ccorah said:
I am no expert on these matters, however, I am fairly certain that it is not possible to suspend 775mg of stuff in only 1 cc using currently practiced methods. The only way I can think this is possible is using the new solvents discussed in another new thread I just read. Even so, 775 mg/ml sounds very fishy to me. Are you sure you really know whats in your gear?
From the lab:
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HIGHER DOSAGE GEAR
Contrary to the popular belief and the majority opinion surrounding the idea that only a certain mg dosage of gear can be dissolved within a specific ml of carrier oil is, in fact, a fallacy. A fallacy due to the absence of products and support from our major steroid manufacturers which then in turn laid the path for foundationless opinions and theories stemming from this lack of presence. The reason for this absence can certainly be accredited to the typical stationary position of most corporations to stay within the norm of their specific business community. In this case the steroid community, the veterinary community, and the chemical community are the entities that put forth the opinions and products from which they derive their guidelines from. Realistically, how many veterinarian's do you think would request Nandrolone Decanoate at 400mg/ml? Not too many, I hope. Maybe if you wanted a 300lb Rottweiller. Hmmm. I think not.
Adding to this idea, where does it say how much gear can be placed in carrier oil? Where do these people construe such false ideas from? Just because no one was or is attempting these miraculous feats, does not mean that it cannot be done. Unfortunately, many people like to make up there own idea's as to what can and cannot be done when there is no explanation within the majority opinion. Maybe for their own self-indulgence, maybe to sound like they know what they are talking about, I am unsure. However, I am here to tell you different.
It is very simple really. Placing 400mg of Nandrolone Decanoate into 1ml of carrier oil requires the same work as 200mg/ml. Gear with low melting points have a terrific chance of dissolving and staying dissolved within a specific oil BECAUSE of their melting low_points and the fact that they are oil based and not solely because of their dissolvability. Yes dissolvability has a tiny bit to do with it, but not as much as one might think. The gear we are talking about is OIL based which that means when it melts and is in liquid form, it is considered an oil. So, in most cases, anyway, an oil will dissolve in another oil. Let me ask you this, if you mixed soy bean oil and motor oil together, how much soy bean oil do you think would dissolve in the motor oil? Ha, it is a trick question and the answer is, as much as you want. Both, oil based gear and carrier oil, are both considered to have like similarities as far as their liquid consistency is concerned, which is oily. Just as gear crashes or solidifies out of the carrier oil, either the motor oil or the soy bean oil would crash out if the temperatures were brought low enough. Furthermore, let's say you did get the temperature down low enough to freeze soy bean oil; the result would look very similar to crashed gear.
The problem then, occurs when a materials melting point is high; hence, the solidifying point is high. Or, simply, it will solidify at higher temperatures. Therefore, at your typical room temperature a specific gear with a higher solidifying point will crash easier than a lower solidifying gear. Specifically, the higher the mg dosage per ml of higher solidifying gear the better chance of crashing. Some examples of gear that fit this profile are: Nandrolone Phenylpropionate, Testosterone Phenylpropionate and Testosterone Propionate.
And just the opposite with such materials as nandrolone decanote, testosterone decanoate, testosterone enanthate, whose solidifying point is very low. These materials therefore have a much better chance of staying in liquid form at room temperature.
You may visit: XXXXXXXX for details on certain chemicals, however, the site does not provide info on solidifying points, only melting points. As a general rule of thumb, however, a high melting point, defines a high solidifying point.
So, you see, it is not so much about dissolvability as it is about solidifying points. However, dissolvability does come into play when higher dosages come into play. Again, depending on the material, higher dosage could mean 100mg for Testosterone Propionate, however, may mean 400mg for Nandrolone Decanoate. The higher the dosage or the more active material you use, the less amount of carrier oil you have to use. Therefore, the less amount of material in its solid form will stay dissolved. Yes, the material may be oil-based; however, with no oil to insulate it from the cooling temperatures, it will crash at VERY high dosages.
Example: Using Nandrolone Decanoate and placing four grams of this material per 10ml vial approximately 4ml of that vial is carrier oil. The rest is the active material in its liquid/oil form, in this case Nandrolone Decanoate. However, if we go further, and use 6 grams of active per 10ml vial, we would probably use no more than 1ml of carrier oil, and this is where the dissolvability issue comes into play. Where there is not enough carrier oil to support the solidifying active material, hence, you get the 'crashing' effect.
This explanation wasn't even needed. I would simply like to say, and it is as easy as this: making high dosages is SIMPLY a matter of doing it, nothing more. The job consists of easily placing the active material into a carrier oil, heating gently until all the material melts, and then to wait and see if it crashes.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
