Its a travesty to bail out AIG to the tune of 85 billion. The shareholders have seen the profits of good times in the past and reaped profits. Why should the american public be responible for bailing out the the bad decisions of there executives.
What do you mean>> I gues Bushs friend owned alot of shares of it. I wish the governmnent would bail me out of all of my stocks that I have bought over the years that have tanked. I could retire..
Its a travesty to bail out AIG to the tune of 85 billion. The shareholders have seen the profits of good times in the past and reaped profits. Why should the american public be responible for bailing out the the bad decisions of there executives.
What do you mean>> I gues Bushs friend owned alot of shares of it. I wish the governmnent would bail me out of all of my stocks that I have bought over the years that have tanked. I could retire..
AIG going under would not have done anything more than our government overspending the 08 budget by 387 billion dollars? So NO AIG would not have affected anything real world,,
I still think we should have a hands off attitude, but with responsibility amongst white collar employees. If there is fraudulent accounting going on, these CEO's and CFO's need to be punished
AIG going under would not have done anything more than our government overspending the 08 budget by 387 billion dollars? So NO AIG would not have affected anything real world,,