Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below One thing that I can understand is the comments the gays use when I ask them don't they find Shania Twain, Ulma Thruman or Catherine Zeta Jones hot? They say they look at them like us dudes would look at other actor dudes which chicks would find that were hot. Which makes some sense. But what about bis? Obiously, they are turned on by women too so aren't they the sickest ones by going after dudes? I mean what is their excuse? See what I am saying?
Are BiSexual People the Most Demented?
- Thread starter curling
- Start date
coverguy
New member
Too each their own, whether you personally like it or not.
Question: Do you like watching two women go at it? How about if they stopped 2/3 of the way through and pulled you into the mix? Are they (bi, by definition) now the "sickest ones?"
Everyone has their own personal sexual preferences and attractions; and it's right to them, not sick at all. Personally i'm all about the ladies, but that's just me.
Question: Do you like watching two women go at it? How about if they stopped 2/3 of the way through and pulled you into the mix? Are they (bi, by definition) now the "sickest ones?"
Everyone has their own personal sexual preferences and attractions; and it's right to them, not sick at all. Personally i'm all about the ladies, but that's just me.
Coverguy said:
This is going to sound weird but I thought somebody might bring up the chick thing. Chicks are better looking than men(I know I am cutting down my own gender) They are softer, prettier and curvier(is that a word) and they have that emotional attachment that guys just don't do. You don't see two straight guys holding hands do ya? Or trying on clothes together do ya'll So it is at least more understand how a chick could find another chick attractive. For a guy to find another guy sexually attractive he would have to be gay inotherwords not find chicks sexually appealling at all otherwise they would know that being with a chick is better than being with a dude.
Robert Jan
New member
curling said:
no i dont see what you're saying. If I was attracted to both id be going after both.
coverguy
New member
curling said:
That's a common arguement, and i'm naturally inclined to agree. However, attraction doesn't always work like that. If that were the case all women would like women or they'd be weird, too. Some (both men and women) are attracted to the rugged, masculine form of the man, and prefer it over the soft, supple form of the women. As different as this seems to you and I, for them it is just their natural proclivity in terms of sexuality.
Y_lifter
New member
For a guy to find another guy sexually attractive he would have to be gay inotherwords not find chicks sexually appealling at all otherwise they would know that being with a chick is better than being with a dude.
I swear.. I read this over and over, like 5 times real slow
And I still don't get it..
It's called a Double Standard Curl..
The fact that 2 guys is icky to guys and 2 girls is OK...
I feel the same way, but what am I to do about it ?
I swear.. I read this over and over, like 5 times real slow
And I still don't get it..
It's called a Double Standard Curl..
The fact that 2 guys is icky to guys and 2 girls is OK...
I feel the same way, but what am I to do about it ?
sh4dowf4lcon
New member
in a word? no.
john937 said:
No, its not I was using duragative statements on a nation of origin. I am not using duragative racist terms here. And being bisexual has got to be a choice. Because if they find both sexes attractive they could go straight. Where a gay guy not finding girls attractive options are harder.
Y_Lifter said:
No I was making a point about all sexuality. I mean I guess gay people think we are a little strange since we are not like them. I was saying bisexual are not either one of us. I guess what I was trying to say was that homosexuals say they can't help being attractive to men just like we can't help being attracted to women. But the bisexual has a real choice do they not? If it came wrong, I apologize but I still think it is an interesting topic. If the mods don't agree, I will gladly close it.
FreeballinDC
Dumper Humper
curling said:
Now I get it.
I personally don't think straight people are strange for wanting to have sex with the opposite sex. Nor do I think it's strange for homo's to have sex with people of the same sex. Bi sexuals, in my opinion, have the best of both worlds. They can have sex with whoever they want.
I am seeing a guy who researching the phenomenon known as the Down Low.
These are guys who are so closeted and afraid of being labeled as gay, that they'll marry a woman, but still have sex with men on the side. He left me a book to read on the subject. Very interesting personal insights from the author on what it's like to want a woman and want a man at the same time.
john937
New member
Damn, I promised myself I wasn't going to get into it, but...
The way my boyfriend explains it:
"You can choose to eat only salty food.
You can choose to eat only sweet food.
But you don't. You eat a balance of BOTH sweet and salty.
If you eat too much of one it makes you crave the other even more."
He is perfectly happy with his woman, but it makes him want to even
things out with a guy.
It's about balance.
The way my boyfriend explains it:
"You can choose to eat only salty food.
You can choose to eat only sweet food.
But you don't. You eat a balance of BOTH sweet and salty.
If you eat too much of one it makes you crave the other even more."
He is perfectly happy with his woman, but it makes him want to even
things out with a guy.
It's about balance.
john937 said:
Ok how is that going to work for you? I mean are you going to let him go out with other chicks? Do they not count as cheating? Becuase this is a weird hetro thing here. I don't think i would be as mad at my wife if I caught her with a chick is I would a dude? Do you feel the same way?
john937
New member
Monogomy is highly overrated.
I really don't get the "cheating" thing.
Agonizing over who's been "cheated on" strikes me as a very insecure point of view.
I reaks of "I'm so inferior, if I loose this lover, I'll never get another!" yech!
If he wants to be with me and I want to be with him,
what difference does it make who else he wants to see tomorrow?
(assuming disease protection all around).
Plus if he has the freedom to "cheat" on me,
then I have the freedom to "cheat" on him.
Generally, I've found in relationships with men,
the more freedom I give them,
the more the enjoy being with me.
I really don't get the "cheating" thing.
Agonizing over who's been "cheated on" strikes me as a very insecure point of view.
I reaks of "I'm so inferior, if I loose this lover, I'll never get another!" yech!
If he wants to be with me and I want to be with him,
what difference does it make who else he wants to see tomorrow?
(assuming disease protection all around).
Plus if he has the freedom to "cheat" on me,
then I have the freedom to "cheat" on him.
Generally, I've found in relationships with men,
the more freedom I give them,
the more the enjoy being with me.
Last edited:
Similar threads
