviation from the scriptures," said Adebola Ademowo, archbishop of Lagos, which is home to the world's largest Anglican "province," or congregation. "And we are not alone in this belief. All the other denominations here are just enthused with our stance. They are praying with us. "
. Sodomy carries a sentence of up to 14 years.
"Homosexuality is a spiritual sickness," said Patience Fehintola, 62, another parishioner at the Lagos cathedral. "It needs first of all repentance and soul cleansing.
Such condemnations are echoed widely among both Christians and Muslims in a country where religion permeates everyday life. Dilapidated trucks painted with slogans like "Jesus is the Only Way" stumble down the nation's pitted roads. Prayer grounds the size of football fields line the highway between Lagos and the southern city of Ibadan, packing in thousands who listen avidly to success tips from evangelical "prosperity preachers."
"Homosexuality is a very divisive issue for the churches," said Samuel Kobia, the new head of the World Council of Churches and an ordained Methodist minister
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homosexuality and Islam
Below are some verses in the Quran that speak against homosexuality. Those people who make a god (ilah) of there own lusts are clearly in the wrong. Prophet Lut spoke against this evil practice of his people. Their only reply was: "Bring us the Wrath of God if thou tellest the truth." They soon found out who was telling the truth when Allah destroyed them all. Let it be known right now that there is NO SUCH THING AS A GAY MUSLIM!!! A Muslim is one who submits himself to the will of Allah. Those who practice this evil have submitted themselves to their own desires and have turned their backs on the clear teachings of Islam. These people will use any kind of rationalization to justify their sinful practices. Be not deceived by the smooth tactics of Shaitan. He will try everything to guide us from the wrong way.
If you have these homosexual desires in you seek refuge in Allah and Allah will help you. Allah has revealed the truth. All praise is for Allah!!!
The Islamic Society of North America:
Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi of the ISNA said: "Homosexuality is a moral disorder. It is a moral disease, a sin and corruption... No person is born homosexual, just like no one is born a thief, a liar or murderer. People acquire these evil habits due to a lack of proper guidance and education.""
"There are many reasons why it is forbidden in Islam. Homosexuality is dangerous for the health of the individuals and for the society. It is a main cause of one of the most harmful and fatal diseases. It is disgraceful for both men and women. It degrades a person. Islam teaches that men should be men and women should be women. Homosexuality deprives a man of his manhood and a woman of her womanhood. It is the most un-natural way of life. Homosexuality leads to the destruction of family life."
no chance!
strangebrew
New member
Who cares what religious people think of homo's? They're mostly idiots anyways.
strangebrew, that just about sums up your negative contribution to this thread up to now.hundreds of millions of people world wide who dont buy into this gay agenda and they are, as your so fond of saying...... all idiots anyway.well, lets see some facts to back up your hypothesis that there all congenital idiots.what are you basing this on .lets see something positive for a change here.then we might give you some credit.has this got anything to do with affiliation to the log cabin republican movement?
strangebrew
New member
I don't know anything about a gay agenda. Frankly, I hate politics and could care less if homos can get married or not. I do like movies though. Good movies. Which I think is what this forum is about.
As for me calling religious people idiots, I did say "most" not all. However, as someone who grew up in a christian home, I find their beliefs to be a bit rediculous. Also, they tend to be some of the most hypocritcal and judgemental people on the planet. Funny, when their bible says to be the exact opposite.
And I'd really appreicate it if you would make your posts more readable. It's starting to give me a headache trying to decipher the drivel you post.
As for me calling religious people idiots, I did say "most" not all. However, as someone who grew up in a christian home, I find their beliefs to be a bit rediculous. Also, they tend to be some of the most hypocritcal and judgemental people on the planet. Funny, when their bible says to be the exact opposite.
And I'd really appreicate it if you would make your posts more readable. It's starting to give me a headache trying to decipher the drivel you post.
so you don't know anything about a gay agenda.you hate politics.you couldnt care less if (homos)get married or not.almost all the people who disagree with you are idiots.not that you have many view points, of course.and all this because there too judgemental.but you do like movies, awwwwwww.especially this gay one.this all sounds very imature and short sighted on your part. where is your sense of importance.you need to educate yourself about these issues and then you may be able to offer some valued insights.look, Ive travel through Europe and the UK. some parts of Africa, Australia, etc, and Ive found the view point of heterosexual men to be very consistent in regard to homosexuality.take a tablet for the headache and learn what men really think of these issues.now, if you have something positive to say,then post up.or you can pm me ,ill look forward to it.
strangebrew
New member
Wow.
You're an idiot. Plain and simple.
I can't even believe you're able to work a computer. Nothing you said had any relevance towards me or anything we've talked about.
I'm actually beginning to think you're just a fake persona trying to get a reaction from people on the internet. That would at least make more sense than you being as stupid as you appear, yet somehow able to perform simple functions, like typing.
That's it for me folks. Nice to see that EF hasn't decreased in quality while I've been away.
You're an idiot. Plain and simple.
I can't even believe you're able to work a computer. Nothing you said had any relevance towards me or anything we've talked about.
I'm actually beginning to think you're just a fake persona trying to get a reaction from people on the internet. That would at least make more sense than you being as stupid as you appear, yet somehow able to perform simple functions, like typing.
That's it for me folks. Nice to see that EF hasn't decreased in quality while I've been away.
Longhorn85
New member
strangebrew said:
Yeah, I caught that afterwards and deleted my post, but not before you saw it. My bad.
