Big will always be in!

[RussianBear]

I would have to disagree and say that big is not in with the ladies maybe guys. Its one thing to have great muscle simitry and be lean and cut but when you get up in the 280lbs at 5'8 thats pushing it. I know plenty of girls who love muscle but when you take it too far thats when it ends. However there is a few honeys out there that love the freaky look.

 

[PatBateman]

What's going to get more looks, a well proportioned 5' 10" 200 pound guy, or a equally well proportioned 5' 10" 225 pound guy carrying the same bodyfat?

yeah, but and I am taking liberties here, the bigger one gets, the harder it is to maintain a low bodyfat. If we are talking about what chicks care about, I would say that a low bodyfat comes way before sheer size. If you are under 9%, you are pretty much set at any bodyweight if you have some decent, not monster, size.

 

[WARBIRDWS6]

yeah, but and I am taking liberties here, the bigger one gets, the harder it is to maintain a low bodyfat. If we are talking about what chicks care about, I would say that a low bodyfat comes way before sheer size. If you are under 9%, you are pretty much set at any bodyweight if you have some decent, not monster, size.

exatly my point.

 

[WARBIRDWS6]

I would have to disagree and say that big is not in with the ladies maybe guys. Its one thing to have great muscle simitry and be lean and cut but when you get up in the 280lbs at 5'8 thats pushing it. I know plenty of girls who love muscle but when you take it too far thats when it ends. However there is a few honeys out there that love the freaky look.

exactly my point again...just add in FUCK WHAT THE BITCHES LIKE at this point.

 

[Silent Method]

given equally proper proportions and BF of course the 225 guy. but the larger you get (e.g. 280 fucking pounds, lol) it starts to go back to the "smaller" dude. go compare DJ to nasser. nuff said.

I'll agree that their is a too big. I'm one of those who thinks that many of the modern mass freaks, while I can respect them, look absolutely ridiculous.

When I think of "small," I'm imagining those prepubescent looking weenie kids in underwear ads. When I think big, a fit 220+ will suffice.

 

[Silent Method]

yeah, but and I am taking liberties here, the bigger one gets, the harder it is to maintain a low bodyfat. If we are talking about what chicks care about, I would say that a low bodyfat comes way before sheer size. If you are under 9%, you are pretty much set at any bodyweight if you have some decent, not monster, size.

Lets stick with the 200 and 225 pound guys and give them an average 12 percent bodyfat - not ripped, but if they are fit they will both look it. I think most girls I know would favor the bigger peice of meat.

 

[WARBIRDWS6]

I'll agree that their is a too big. I'm one of those who thinks that many of the modern mass freaks, while I can respect them, look absolutely ridiculous.

When I think of "small," I'm imagining those prepubescent looking weenie kids in underwear ads. When I think big, a fit 220+ will suffice.

yes, that is exactly what i want. i get more comments than bigger guys when i am at 175-180 5'8" and in decent shape, because i got my muscle in the right places, and decent vascularity/cuts. just need to keep the waist in line since i am short and i am alright (very hard for me to do, my lower ab fat is STUBBORN as all hell). but once at the 200-220 mark with low BF i would consider that ideal. for me, now a taller 6'2" guy may need 250-260 to look the same. but fuck the tall guys. lol.

 

[Silent Method]

yes, that is exactly what i want. i get more comments than bigger guys when i am at 175-180 5'8" and in decent shape, because i got my muscle in the right places, and decent vascularity/cuts. just need to keep the waist in line since i am short and i am alright (very hard for me to do, my lower ab fat is STUBBORN as all hell). but once at the 200-220 mark with low BF i would consider that ideal. for me, now a taller 6'2" guy may need 250-260 to look the same. but fuck the tall guys. lol.

I'm 6'2" damit! Looks we're in the same boat you and I. (I'm at 230, probably 220-225 after this cycle). We gots some work to do!

 

[WARBIRDWS6]

I'm 6'2" damit! Looks we're in the same boat you and I. (I'm at 230, probably 220-225 after this cycle). We gots some work to do!

yeppers. at least we get compliments at "underweight" mens health condition. lol. i hope to be at 190 after the next heavier cycle....then get to 200-205 after then following milder cycle. after that we will see. i know my training/supp/diet is spot on after all these years....and having no life helps too. lol. so if i get my cycle right, i figure i can't go wrong as long as i stay healthy. can't wait to get on the big cycle though....this winny/tren/"anavar" plus anti-E's and cutter drugs is nice.....but i want a big crazy stack cycle....NOW!!!!! only about 2 1/2 more weeks to go......

 

[Silent Method]

only about 2 1/2 more weeks to go......

No shit, me too! Yep, these last few weeks my brain has kicked into overdrive planning my next cycle!