being GAY.

[Warik]

Observation:

I've responded to almost everyone who has made a comment involving me.

Note: almost everyone.

-Warik

 

[HumorMe]

*munching popcorn* And to think I almost watched Will and Grace tonight.

Gymtime

I'm out of popcorn...can you spare some?

 

[smallmovesal]

Observation:

I've responded to almost everyone who has made a comment involving me.

Note: almost everyone.

-Warik

"wah"

you just don't have the skills to defeat me in an intellectual challenge since i've already smoked you once... heh heh

 

[wyst]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: being GAY.

My skin is quite thick. Your prior, and current, insult had no effect on me. I'm simply stating fact that is relevant to this argument, and you are cleverly formulating subtle insults based on what I said. If you had not noticed, that accomplishes nothing.

They say I have no empathy. Sorry if I think with my brain and not my feelings.

What exactly are you trying to prove by arguing against my points?

I implied that gays were at high risk for AIDS infection. Do you believe that is incorrect?

I said that suicide was optional. Do you believe that is incorrect?

I said that there is no such thing as a valid reason for suicide. Do you believe that is incorrect?

How is it possible that someone has the right to dress a certain way, but I do not have the right to passively dislike it? I don't have the right to passively dislike someone's attire, yet you have the right to actively dislike my arguments? There's more hypocrisy here than on Capitol Hill. YIKES

Do you realize that even people who agree with you will take sides against you because you are so utterly repellent? I doubt that you care enough about the people around you to understand what I'm saying to you, but I will point out that making arguements that alienate your entire audience is fruitless regardless of the merits of your positions. You lack tact, grace, empathy, wit, personality, or any of the other qualities that make for an effect speaker/writer. I suspect that you have some dim inkling of this and that this is the reason you come on to these boards and provoke people, because at least this way you can get a little human contact or attention, because normally your rel world flat-affect/sociopath detachedly amused demeanor probably creeps people out to the point where they won't give you the time of day.

It's not too late! You can get help. I'd start looking for good shrink soon, though. You'll know it's too late when you start cutting up cats and frogs, or maybe lighting fires and then going home and wetting the bed you sleep in in your parent's house.

Wyst

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

Warik,

I caught that. I wonder if your implicit target did.

Interestingly, at medical conferences and discussions on AIDS, gays are often the MOST informed, most knowledgeable, most up to date.

If new infections indicate risk of AIDS, gays' risk is decreasing. Straight black males are highest-risk group now.

 

[gymtime]

Gymtime

I'm out of popcorn...can you spare some?

Soytainly.

 

[flexed1]

Ryan when folks find out I am gay its after the fact and they know me as a person. you see I don't like what is portrayed in the media as it does not represent me. my ex ( the one on survivor) has taken on this entire femine gay thing and it sickens me as podunk towns think this is what every gay guy is like. when they do find out its never been a problem and I can't recall ever being shunned on. my personal life is just that and all know my current boyfriend who like me is not what is perceived as gay. actually he had a college scholarship to be a point guard at university of Akron Ohio.

and as for gays being the leaders in having aids the community as a hole has improved so much on this and gay aids cases have fallen as aids straight cases have risen. aids is not only a gay disease it unlike some here has no bias.

many third world countries lead the world in aids cases and its not because there gay. some of us need to pull our heads out of our asses and realize we are bigots.

 

[wyst]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: being GAY.

How is it possible that someone has the right to dress a certain way, but I do not have the right to passively dislike it? I don't have the right to passively dislike someone's attire, yet you have the right to actively dislike my arguments? There's more hypocrisy here than on Capitol Hill. YIKES

You're not passively disliking it. I'm objecting to the way you purposely post your sophomoric opinions in such insulting and insensitive ways.

 

[wyst]

"wah"

you just don't have the skills to defeat me in an intellectual challenge since i've already smoked you once... heh heh

Heh. He's a coward. We had a really funny debate the other night, where the only way he could back up or even explain his opinion was to say, in effect:

why is what I think right? For the same reason 2+2=4. It just is.

He just kept pulling his mr spock this-does-not-compute thing with his debate club wannabe tactics and never could actually put together a single reasonable explanation for his position. I'm not saying he didn't convince me, I'm saying that when it came down to having some substance behind his lame attitude...well, let's just say he couldn't get it up.

As you say, he has very little life experience to back up these opinions that he must have picked up on talk radio somewhere.

Wyst

 

[smallmovesal]

well it sucks to be intellectually "bitch slapped" by a hot smart chick, doesn't it?