As far as broke butt mountain, I still don't plan to see it, but what I've read here it could have been titled: "Cowboys on the down-low"
strange brew mutant. everything you have said has been repeated back to you in its entirety ,and even you can appreciate how immature and short sighted it all sounds.most of the millions of people who disagree with you are still fakes, idiots, or hypocrites of course.lets reflect on some of your most recent statements.you don't know anything about a gay agenda.you hate politics.you couldn't care less if (HOMOS)get married or not.most people who are religious are idiots.there hypocrites and very judgemental.who cares what religious people think of (homos) their mostly idiots.funny when their bible says exactly the opposite?i do like movies though.thats it for me folks.and your response when you see how juvenile and uninformed this all sounds repeated back to you is, ....nothing you said had any relevance towards me or anything we've talked about?it has every relevance to you as they are your immature responses, repeated back to you .my advice to you is this.educate yourself about these issues and then your views will have some value.because people have a different opinion they are not mostly, idiots, hypocrites or fakes.and your biggest mistake would be to have the courage to repeat these comment's away from this board to a mans face, because you would find your life seriously complicated, very quickly indeed.
does this have anything to do with a political affiliation to the log cabin republican movement?ive heard its quite a broad based church with a very warm, wide open ,touchy feely policy for new recruits.regarding the Oscars, I'm just wondering if there not in danger of disappearing up there own broke butt mountain.ive read that in its first weekend it only pulled in just over $500,000,which is pretty dismal as some have pulled in over 75 million in the same time peroid.id like to clarify just one small point.when i said that in my travels ive found the view point of heterosexual men to be very consistant towards homosexuality.i meant very................................ consistently negative.especially in parts of south Africa .any overly friendly ,butch cowboys would find themselves head first over Victoria falls, there stetsons shoved where there fists have been, but the sun don't shine.
I am sooo glad the movie is sucking wind at the box office. It should tell stupid hollywood we don't like gay movies so stop putting them out or go broke you fruitcakes. I mean they are still running big ads in the weekend section saying how wonderful it is and how many awards it is winning. Who cares about the awards if this piece of crap movie is winning awards it must mean the award grantors have shit taste(literally) in movies anyway.
strangebrew
New member
speaking of shitty taste in movies - hey curling.
to help with education, here are some statistics about the homosexual lifestyle.
snip from politics.com
One hot button issue of today's modern election process is homosexuality and homosexual rights. On one side of the issue is homosexual and "gay" rights activist groups wanting the homosexual lifestyle promoted and endorsed by liberal politicians. On the other side are individuals and organizations that disagree with that position.
Beyond this, there is much more that can be said about homosexuality and the evidence shows the serious flaws of promoting this as an "alternative lifestyle".
For a moment, let's look at this from a completely secular viewpoint and forget about any moral issues. Now let us consider whether we would align ourselves with a candidate that endorses any unhealthy lifestyle, whether it be drug abuse, alcohol abuse, etc.
According to the Centers For Disease Control, 65% of all reported AIDS cases among U.S. males since 1981 have been men engaged in homosexual behavior. (CDC HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, May 1998)
According to the 1986 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), homosexuals account for an overwhelmingly disproportionate number of the cases of Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, and Gonorrhea.
The risk of anal cancer "soars" by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. The rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive. Condoms offer only limited protection. (Between the Lines, "Anal Cancer and You," Sept. 29, 2000.)
Men who engage in sodomy are 860% more likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), increasing up to 500% their risk of contracting HIV/AIDS.( Centers for Disease Control, "Resurgent Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease Among Men Who Have Sex With Men," September 10, 1999)
There are higher rates of non-fatal suicidal behavior among those with homosexual attractions than among the heterosexual population. (From a study in the March 2003 issue of The American Journal of Psychology)
Anal Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is nearly universal among HIV-positive homosexual men and about 60% in HIV-negative men exhibiting the same sexual behavior. (Infectious Disease News, "Because of HPV, anal cancer screening indicated for certain high-risk groups," October, 1997)
A recent study conducted in the Netherlands — where gay marriage has been legal for several years — found that the average homosexual relationship lasts only 1.5 years.(Maria Xiridou et al, “The Contributions of Steady and Casual Partnerships to the Incidence of HIV Infection Among Homosexual Men in Amsterdam,” AIDS, 17 2003: 1029-38)
A 1991 study of homosexual men revealed that their average number of lifetime partners was 308. ((H. Meyer-Balburg et al, “Sexual Risk Behavior, Sexual Functioning and HIV-Disease Progression in Gay Men,” Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 28, No. 1: 3-27)
A New England Journal of Medicine study of homosexuals who kept sexual diaries indicated that their number of annual sexual partners averaged nearly 100. (L. Corey and K.K. Holmes, “Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men.” New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, vol 302: 435-438)
Another major issue is the average lifespan of homosexuals compared to heterosexuals:
For homosexual males with a partner, the average lifespan was 45. For homosexual males without a partner, the average lifespan was 46. (Deaths examined between 1999 and 2001. Homosexual Partnerships and Homosexual Longevity: A Replication. Psychological Reports - 2002, 91, 671-678)
Out of 6,574 homosexual deaths, the average lifespan if AIDS was the cause of death was 39. The average lifespan if AIDS was not the cause was 42. For lesbians, the average lifespan was 44. (Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, Volume 29, Number 3, 1994. The Longevity of Homosexuals: Before and After the AIDS Epidemic.)
