Beware the Soviet Union

[Mr. dB]

Well there you have it -- she must be crazy. I can't believe she'd have the audacity to disagree with your point of view.






I'd start with this:

Comments: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: CIA Lied to Me - ABC News

When a sitting speaker of the house accuses a federal agency of a felony crime, then decides she doesn't want to talk about it anymore the next day, they are showing their nutjob behavior.

I don't find anything implausible or inconsistent in that. What happened in one day? She got the riot act read to her by someone. I find the remarks by Republicans in that article far more disturbing, especially:

"It's outrageous that a member of Congress should call a terror-fighter a liar," said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., the vice chairman of the Senate intelligence committee. "It seems the playbook is, blame terror-fighters. We ought to be supporting them."

 

[mrplunkey]

I don't find anything implausible or inconsistent in that. What happened in one day? She got the riot act read to her by someone. I find the remarks by Republicans in that article far more disturbing, especially:

Of course you do.

 

[Mr. dB]

Of course you do.

So we should just give the "Terror-Fighters" free reign?

 

[mrplunkey]

So we should just give the "Terror-Fighters" free reign?

If the sitting speaker of the house believes a federal agency is intentionally misleading Congress (a felony), she can 1) Engage the DoJ and 2) Organize congressional hearings or 3) Initiate legislation to reign-in the agency.

Which one did Nancy do?