Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

bent over rows...why jerk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter t3c
  • Start date Start date
PolishHammer1977 said:
Common sense allows you to know that jerking ANY weight will allow you to lift it with more of a ROM.

It does not however directly coorelate into any strength gains that I have been able to find.

This is a highly individual thing.
Certainly common sense tells you that you can lift more weight with more ROM when you jerk.

My question is, "would you say that including a jerk in your BB row would be along the same lines as a push press vs. OHP?"

I ask because it seems like a push press is a widely accepted lift...T3C got me thinking here.:think:
 
I think the push press is an excellent exercise. Yes a jerk will help you create more of a ROM. Will it increase strength? I dont know bc its a highly individual lift and it depends on the people lifting it. Will their strict OHP raise as a result? I dont know.

I just never liked the idea of jerking the barbell row due to the nature of the backward shoulder rotation. It doesnt seem like a feasible solution for gains IMHO. I see more damage than gain bc most people do not know how to lift. If you do infact know how to lift properly and safely than its a difft story.

Post a video if you have further questions. I would like to see what you are doing.
 
Can I still ask questions without a video? :)

My question isn't about my form...trust me, Nate tells me if I'm doing something incorrectly! it's more of a comparison of the two lifts because I love push presses.

BTW, don't have a camera...yet. Nate is working on it!
 
Nonerz said:
Can I still ask questions without a video? :)

My question isn't about my form...trust me, Nate tells me if I'm doing something incorrectly! it's more of a comparison of the two lifts because I love push presses.

BTW, don't have a camera...yet. Nate is working on it!

Of course you can always ask anything you want Nonerz!!

Nate is 1 man. 1 man. I am sure you could benefit from the WIDE perspectivers and peofessionals that view this board. I know people personally that view this board and do not post. THEY ARE PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES. It's all for YOUR benefit.

BTW, testosterone boy is an excellent advocate for any camera that you may purchase.
 
so basically you can argue all day about different exercises and justify bad form that way. if an exercise is meant to be "loose" in form or explosive then someone should stipulate it as such. a push press is called a push press, not a standing military press.

there are those that do side raises with dbells and dip when the weight is at the top, to me thats sloppy form. there are those that lean back when they do bicep curls, "counter balance" i dont think so.

so back to rowing. generally...the procedure goes like this:

"so and so" pushes with the legs to get the row moving....

pulls with the arms/back attempting to retract the scapula....

dips back down with the legs/torso slightly to ensure that the shoulder blades are pulled back.

i defy you to tell me thats a barbell row. its a leg assisted, jerky movement resembling a row. the reason why it doesnt have a name like "push press" does, is because there is no carryover. a push press assists a jerk or an overhead press. a sloppy row, helps.....your legs?

its a matter of priorities. if a person wants to get good at a sloppy row for the sake of numbers, thats fine. tighten up the form and how much strength is actually there? lets see, no starting strength, not much in the way of max contraction (retraction), so we are left with some midrange and possibly decelerating it at the bottom of the movement. a whole lot of isometric contraction in the erectors, and some leg drive.

sounds good to me.

so now the question still remains, what is the goal of the movement?
what does the person's intention for the movement?

from a general training standpoint, i wouldnt allow someone to jerk around like that. maybe thats just me......

"Nate is 1 man. 1 man. I am sure you could benefit from the WIDE perspectivers and peofessionals that view this board. I know people personally that view this board and do not post. THEY ARE PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES. It's all for YOUR benefit."

so you are insinuating that i push my point of view, training styles or opinion on nonerz? i brought her here! if i didnt want her to learn, would i? also keep in mind, im paid very well to train people and critique exercise, all day long. i dont just practice on myself, or read about it, i put it into action with people from all walks of life, challenges, goals and physical limitations. im the last person to be looked at as a single opinion. i study this stuff all day between clients, im not some parrot with a flex magazine in my lap sitting at my computer posting here.
 
bignate73 said:
"Nate is 1 man. 1 man. I am sure you could benefit from the WIDE perspectivers and peofessionals that view this board. I know people personally that view this board and do not post. THEY ARE PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES. It's all for YOUR benefit."

so you are insinuating that i push my point of view, training styles or opinion on nonerz? i brought her here! if i didnt want her to learn, would i? also keep in mind, im paid very well to train people and critique exercise, all day long. i dont just practice on myself, or read about it, i put it into action with people from all walks of life, challenges, goals and physical limitations. im the last person to be looked at as a single opinion. i study this stuff all day between clients, im not some parrot with a flex magazine in my lap sitting at my computer posting here.

Nate. There are few people in life that speak without intentions I am one. Do not look into what I say bc there is nothing behind it. ok?

1 mans view is one mans view regardless of what you have studied and practiced. I understand you to be a leader and one that teaches a love and passion with a tremendous amount of real life experience behind it. Other views are necessary frm time to time to differentiate. That's all.

What you have wrote leads me to believe that you are either insecure about what you are teaching or you are looking to find extended meaning into the dry statement I had made.
 
actually i saw it as an attack on my integrity and intentions. one that i dont appreciate since i devote so much of my life to others and this sport.

as for what was discussed above, the point is: you can find a positive aspect to any type of variation of exercise, if you have a relevant goal behind it. but as t3c said, why do it? if there is not a valid carryover for it, then is it ego? moving the weight from point a to point b for the sake of calling it a row? there has to be a justification.
 
bignate73 said:
actually i saw it as an attack on my integrity and intentions. one that i dont appreciate since i devote so much of my life to others and this sport.

This is insecurity Nate.

I would never challenge your integrity Nate. 1 mans opinion is 1 mans opinion. I have worked with professional strength caoches and they all had something to offer. No 1 was better than the other and if I only used 1 coach I would have never made the progress I had made.
 
Top Bottom