This is only a small example of the toll of the homosexual lifestyle, and shows that not only is homosexuality a moral issue, it is also an issue of why a public health risk should not be promoted or endorsed as a "gay" or alternative lifestyle by any politician.
snip from politics.com
it pays to know about the issues you talk about.
snip from politics.com
One hot button issue of today's modern election process is homosexuality and homosexual rights. On one side of the issue is homosexual and "gay" rights activist groups wanting the homosexual lifestyle promoted and endorsed by liberal politicians. On the other side are individuals and organizations that disagree with that position.
Beyond this, there is much more that can be said about homosexuality and the evidence shows the serious flaws of promoting this as an "alternative lifestyle".
For a moment, let's look at this from a completely secular viewpoint and forget about any moral issues. Now let us consider whether we would align ourselves with a candidate that endorses any unhealthy lifestyle, whether it be drug abuse, alcohol abuse, etc.
According to the Centers For Disease Control, 65% of all reported AIDS cases among U.S. males since 1981 have been men engaged in homosexual behavior. (CDC HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, May 1998)
According to the 1986 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), homosexuals account for an overwhelmingly disproportionate number of the cases of Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, and Gonorrhea.
The risk of anal cancer "soars" by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. The rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive. Condoms offer only limited protection. (Between the Lines, "Anal Cancer and You," Sept. 29, 2000.)
Men who engage in sodomy are 860% more likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), increasing up to 500% their risk of contracting HIV/AIDS.( Centers for Disease Control, "Resurgent Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease Among Men Who Have Sex With Men," September 10, 1999)
There are higher rates of non-fatal suicidal behavior among those with homosexual attractions than among the heterosexual population. (From a study in the March 2003 issue of The American Journal of Psychology)
Anal Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is nearly universal among HIV-positive homosexual men and about 60% in HIV-negative men exhibiting the same sexual behavior. (Infectious Disease News, "Because of HPV, anal cancer screening indicated for certain high-risk groups," October, 1997)
A recent study conducted in the Netherlands — where gay marriage has been legal for several years — found that the average homosexual relationship lasts only 1.5 years.(Maria Xiridou et al, “The Contributions of Steady and Casual Partnerships to the Incidence of HIV Infection Among Homosexual Men in Amsterdam,” AIDS, 17 2003: 1029-38)
A 1991 study of homosexual men revealed that their average number of lifetime partners was 308. ((H. Meyer-Balburg et al, “Sexual Risk Behavior, Sexual Functioning and HIV-Disease Progression in Gay Men,” Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 28, No. 1: 3-27)
A New England Journal of Medicine study of homosexuals who kept sexual diaries indicated that their number of annual sexual partners averaged nearly 100. (L. Corey and K.K. Holmes, “Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men.” New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, vol 302: 435-438)
Another major issue is the average lifespan of homosexuals compared to heterosexuals:
For homosexual males with a partner, the average lifespan was 45. For homosexual males without a partner, the average lifespan was 46. (Deaths examined between 1999 and 2001. Homosexual Partnerships and Homosexual Longevity: A Replication. Psychological Reports - 2002, 91, 671-678)
Out of 6,574 homosexual deaths, the average lifespan if AIDS was the cause of death was 39. The average lifespan if AIDS was not the cause was 42. For lesbians, the average lifespan was 44. (Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, Volume 29, Number 3, 1994. The Longevity of Homosexuals: Before and After the AIDS Epidemic.)
This is only a small example of the toll of the homosexual lifestyle, and shows that not only is homosexuality a moral issue, it is also an issue of why a public health risk should not be promoted or endorsed as a "gay" or alternative lifestyle by any politician.
snip from politics.com
it pays to know about the issues you talk about.
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
Holy fucking shit!!! You mean having unprotected sex with many different partners can give you AIDS?
Oh my god. Someone should alert the media about this right now!
And the award for, "homosexuals are the weirdest people in the world and i don't like being around them"..(rodman category) goes to that wonderful, flamboyant, Hollywood film director leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee tamawhoriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii........................................................Los ANGELES Authorities say "James Bond" director Lee Tamahori was arrested last month in Los Angeles during a police prostitution sting.
First reported by T-M-Z-dot-com, a city attorney spokesman says Tamahori 55 was dressed in a black wig and a nice fetching off-the-shoulder dress when he approached an undercover police officer in Hollywood on January eighth and offered to perform sex for money. He was arrested for investigation of soliciting an act of prostitution and loitering with the intent to commit prostitution, both misdemeanors.
Tamahori's directing credits include Pierce Brosnan's 2002 James Bond film "Die Another Day" and last year's "xXx: State of the Union, starring Ice Cube and Samuel L. Jackson.
The director was originally scheduled for arraignment today but it was postponed until February 24th.
you couldn't make it up!.im sure the cops booked him in whistling the bond theme tune, oooh oooh 7 . if this Hollywood film director is any thing to go by then ang lee, producer of broke butt mountain looks like he may yet get his hands on that Oscar .after spitting on it ,I'm sure hell know exactly where to put it.
First reported by T-M-Z-dot-com, a city attorney spokesman says Tamahori 55 was dressed in a black wig and a nice fetching off-the-shoulder dress when he approached an undercover police officer in Hollywood on January eighth and offered to perform sex for money. He was arrested for investigation of soliciting an act of prostitution and loitering with the intent to commit prostitution, both misdemeanors.
Tamahori's directing credits include Pierce Brosnan's 2002 James Bond film "Die Another Day" and last year's "xXx: State of the Union, starring Ice Cube and Samuel L. Jackson.
