Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

aromasin

No. Well, some maybe. You dont say how often you are going to take that. If ED, then fine. You can experiment and see what works for you, most people take double that, but on an EOD dosing schedule.
 
for me half an ml a day was too powerful while running 500mg's test. Start at a certain doseage and just adjust from there. If you want to be on the safe side start higher then 12.5, but I doubt you'll need 25 unless you're running a gram.
 
Aromasin supposedly does not affect IGF-1 levels. Really, the only way to influence IGF-1 levels is to add HGH into your cycle or use Long R3. I think that aromasin, femara, and arimidex have very slight side effects. I have changed my opinion. I would go with what's available and affordable, for I have used all three and I have confidence in them.
 
DrJMW said:
Aromasin supposedly does not affect IGF-1 levels. Really, the only way to influence IGF-1 levels is to add HGH into your cycle or use Long R3. I think that aromasin, femara, and arimidex have very slight side effects. I have changed my opinion. I would go with what's available and affordable, for I have used all three and I have confidence in them.

Doc, please clarify what you mean by you have changed your opinion. Meaning you no longer think they have major side effects? Do you still like Aromasin best of them due to lower negative effect on lipid profile?
 
If availability, money and time weren't an object, then Aromasin would be my first choice. Otherwise, going with Femara or Arimidex really doesn't make much difference. With proper diet and AAS cycling, I have seen that Femara and Arimidex are just as effective at countering estrogenic sides as aromasin. Bottom line: Everyone, except those with superior generics, should be using some type of aromatase inhibitor (either aromasin, femara, or arimidex) DURING an aromatizing (Testosterone-based) cycle. I have seen those with superior genetics and low BF% get away with using Nolvadex as their antiestrogen during a cycle. Everybody ahs to listen to their bodies and make the adjustments.
 
DrJMW said:
If availability, money and time weren't an object, then Aromasin would be my first choice. Otherwise, going with Femara or Arimidex really doesn't make much difference. With proper diet and AAS cycling, I have seen that Femara and Arimidex are just as effective at countering estrogenic sides as aromasin. Bottom line: Everyone, except those with superior generics, should be using some type of aromatase inhibitor (either aromasin, femara, or arimidex) DURING an aromatizing (Testosterone-based) cycle. I have seen those with superior genetics and low BF% get away with using Nolvadex as their antiestrogen during a cycle. Everybody ahs to listen to their bodies and make the adjustments.

Thanks.
 
IMO, considering the LDL/HDL levels and the hindrance other Anti-E can have on your gains, AROMASIN is hands down the best.

Now if chloeserol concerns are not an issue with you, maybe other things will do fine. Aromasin costs more and IMO it is worth it.
 
Top Bottom