The director was originally scheduled for arraignment today but it was postponed until February 24th.
you couldn't make it up!.im sure the cops booked him in whistling the bond theme tune, oooh oooh 7 . if this Hollywood film director is any thing to go by then ang lee, producer of broke butt mountain looks like he may yet get his hands on that Oscar .after spitting on it ,I'm sure hell know exactly where to put it.
rocky_road
New member
I liked it. It wasn't boring, and I get bored in movies so easily. It was an interesting bit of a history lesson for me because I was born in the late 1980's. However, parts of it will be torturous for guys who don't like to see two guys kissing.
I know this because I brought a straight guy with me.
Their was a lot of laughter in the audience when we went. It made it playful and not so serious. I think that's the only reason my friend survived.
I know this because I brought a straight guy with me.
Their was a lot of laughter in the audience when we went. It made it playful and not so serious. I think that's the only reason my friend survived.
strangebrew
New member
rocky_road said:
One of the reasons I hate going to the theater.
So many douchebags.
I'm 100% hetero but what is so gross about two guys kissing? Is it any worse than a horrendously ugly chick kissing a dude? Homophobes = insecurity at it's finest.
Just as it is true that not every man who enjoys watching two men on screen kissing and indulging in anal sex is a homosexual .it is also a true that the majority of people who do enjoy watching it, are homosexual. history tells us that in regard to male homosexuals, they can be just a little economical with the truth.it only seems like yesterday that the singer George Michael was proclaiming himself to be straight, until he was so unfairly dragged from a gents for exposing himself and making lewd suggestions to a male police officer.hes now gay, of course. Elton john was happy to play it straight in the 80s. even going as far as to marry briefly.he says he has always been, homosexual .lee tamahori was playing it straight untill the unfortunate incident mentioned earlier. when, masquerading as a women prostitute and exploring hes feminine side,he tried to dry hump an under cover police officer.how ill conceived .the list is seemingly endless.which bring me to my point.if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck ,it is a duck.
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
Who said anything about enjoying it?
You are the king of strawman.
strangebrew mutant, in the spirit of understanding and wanting to clarify that........... I know exactly where your coming from.theres a question id like to ask you .WHAT WAS IT ABOUT TWO GAY COWBOYS MAKING OUT IN A TENT THAT ATTRACTED YOU TO THIS FILM IN THE FIRST PLACE?.........................and as you were sitting there in that darkened cinema, wide eyed and bushy tailed I'm sure. just starring up at those two butch cowboys in that tent scene.and you really have to hand it to them! that must have been a labour of pure love. he spits lovingly on his hand and so............. considerately, shoves it right in.did you find it really hard .....errrrrrrrr to watch, or did you find it...... come surprisingly easy for you at that moment?a simple yes here will do, bro.did everything in that moment make sense to you ?.......also were there any low points, at all for you in this movie?....if you don't want to answer that directly, that's OK bro.what ever gets you through the night .now, i know that it hasn't slipped your attention that a number of the, learned bros have called this film any thing from gross, to disgusting ,and appalling etc.and stated how they have no intention of seeing it,myself included here.but, i really do hope that in the spirit of mutual understanding you can realise that some would just prefer to watch a traditional film, occasionally .thanks bro.
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
I consider myself somewhat of a film buff, I've seen thousands of movies. I see practically every movie that comes out. And while you may not have any interest in seeing movies other than ones that include the sensational talent of Martin Lawrence or Jean Claude Van Dam. Others do and see it as a form of art.
Now if you don't like the content and hate homosexuality because you secretly love the cock yourself. That's fine. Just say it. But don't try to criticize a movie you've never seen.
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
Sorry, but a horrendously ugly chick does nothing for me. Hence the analogy.
Let me break it down for you, since you obviously have an issue with reading comprehension.
Ugly chick making out with a dude = no arousal, no disgust.
Two dudes making out = no arousal, no disgust.
Hot chick making out with a dude = no arousal, no disgust
Two hot chicks making out = some arousal
So, I'm no math expert but I think the lesbians win this one.
My point - you're only homophobic because you've been told to be homophobic. Also, do you find the idea of two women having sex, disgusting? After all, isn't that "unnatural?" If you don't, then you're a hypocrite. If you do, you're probably a homosexual.
So, tanka, which one is it? Hypocrite or fag?
strangebrew
New member
tanka said:
Just answer the question, bro. I won't judge.
I've always been perfectly straight according to my girlfriend, and very consistent .my views change for no one.you know that by now, strangebrew.you need to chill out a little more.look,your one of the few guys to have seen this film and in that respect the posts have been disappointing .yes, the posts have been humorous and we've all had a good laugh between us on this thread. but, as a guy who considers broke butt a "damn" good film you have given no explanation as to why that is.after seeing this film do you ,or does anyone else think its, truly deserving, Oscar material?
Extra_Strong
Well-known member
tanka said:
Well when i watched it I really believed they loved each other and that they loved to give each other a good fuck in the butt. I do not really see how the acting could of been better. they truly made me believe they were straight up gay..
and that one liked to visit the 
ass once in a while 
wee hawwww
A
alien amp pharm
Guest
Just like two dudes kissing in public, I have no desire to see it.
I do not like homosexuality, dramas, nor love stories.
I think some people go to see it ONLY to support the gay agenda, not because they thought it was a good movie.
I do not like homosexuality, dramas, nor love stories.
I think some people go to see it ONLY to support the gay agenda, not because they thought it was a good movie.
There is no vaccine for stupidity or ignorance. Which, is precisely why so many homosexual men, still die of full blown AIDS.Of far greater cause for concern in the homosexual community, is the fact that, SCIENTISTS have just discovered a far more DEADLY, mutated version of the AIDS VIRUS..... in a homosexual male, formerly living in new york.Now, a very much dead homosexual, in a box, in New York.This far more deadly version .....KILLS WITHIN WEEKS OF CONTRACTION.The authorities are working in the knowledge that he led a typically "active",nefarious, homosexual life style and are trying to trace any, shirt lifting friends he may of had a,.. "relationship" with.I do hope its not too serious.with the way this is all progressing, broke butt 2 will have to show the two tent love birds, in neck to foot plastic jump suits.... face masks and surgical gloves just to send out the right, health and safety message.A sort of, "equally valid" homosexual version of gone with the wind in the twenty first century, i suppose.
bodypump2 said:
What dumb comparisons. You can be homophobe without beating the shit out of gay dude the right way(get the pun). Do you think all homophobe(what a stupid word) I mean people that don't accept the homosexual lifestyle as being acceptable are killing fags? Dang, I have never done anything mean to a gay dude. I found out a an aquaintence of mine was a flamer and never said nothing to him about. Do I like that fact that he is gay no. I wish he would get some help but I am not going to punch him for being gay. That is like punching a heroin addict for addicted to heroin.
That would be silly you just get them help so they can beat that sin.
Longhorn85 said:
How is this movie "liberal"? Just because you don't like it and because it ruffles your own insecurities you label it that? This movie was in no way political, either conservative or liberal. Geez.. you so easily make yourself the laughing stock with your own narrowminded posts.
Apparently, America and the rest of the nonWalmart crowd don't agree with you.
American Film Institute - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Picture
Win
American Society of Cinematographers - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Cinematography
Rodrigo Prieto Nominated
Berlin Film Festival - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Film
Win
Boston Society of Film Critics - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Win
Broadcast Film Critics Association - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Nominated
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Win
Best Score
Gustavo Santaolalla Nominated
Best Screenplay
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana Nominated
Best Song
Emmylou Harris Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Jake Gyllenhaal Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Michelle Williams Win
Chicago Film Critics Association - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Nominated
Best Cinematography
Rodrigo Prieto Win
Best Director
Ang Lee Nominated
Best Original Score
Gustavo Santaolalla Win
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Screenplay
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Jake Gyllenhaal Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Michelle Williams Nominated
Dallas-Ft. Worth Film Critics Associati - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Cinematography
Rodrigo Prieto Win
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Win
Directors Guild of America - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Director
Ang Lee Nominated
Golden Globe - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor - Drama
Heath Ledger Nominated
Best Original Score
Gustavo Santaolalla Nominated
Best Original Song
Gustavo Santaolalla, Bernie Taupin Nominated
Best Picture - Drama
Nominated
Best Screenplay
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Michelle Williams Nominated
Independent Spirit Award - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Nominated
Best Director
Ang Lee Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Michelle Williams Nominated
Iowa Film Critics Association - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Director
Ang Lee Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
L.A. Film Critics Association - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor (Runner-up)
Heath Ledger Win
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Win
Las Vegas Film Critics Association - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Win
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Win
London Film Critics Association - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Nominated
Best Director
Ang Lee Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Screenplay
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana Nominated
Natinal Society of Film Critics - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor (Runner-up)
Heath Ledger Win
National Board of Review - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Jake Gyllenhaal Win
New York Film Critics Circle - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Win
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Win
Online Film Critics Association - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Nominated
Best Adapted Screenplay
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana Nominated
Best Cinematography
Rodrigo Prieto Nominated
Best Director
Ang Lee Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Score
Gustavo Santaolalla Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Jake Gyllenhaal Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Michelle Williams Nominated
Phoenix Film Critics Association - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Win
Best Adapted Screenplay
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana Win
Best Cinematography
Rodrigo Prieto Win
Best Supporting Actor
Jake Gyllenhaal Win
Best Supporting Actress
Michelle Williams Win
Top Ten Film of the Year
Win
San Francisco Film Critics Circle - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Win
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Win
Screen Actors Guild - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Nominated
Best Ensemble
Nominated
Best Supporting Actor
Jake Gyllenhaal Nominated
Best Supporting Actress
Michelle Williams Nominated
St. Louis Gateway Film Critics Associat - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Actor
Heath Ledger Win
Best Director
Ang Lee Win
Best Picture
Win
Best Screenplay
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana Win
Writers Guild of America - 2005
Category Nominee Win/Nominated
Best Adapted Screenplay
Larry McMurtry, Diana Ossana Nominated
Randy Dotinga
HealthDay Reporter
FRIDAY, Feb. 11 (HealthDay News) -- New York City health officials are sounding the alarm about the appearance of an HIV "superbug" -- a strain of the virus so powerful that it's resistant to nearly all AIDS drugs and rapidly weakens the immune system.
The unusual combination of drug resistance and quick progression to full-blown AIDS may have never been seen before, New York City Health Commissioner Thomas R. Frieden said Friday. "We do not know how widespread it is," he said. However, "we know that it is a wake-up call."
Officials have only found the strain in one unidentified homosexual man, a city resident in his mid-40s who used the street drug crystal methamphetamine and reported having unprotected anal sex with several men. He was diagnosed in December with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, and tests suggest he was infected in October, although it could have been months earlier.
Typically, it takes an average of about 10 years for someone to be stricken with AIDS after infection with HIV. In the New York man's case, full-blown AIDS appeared in a matter of weeks, not years. What makes the man's case even more exceptional is that he's also resistant to three of the four types of antiviral AIDS drugs that combat the disease.
"To go from infection to disease in a matter of a few months is very unusual. To do that in conjunction with such a highly resistant strain is also unusual," Frieden said. "Putting them both together is what's so unique."
Recent studies have suggested that drug resistance is a growing problem among AIDS patients, but it usually develops in people who have already been undergoing antiviral treatment. Doctors suspect the AIDS virus strengthens and mutates when patients take breaks from their drug regimens.
New York City health officials are trying to track down the man's homosexual partners, but they don't yet know how far the newly discovered HIV strain may have spread, Frieden said. A health alert has been issued that calls for hospitals and doctors in the city to be on the lookout for the new strain.
The role of crystal methamphetamine in the man's infection is also unclear. Health officials have warned for years that the drug is popular in the gay community, and researchers say it can contribute to unprotected sex by lowering inhibitions.
it pays to know about the issues you talk about.
HealthDay Reporter
FRIDAY, Feb. 11 (HealthDay News) -- New York City health officials are sounding the alarm about the appearance of an HIV "superbug" -- a strain of the virus so powerful that it's resistant to nearly all AIDS drugs and rapidly weakens the immune system.
The unusual combination of drug resistance and quick progression to full-blown AIDS may have never been seen before, New York City Health Commissioner Thomas R. Frieden said Friday. "We do not know how widespread it is," he said. However, "we know that it is a wake-up call."
Officials have only found the strain in one unidentified homosexual man, a city resident in his mid-40s who used the street drug crystal methamphetamine and reported having unprotected anal sex with several men. He was diagnosed in December with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, and tests suggest he was infected in October, although it could have been months earlier.
Typically, it takes an average of about 10 years for someone to be stricken with AIDS after infection with HIV. In the New York man's case, full-blown AIDS appeared in a matter of weeks, not years. What makes the man's case even more exceptional is that he's also resistant to three of the four types of antiviral AIDS drugs that combat the disease.
"To go from infection to disease in a matter of a few months is very unusual. To do that in conjunction with such a highly resistant strain is also unusual," Frieden said. "Putting them both together is what's so unique."
Recent studies have suggested that drug resistance is a growing problem among AIDS patients, but it usually develops in people who have already been undergoing antiviral treatment. Doctors suspect the AIDS virus strengthens and mutates when patients take breaks from their drug regimens.
New York City health officials are trying to track down the man's homosexual partners, but they don't yet know how far the newly discovered HIV strain may have spread, Frieden said. A health alert has been issued that calls for hospitals and doctors in the city to be on the lookout for the new strain.
The role of crystal methamphetamine in the man's infection is also unclear. Health officials have warned for years that the drug is popular in the gay community, and researchers say it can contribute to unprotected sex by lowering inhibitions.
it pays to know about the issues you talk about.
SNIP FROM; WIKIPEDIA,the free encyclopedia. There has NEVER been any evidence at all in any memoirs about Duke (John Wayne)by those that knew him, that ever even hinted that there was a suspicion of him being gay; Not even from people that had an axe to grind with him. It is laughable that anyone can cast innuendo and unsubstantiated gossip about a man that spent his life as an American icon of male sexuality. Incredible! Just as someone else on this thread so eloquently put forth.........if you have no facts I guess you can allege that every man in the world is a homosexual. It's childish and without merit. Rockshake 16:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
On 13 June - Powerpleb added:
I have trouble with the statement of him being gay as he fathered seven children. Rhymeless 07:51, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Lets just stick to the FACTS please, if you have evidence, present it, if not. Everyone in the WORLD is an alleged homosexual, like Hugh Heffner, Ronald Regan, etc.
I have read many books about Wayne (and those associated with him like John Ford) and talked to people who worked with him, and there is no evidence of him being homosexual or bisexual. According to film director and historian David Bradley. Wayne was easily dominated by women he was in relationships with, and never got over breaking up with Marlene Dietrich, but that does not establish him as being anything but heterosexual.
JesseG 02:40, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
(the standard homosexual response) Many homosexuals have fathered many children in the past because they were in denial due to the former taboo in many societies many years back. It is also possible for homosexuals to have hetrosexual relationships by pretending that their partner is of the same gender. Secondly there is so much denial over John Wayne being gay because of "homophoebic fans". Finally, I heard that his homosexual confession was written in one of his "diaries" and discovered after he died.
W wanderers 11:53, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Homosexual confession my ass. Wayne never kept a diary.
Hey, ya know, he walked kind of funny. That makes him gay. Just like Jack Benny. Wahkeenah 23:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
End of snip from; wikipedia,the free encyclopedia.
It pays to know about the issues you talk about.
On 13 June - Powerpleb added:
I have trouble with the statement of him being gay as he fathered seven children. Rhymeless 07:51, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Lets just stick to the FACTS please, if you have evidence, present it, if not. Everyone in the WORLD is an alleged homosexual, like Hugh Heffner, Ronald Regan, etc.
I have read many books about Wayne (and those associated with him like John Ford) and talked to people who worked with him, and there is no evidence of him being homosexual or bisexual. According to film director and historian David Bradley. Wayne was easily dominated by women he was in relationships with, and never got over breaking up with Marlene Dietrich, but that does not establish him as being anything but heterosexual.
JesseG 02:40, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
(the standard homosexual response) Many homosexuals have fathered many children in the past because they were in denial due to the former taboo in many societies many years back. It is also possible for homosexuals to have hetrosexual relationships by pretending that their partner is of the same gender. Secondly there is so much denial over John Wayne being gay because of "homophoebic fans". Finally, I heard that his homosexual confession was written in one of his "diaries" and discovered after he died.
W wanderers 11:53, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Homosexual confession my ass. Wayne never kept a diary.
Hey, ya know, he walked kind of funny. That makes him gay. Just like Jack Benny. Wahkeenah 23:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
End of snip from; wikipedia,the free encyclopedia.
It pays to know about the issues you talk about.
ass_face
New member
This is pretty funny.... I wrote a review on Yahoo movies and basically said some pretty funny shit... well some pillow biter reported me to Yahoo. I used another ID and did the same thing... and another cum guzzler reported me... Decided to see if there was a queer police thing going on and lo and behold my third review was reported to yahoo...lol.
Having read your synthesised broke butt mountain film review Ass Face, its quite obvious that yahoo have let them selves down badly, this time. I'm perplexed as to how any,twinkle toed- fruit cake could fail to see............. obvious good humour, and your good intentions in every line.In fact, if the name.... ASS FACE, strangely turns up as the script writer for broke butt 2,then the first ticket is mine.Now that would be some seriously, funny shit.ass_face said:
chicknlegs
New member
I watched it and I am straight and love my ladies.
I didn't think it was a bad film... I guess some guys are just afraid to face facts that some guys are into that. Just not me.
I didn't think it was a bad film... I guess some guys are just afraid to face facts that some guys are into that. Just not me.
Numerical Facts about,"some guys are into that.Just not me."Or me.
Snip from Traditional Values.
While homosexuals claim they make up 10% of the population, the reality is closer to just, 1 to 2%.
“The most widely accepted study of sexual practices in the United States is the National Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS).
The NHSLS study found that only 0.9% of men and 0.4% of women reported having only same-sexual partners since age 18, a figure that would represent a total of only 1.4 million Americans as homosexual.
The truth is that homosexuals used the bogus 10% figure in order to inflate their numbers and their influence.
What do scientific surveys and studies show about how many homosexuals actually exist? As long ago as the early 1990s, statistics showed that the 10% was false.
USA Today, in its April 15, 1993 issue published the following statistics from a Planned Parenthood/Alan Guttmacher Institute study:
Only 1.1% said they were exclusively gay.
A 1992 French study found that only 1.4% of men and 0.4% of women said they had any same-sex contact in the past five years.
The Wall Street Journal shed more light on the 10% urban legend in its March 31, 1993 issue:
A survey conducted by the Minnesota Adolescent Health Survey (1986-86) of public school students indicated that only 0.6% of boys and 0.2% of girls identified themselves "mostly or 100% homosexual"-which is less than one percent.
In Canada, a 1988 survey of first-year college students under 25 indicated that 98% were heterosexual; 1% bisexual; and 1% homosexual. (Source: King, et al. Canada, Youth and AIDS Study, Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University.)
Census Figures Show Few Homosexual Households
The Census 2000 figures show that homosexuals exist in far fewer numbers. According to Census 2000 figures, there are a total of 106,741,426 households in the U.S., only 00.42% of those are unmarried same-sex households. This is less than one percent.
Gay Activist Admits The 10% Figure Is Bogus
Bruce Voeller, a gay activist has admitted in his book, Some Uses and Abuses of the Kinsey Scale that the 10% figure was a myth used to promote the homosexual agenda. According To Voeller: ...after years of our educating those who inform the public and make its laws, that concept that 10 percent of the population is gay has become generally accepted as “fact.” ... As with so many pieces of knowledge and myth, repeated telling it made it so…
end of snip from family values.
It pays to know about the issues you talk about.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
snip from paul ministries.
1% Of The Population Is Homosexual.
Fact: New research found only (1%) of males are homosexual and numerous recent studies report woman have about as half of the male prevalence rate (.5%). Not one study after 1960 has revealed any data that supports the 10% theory.
Facts:
The Alan Guttmacher Institute published in Family Planning Perspectives (March/April 1993) found only 1% had exclusively homosexual relationships.
The University of Chicago’s Nation Research Corp. (NORC) survey reported 0.7%.
The Morton-Hunt study found that about 1% of males and .5% of females are homosexual.
Fact: Homosexual leaders now admit that they knowingly exploited the inaccurate 10% myth in order to impose their lifestyle upon the American people. Tom Stoddard, a militant leader in the homosexual movement, told Newsweek in February 1993, "We used that figure when most gay people were entirely hidden to try to create an impression of our numerousness."
(And what practises are this 1 to 2% getting up too exactly .errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr well, )
Table 5. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) conducted
a study about homosexual sex practices and found the following:
98% report anal sexual relations.
92% report oral/anal sexual activity.
78% report participating in group sex.
73% of adult male homosexuals have had sex with boys age 19 or younger.
42% report "fisting" where the hand or arm is inserted into the rectum of their partner.
37% report sadomasochism.
32% report bondage.
29% report urinating on or in their partners.
17% report eating and/or rubbing themselves with the feces of their partners.
15% report sex with animals.
12% report giving or receiving of enemas for sexual pleasure.
end of snip from Paul Ministeries.
It pays to know about the issues you talk about.
Snip from Traditional Values.
While homosexuals claim they make up 10% of the population, the reality is closer to just, 1 to 2%.
“The most widely accepted study of sexual practices in the United States is the National Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS).
The NHSLS study found that only 0.9% of men and 0.4% of women reported having only same-sexual partners since age 18, a figure that would represent a total of only 1.4 million Americans as homosexual.
The truth is that homosexuals used the bogus 10% figure in order to inflate their numbers and their influence.
What do scientific surveys and studies show about how many homosexuals actually exist? As long ago as the early 1990s, statistics showed that the 10% was false.
USA Today, in its April 15, 1993 issue published the following statistics from a Planned Parenthood/Alan Guttmacher Institute study:
Only 1.1% said they were exclusively gay.
A 1992 French study found that only 1.4% of men and 0.4% of women said they had any same-sex contact in the past five years.
The Wall Street Journal shed more light on the 10% urban legend in its March 31, 1993 issue:
A survey conducted by the Minnesota Adolescent Health Survey (1986-86) of public school students indicated that only 0.6% of boys and 0.2% of girls identified themselves "mostly or 100% homosexual"-which is less than one percent.
In Canada, a 1988 survey of first-year college students under 25 indicated that 98% were heterosexual; 1% bisexual; and 1% homosexual. (Source: King, et al. Canada, Youth and AIDS Study, Kingston, Ontario: Queen's University.)
Census Figures Show Few Homosexual Households
The Census 2000 figures show that homosexuals exist in far fewer numbers. According to Census 2000 figures, there are a total of 106,741,426 households in the U.S., only 00.42% of those are unmarried same-sex households. This is less than one percent.
Gay Activist Admits The 10% Figure Is Bogus
Bruce Voeller, a gay activist has admitted in his book, Some Uses and Abuses of the Kinsey Scale that the 10% figure was a myth used to promote the homosexual agenda. According To Voeller: ...after years of our educating those who inform the public and make its laws, that concept that 10 percent of the population is gay has become generally accepted as “fact.” ... As with so many pieces of knowledge and myth, repeated telling it made it so…
end of snip from family values.
It pays to know about the issues you talk about.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
snip from paul ministries.
1% Of The Population Is Homosexual.
Fact: New research found only (1%) of males are homosexual and numerous recent studies report woman have about as half of the male prevalence rate (.5%). Not one study after 1960 has revealed any data that supports the 10% theory.
Facts:
The Alan Guttmacher Institute published in Family Planning Perspectives (March/April 1993) found only 1% had exclusively homosexual relationships.
The University of Chicago’s Nation Research Corp. (NORC) survey reported 0.7%.
The Morton-Hunt study found that about 1% of males and .5% of females are homosexual.
Fact: Homosexual leaders now admit that they knowingly exploited the inaccurate 10% myth in order to impose their lifestyle upon the American people. Tom Stoddard, a militant leader in the homosexual movement, told Newsweek in February 1993, "We used that figure when most gay people were entirely hidden to try to create an impression of our numerousness."
(And what practises are this 1 to 2% getting up too exactly .errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr well, )
Table 5. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) conducted
a study about homosexual sex practices and found the following:
98% report anal sexual relations.
92% report oral/anal sexual activity.
78% report participating in group sex.
73% of adult male homosexuals have had sex with boys age 19 or younger.
42% report "fisting" where the hand or arm is inserted into the rectum of their partner.
37% report sadomasochism.
32% report bondage.
29% report urinating on or in their partners.
17% report eating and/or rubbing themselves with the feces of their partners.
15% report sex with animals.
12% report giving or receiving of enemas for sexual pleasure.
end of snip from Paul Ministeries.
It pays to know about the issues you talk about.
Corinthian
New member
The more gays that are out of the closet, it means they are not taking up valuable chick resources. The more gay guys the better us non gays. its all about supply and demand.
BTW the film was actually shot in CANADA
BTW the film was actually shot in CANADA
Respected independent studies from across the world confirm the male homosexual population to be just 1 to 2 %.No respected study has gone above 2%.This would seem to be consistent and accurate.The figure of 10% emanated from the homosexual community. snip from Paul Ministeries Fact: Homosexual leaders now admit that they knowingly exploited the inaccurate 10% myth in order to impose their lifestyle upon the American people. Tom Stoddard, a militant leader in the homosexual movement, told Newsweek in February 1993, "We used that figure when most gay people were entirely hidden to try to create an impression of our numerousness." If we were to assume the 10% figure to be correct then haemorrhoid cream would out strip global production at this time . Now call me old fashioned, but this had me pausing for thought ; The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) conducted
a study about homosexual sex practices and found the following:
42% report "fisting" where the hand or arm is inserted into the rectum of their partner.
29% report urinating on or in their partners.
17% report eating and/or rubbing themselves with the feces of their partners.(Pause for thought)
15% report sex with animals.(MAJOR PAUSE FOR THOUGHT, 15%)
12% report giving or receiving of enemas for sexual pleasure Now that's .....errrr, equally valid.what was that about,........ neck to foot plastic jump suits,face masks and surgical gloves.You couldn't make it up. As that great basketball philosopher ,Rodman once said, "homosexuals are the weirdest people in the world and i don't like being around them".
a study about homosexual sex practices and found the following:
42% report "fisting" where the hand or arm is inserted into the rectum of their partner.
29% report urinating on or in their partners.
17% report eating and/or rubbing themselves with the feces of their partners.(Pause for thought)
15% report sex with animals.(MAJOR PAUSE FOR THOUGHT, 15%)
12% report giving or receiving of enemas for sexual pleasure Now that's .....errrr, equally valid.what was that about,........ neck to foot plastic jump suits,face masks and surgical gloves.You couldn't make it up. As that great basketball philosopher ,Rodman once said, "homosexuals are the weirdest people in the world and i don't like being around them".
Similar threads
